To admit, as long as the political situation does not change, I hope Germany will block any sale of the EJ-200.
I also wish soTo admit, as long as the political situation does not change, I hope Germany will block any sale of the EJ-200.
40 new and 79 modded F-16V (along with 150 F-16 Özgür) would fill the interim/stopgap modernization need of the AF well enough especially when supplemented with some LO drones (Kizilelma + Anka 3) until Kaan gets inducted into service (whenever that may be).100¹⁰⁰ times agree.I also wish so
You simply don't need to procure new F-15EXs or Eurofighters and wait 4-5 years for delivery on top of that. It's because the Air Force is simply too late to place an order for foreign (stopgap) fighters when indigenous solutions for their problem will become available in that same timeframe.
).
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ibrahim-sünnetci-b2951544_tübi̇tak-sage-ana-yükleniciliğinde-geliştirme-activity-7252627678246174720-Pvcl?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios
Like, it's outright unachievable unless we'll see a dozen aircraft flying early next year, and exactly nothing will go wrong on Turkiye's first fighter aircraft ever. People who declare this delivery target are not faithful to the customer.
That was a typo, 28 - 25 = 3
But yes it's a bit tight.
Why are you reviving this topic even though we've reached the consensus that the current (P0) prototype has no weapon bays as it is only a ground-test article made airworthy (essentially a technology demonstrator).
View: https://x.com/ssysfakb/status/1860007055228305700?t=2EWyfmCFzxqcTj7BytitSA&s=19
For some reason they decided to repeat this.
P0 has empty space that could be suitable to be a weapons bay, however this doesn't mean that it has one. I have seen them, they are just shut with panels.Why are you reviving this topic even though we've reached the consensus that the current (P0) prototype has no weapon bays as it is only a ground-test article made airworthy (essentially a technology demonstrator).
I couldn't find the exact picture that shows how deep the underbody bay is but even from the angle of the second pic that you've attached, it is visibly not that deep as there's a support structure occupying the majority of the space inside.
View attachment 751132View attachment 751133
View attachment 751138
(I'm currently on the road so considering the circumstances this is the best I could draw on my laptop)
View attachment 751137
Moreover, you can see from the pics above that there are clearly no weapon bay doors, those are just regular maintenance panels on the first prototype.
View: https://x.com/SavunmaTR/status/1653812863641825303
I think @Radonislav had shared that in here before it got deleted.
------
Recently, we've also heard that the second prototype (P1) looks almost nothing like the first (P0, demo) prototype.
View: https://x.com/ssysfakb/status/1860007055228305700?t=2EWyfmCFzxqcTj7BytitSA&s=19
We even have confirmation from multiple officials that the weapon integration and testing activities are only going to begin in 2025 with the roll out of P1.
Well, that was the original plan, so they are sticking to their original plan more than anything.
That was not the original plan
Sorry, but it is, from 2018.
www.veryansintv.com
Please refrain yourself from sharing baseless speculation so that we can keep up the quality of this thread. Moreover, the background of the author doesn't give any credibility to his speculation whatsoever.the article is in turkish but its worth taking a look
written by retired airforce commander
View attachment 751457View attachment 751455Beyazıt Karataş yazdı: Türk kartalı Milli Muharip Uçak-2
Emekli Hava Pilot Tümgeneral Beyazıt Karataş ve makine mühendisi Fazıl Altay yazdı…
There's a difference between prototypes and production tooling when it comes to assembly time. Prototypes are often hand-assembled with minimal major tooling to keep everything flying. This means that building one is a lot more time-consuming than telling a running assembly line "print me one more".
