Shhhhh secret featureSome fan photoshops. Gotta admit, it looks much better with a paint job.
View attachment 690810View attachment 690811View attachment 690812
Wait I just realized something, why does it look on the 3rd pic like as if it is flying in the Exosphere?
CEO Temel Kotil
"The National Combat Aircraft will fly in 2023. We planned the flight for 2025, but we revised the date."
"National Combat Aircraft has 2 F-16 engines."
"The National Combat Aircraft will be a documentary. The videos are being shot, you will cry if you see it."
"We're checking the fuel tanks and the hydraulics. We'll fuel up in the next days and then start the engines."
"5th generation planes can destroy air and ground targets from hundreds of kilometers away. So there is no need to go near the target."
"A miniaturized model of ANKA-3 unmanned warplane developed by TAI was flown, and the larger model will be revealed in the coming months."
"The flight will take place in March or April."
"It will be able to accompany TF-X, HÜRJET and other air platforms."
Some of the above are Canardzz's comments though.UPDATE
-TAI team has started the engines of the MMU/TF-X. The ceremony date is to be decided by the presidency.
-A lighter, more agile Hürkuş, the so called Hürkuş-II, is on its way.
-The static Hürjet is currently undergoing tests, whereas the flying prototype is currently on her landing gears.
-ATAK-2 attack heli will be on her landing gears very soon.
-ANKA-3 will be massive, albeit being a little smaller than Aksungur. She will appear in the coming months.
View: https://twitter.com/M5Dergi/status/1612729603591659521?s=20&t=eYm4nKFgee28XPu9QqK6mw
The National Combat Aircraft started the engine
New design HÜRKUŞ is coming
T929 ATAK-2's airframe is almost finished
HÜRJET is on its landing gears, preparing for flight
ANKA-3 will appear very soon
@TUSAS_TR
@Temel_Kotil
I paraphrased the stuff that was on the article. So yeah it isn't a direct translation of the tweet.Some of the above are Canardzz's comments though.UPDATE
-TAI team has started the engines of the MMU/TF-X. The ceremony date is to be decided by the presidency.
-A lighter, more agile Hürkuş, the so called Hürkuş-II, is on its way.
-The static Hürjet is currently undergoing tests, whereas the flying prototype is currently on her landing gears.
-ATAK-2 attack heli will be on her landing gears very soon.
-ANKA-3 will be massive, albeit being a little smaller than Aksungur. She will appear in the coming months.
View: https://twitter.com/M5Dergi/status/1612729603591659521?s=20&t=eYm4nKFgee28XPu9QqK6mw
Here's a direct translation of the tweet
The National Combat Aircraft started the engine
New design HÜRKUŞ is coming
T929 ATAK-2's airframe is almost finished
HÜRJET is on its landing gears, preparing for flight
ANKA-3 will appear very soon
@TUSAS_TR
@Temel_Kotil
Was gonna quote myself. But it looks you've done it for me insteadTAI TF-X everybody. Hydraulic tests will commence at 17.00 today. Engine integration was done in 2 hours like aforementioned. Fuel system tests were also successful.View attachment 690882
I get his excitement, but Mr. Kotil really needs to chill down a bit He's talking about Auto GCAS. TAI is, in fact, working on autonomous RTB, but it will probably be implemented in later blocks.BREAKING
TF-X will be able to autonomously return to base in case the pilot faints.
Seems to be the case. The rollout date was postponed slightly.I get his excitement, but Mr. Kotil really needs to chill down a bit He's talking about Auto GCAS. TAI is, in fact, working on autonomous RTB, but it will probably be implemented in later blocks.BREAKING
TF-X will be able to autonomously return to base in case the pilot faints.
BTW, I heard they postponed the roll-out to April to focus on the maiden flight. Is it true?
Hopefully not a small country. We need our own Indonesia in the programme.A foreign country has requested to join the TF-X program!
Agreements will be signed if all goes well.
We will seeHopefully not a small country. We need our own Indonesia in the programme.A foreign country has requested to join the TF-X program!
Agreements will be signed if all goes well.
I think it might be the KSA. A while ago there were rumors that a delegation visited the prototype assembly building. It was the day we got the first leak of the completed prototype.Hopefully not a small country. We need our own Indonesia in the programme.A foreign country has requested to join the TF-X program!
Agreements will be signed if all goes well.
How has CDR not already happened? You need to have the design review before starting to build the partsTF-X's CDR will be completed before the maiden flight.
TAI disagrees with you They do it differently.How has CDR not already happened? You need to have the design review before starting to build the partsTF-X's CDR will be completed before the maiden flight.
Its obviously not a Critical Design Review thenTAI disagrees with you They do it differently.
TAI started producing parts for the TF-X when major design activities were still ongoingIts obviously not a Critical Design Review thenTAI disagrees with you They do it differently.
Design comes before build
That seems like a bad idea to me, and very likely to cost them time and money down the line.TAI started producing parts for the TF-X when major design activities were still ongoingIts obviously not a Critical Design Review thenTAI disagrees with you They do it differently.
Design comes before build
They work in a model which they call as "Cold War development cycle". So from a classical 21st century western aircraft development point of view it may not make sense but since Turkey has put itself in a tight corner, they are trying to accelerate it as much as possible.Its obviously not a Critical Design Review thenTAI disagrees with you They do it differently.
Design comes before build
Program managers over at TAI are pretty confident with what they've come up with. It's worth mentioning that TAI uses Siemens and Dassault softwares at the same time (just to give an example of their unorthodox techniques).That seems like a bad idea to me, and very likely to cost them time and money down the line.TAI started producing parts for the TF-X when major design activities were still ongoingIts obviously not a Critical Design Review thenTAI disagrees with you They do it differently.
Design comes before build
I'm sure they are confident, they wouldn't be doing it otherwise. But that doesn't mean it's the smart thing to do, at least from my point of view. If you don't finish major design before you start making prototypes you risk making the prototypes unrepresentative of the final product. You might still be able to get some valuable data from these prototypes but it also means you'll need to make entirely new prototypes that are representative of the final product and you'll have to redo tests with these new prototypes.Program managers over at TAI are pretty confident with what they've come up with. It's worth mentioning that TAI uses Siemens and Dassault softwares at the same time (just to give an example of their unorthodox techniques).That seems like a bad idea to me, and very likely to cost them time and money down the line.TAI started producing parts for the TF-X when major design activities were still ongoingIts obviously not a Critical Design Review thenTAI disagrees with you They do it differently.
Design comes before build
That is a normal programme. You can further split things up by having graduated PDRs CDRs etc. For more rapid programmes. But it comes with risk of downstream changes having significant cost/time impacts. Aiming for right first time as per B-21 / Hawk is generally a quicker and cheaper way of getting to the final product.TAI started producing parts for the TF-X when major design activities were still ongoing
That's a thing to talk, when we are talking about CDR, are we talking about the screw supplier or who buy the buttons from? Or the airframe design.That is a normal programme. You can further split things up by having graduated PDRs CDRs etc. For more rapid programmes. But it comes with risk of downstream changes having significant cost/time impacts. Aiming for right first time as per B-21 / Hawk is generally a quicker and cheaper way of getting to the final product.TAI started producing parts for the TF-X when major design activities were still ongoing
Is this actually defining CDR as something like 100% parts sign off? And e.g. there's a few cockpit buttons that haven't been done yet...
Using software from multiple providers is also business as usual
When we talk about CDR we obviously are talking about the whole system, ie the aircraft, including the airframe. If the airframe itself is in a frozen state as you're saying then that must be that the critical design is complete, which obviously is not the case here when CDR is not completed yet.That's a thing to talk, when we are talking about CDR, are we talking about the screw supplier or who buy the buttons from? Or the airframe design.
But airframe itself was in a frozen state when it got into production, so different levels of readiness. But we can expect small changes after flight tests