Dilandu
I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
Hm! Never heard about that. Could you please give details?
Imperial and Nationalist China Warship Projects
- Thread starter Tzoli
- Start date
When I seach the keyword “艦”（means warship），There are nearly two thousand query results，Most of them are useless or require Taiwanese ID
Only a few can be browsed，BUT，some are All Chinese documents like this
lucky，I still get someting
Vickers Submarine
German and Italian design small destroyers
Last edited:
I have not seen reliable information in Chinese, but some people say it comes from the Jane’s Fight Ships 1962
don’t know if there’s anything in Russia
I read about it a while back - at some point, Kruschev offered a Pr. 26bis cruiser, and the Chinese were interested in a Sverdlov, but this would have required extremely high prices for the PLAN, from basing rights for the Russians all the way up to direct Soviet control of the navy, so these offers were rejected. Gonna try and find the source again
Looks like the Soviets offered Kaganovich after it was damaged in 1958, but the PLAN wanted a Sverdlov- the USSR offered Ordzhonikidze, but one Sino-Soviet split later, that ship was sold to Indonesia, and became Irian.
here's one source mentioning it:
深度：ä¸å¯æ€è®® ä¸å›½ä¸ºä½•æ‹’ç»äº†è‹è”白é€çš„巡洋舰
深度：ä¸å¯æ€è®® ä¸å›½ä¸ºä½•æ‹’ç»äº†è‹è”白é€çš„巡洋舰
mil.news.sina.com.cn
Last edited:
Dilandu
I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
Thank you! Very interesting data!
Boer van Seven
Soulstar Ship
- Joined
- 19 February 2021
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 11
That is Chang Chun,
one of the 4 destroyers that PLAN bought from USSR. Her original name was Решительный.4 ships are all 07 Type destroyers.(Эскадренные миноносцы проекта 7)
1954-1955,four ships arrived in Qingdao,China.They are An Shan,Fu Shun,Chang Chun and Tai Yuan.
Boer van Seven
Soulstar Ship
- Joined
- 19 February 2021
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 11
Irian is a 68-бис(an improved 68Type)
Boer van Seven
Soulstar Ship
- Joined
- 19 February 2021
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 11
Oh,I've made a mistake.
I mistook CHANG CHUN for another one,a destroyer.
Maybe PLAN wanted to buy a 68-бис at first,but they failed for some reasons,and they had to name a destroyer.
I mistook CHANG CHUN for another one,a destroyer.
Maybe PLAN wanted to buy a 68-бис at first,but they failed for some reasons,and they had to name a destroyer.
Boer van Seven
Soulstar Ship
- Joined
- 19 February 2021
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 11
The source is available to see in a Chinese magazine called Weapon too. (2016.Issue 8 P81-83)I read about it a while back - at some point, Kruschev offered a Pr. 26bis cruiser, and the Chinese were interested in a Sverdlov, but this would have required extremely high prices for the PLAN, from basing rights for the Russians all the way up to direct Soviet control of the navy, so these offers were rejected. Gonna try and find the source again
Looks like the Soviets offered Kaganovich after it was damaged in 1958, but the PLAN wanted a Sverdlov- the USSR offered Ordzhonikidze, but one Sino-Soviet split later, that ship was sold to Indonesia, and became Irian.
here's one source mentioning it:
深度：ä¸å¯æ€è®® ä¸å›½ä¸ºä½•æ‹’ç»äº†è‹è”白é€çš„巡洋舰
深度：ä¸å¯æ€è®® ä¸å›½ä¸ºä½•æ‹’ç»äº†è‹è”白é€çš„巡洋舰mil.news.sina.com.cn
I have read books written by the writer,Sa Su(萨苏).He is a famous writer.
Here are some words translated by machine:
According to Xiao Jinguang's memoirs, there are two 7000 ton light cruisers and four destroyers; The commemorative article of the Sixth Fleet (sixth detachment) said that there were 4 light cruisers and 4 destroyers; In his later years, the person in charge of buying the ship recalled that there were five frigates and several minesweepers. These are the numbers of contracts signed or ready to sign. At that time, the Sixth Fleet prepared the names and establishment of eight ships, four were city names (like frigates) and four were the names of "wind" (minesweepers); The seventh fleet has at least four ships reserved (I don't know whether to include the three ships that arrived later)
Boer van Seven
Soulstar Ship
- Joined
- 19 February 2021
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 11
PLAN didn't get the boat
However, it is said that the main guns originally intended to give to the unfinished sverdlov were given to China as coastal defense artillery.
It is also the most special caliber artillery of China's coastal defense forces.
The names of the so-called four "light cruisers" are Changchun, Anton, Xiangtan and Langzhong. The four "destroyers" have spring, summer, winter and west winds (the reason why there is no autumn wind is that this name has been used to name a minesweeper)
However, it is said that the main guns originally intended to give to the unfinished sverdlov were given to China as coastal defense artillery.
It is also the most special caliber artillery of China's coastal defense forces.
The names of the so-called four "light cruisers" are Changchun, Anton, Xiangtan and Langzhong. The four "destroyers" have spring, summer, winter and west winds (the reason why there is no autumn wind is that this name has been used to name a minesweeper)
Not Anton but Antong（Although the translation into Chinese writing is the same），now the city has a new name Dandong（Translation is similar to French Pre-dreadnought Danton）
About the PLAN cruisers，here is some information
This is the Memoirs of XiaoJingguang（He is first PLAN commander）
On PDF page 123（realbook page 95）
In 1950, PLAN ordered two 7,000-ton light cruisers and five escort destroyers from the United Kingdom through Hong Kong.
But due to the outbreak of the Korean War, the order was cancelled
This is the Memoirs of XiaoJingguang（He is first PLAN commander）
肖劲光回忆录（续集） - 单本综合 - 抗日战争纪念网
扉页 目录 第一章 从陆军到海军 第二章 海军建军会议 第三章 打好三个桩子 第四章 关于武器装备 第五章 巩固中求发展 第六章 海军建设的新篇章 第七章 谋求海军新技术 第八章 检查团到来前
www.krzzjn.com
In 1950, PLAN ordered two 7,000-ton light cruisers and five escort destroyers from the United Kingdom through Hong Kong.
But due to the outbreak of the Korean War, the order was cancelled
- Joined
- 6 September 2006
- Messages
- 4,601
- Reaction score
- 8,563
Really? Never heard of this before. Would like to see a British source for this.
Probably more likely to be ex-RN ships than new construction, the cruisers may have been pre-war Leander-class ships (the only 7,000-ton light cruisers the RN had), although most had already been scrapped by 1950 or the process of scrapping.
- Joined
- 1 February 2011
- Messages
- 2,796
- Reaction score
- 3,150
Well there was the HMS Aurora an Arethusa class light cruiser which became the nationalist Chungkinh in 1948 and then defected to the communist and got like 4 other names....
Tchoungking 1949,
Huang He 1951,
Pei Ching 1951,
Kuang Chou 1958
Looks like the communists were not so united regarding ship names???
Tchoungking 1949,
Huang He 1951,
Pei Ching 1951,
Kuang Chou 1958
Looks like the communists were not so united regarding ship names???
- Joined
- 6 September 2006
- Messages
- 4,601
- Reaction score
- 8,563
True but the Arethusas were 5,300-tons. The Leanders at least would have offered some commonality of armament.
I can't imagine the British Labour government doing a deal with Communist China in this period however.
- Joined
- 1 February 2011
- Messages
- 2,796
- Reaction score
- 3,150
7.000tons was the quote yes but by late WW2 the full displacement of the Arethusas were closing to 7.000tons!
But indeed, I see no other government willing to sell any military hardware to a communist nation of that time except the Soviet Union and maybe some minor nation say South American.
But indeed, I see no other government willing to sell any military hardware to a communist nation of that time except the Soviet Union and maybe some minor nation say South American.
I never heard the fourth name，The first name is the name from the KMT
The third name is to give up repairs, as the name of the dormitory ship at 1964
The Chinese who paints pictures is just a hobbyist, a person who draws pictures casually based on his imagination. This person drew a lot of pictures, including ships and airplanes. But the quality is not high.drawing of a Chinese，The layout of the 1,800-ton cruiser is different今日头条
www.toutiao.com
View attachment 663696
View attachment 663697
View attachment 663695
View attachment 663698
- Joined
- 1 February 2011
- Messages
- 2,796
- Reaction score
- 3,150
Not much difference only the funnels and light gun armament placement, but you can expect that sort of difference without official drawings or sketches as different artist might interpret the data differently about these small cruisers.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 October 2009
- Messages
- 21,144
- Reaction score
- 12,239
Dilandu
I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
As ironclad gunboat she wasn't too bad.
Bought this magazine
some of the mine torpedo school's pre-war ship plans, mostly torpedo boats like CMB and MAS, only a few larger support ships and China never got them
A German-built support ship was taken over by the German Navy and taken over by Denmark after World War II
Named Qi Jiguang（an ancient general famous for defeating Japanese pirates）
length 96.2 meters，full load displacement 2620 tons
Two 88mm main guns，Two twin 37mm guns and Four 20mm guns
Another one, built in Hong Kong, was captured by the Japanese and taken by the Dutch after the war
Named Tan Lun（also an ancient general）
length 223 feet Displacement 750 tons
Three 3-inch main guns
some of the mine torpedo school's pre-war ship plans, mostly torpedo boats like CMB and MAS, only a few larger support ships and China never got them
A German-built support ship was taken over by the German Navy and taken over by Denmark after World War II
Named Qi Jiguang（an ancient general famous for defeating Japanese pirates）
length 96.2 meters，full load displacement 2620 tons
Two 88mm main guns，Two twin 37mm guns and Four 20mm guns
Another one, built in Hong Kong, was captured by the Japanese and taken by the Dutch after the war
Named Tan Lun（also an ancient general）
length 223 feet Displacement 750 tons
Three 3-inch main guns
Last edited:
- Joined
- 1 February 2011
- Messages
- 2,796
- Reaction score
- 3,150
The Uraga Dock Company's proposal for a Heavy Cruiser for China:
www.deviantart.com
The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 162,5 (pp) x 15,25 x 4,87 meters
Displacement: 6.000tons (standard)
Engines: Unknown around 35-40.000shp Kampon Steam Turbines, 2 shafts
Range: Unknown likely around 13.000km at 22km/h (7.000nm at 12knots)
Speed: 52km/h (28knots)
Armour: Unknown, likely 25mm Deck, 51mm (25+25mm) over Machinery, 19mm over Magazines Belt
Armaments:
3x2 20cm/50 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns
4x1 12cm/45 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns,
4x1 76mm/40 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type DP-AA Guns,
4x1 12,7mm or 13,2mm AA Guns
2x3 533mm Torpedo Tubes
30x Depth Charges
2x Seaplanes, Aichi AB-3
Uraga Shipyard Heavy Cruiser Design for China by Tzoli on DeviantArt
www.deviantart.com
The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 162,5 (pp) x 15,25 x 4,87 meters
Displacement: 6.000tons (standard)
Engines: Unknown around 35-40.000shp Kampon Steam Turbines, 2 shafts
Range: Unknown likely around 13.000km at 22km/h (7.000nm at 12knots)
Speed: 52km/h (28knots)
Armour: Unknown, likely 25mm Deck, 51mm (25+25mm) over Machinery, 19mm over Magazines Belt
Armaments:
3x2 20cm/50 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns
4x1 12cm/45 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns,
4x1 76mm/40 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type DP-AA Guns,
4x1 12,7mm or 13,2mm AA Guns
2x3 533mm Torpedo Tubes
30x Depth Charges
2x Seaplanes, Aichi AB-3
TZoli starting on the chinese cruiser offers, what a lovely dayThe Uraga Dock Company's proposal for a Heavy Cruiser for China:
Uraga Shipyard Heavy Cruiser Design for China by Tzoli on DeviantArt
The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 162,5 (pp) x 15,25 x 4,87 meters
Displacement: 6.000tons (standard)
Engines: Unknown around 35-40.000shp Kampon Steam Turbines, 2 shafts
Range: Unknown likely around 13.000km at 22km/h (7.000nm at 12knots)
Speed: 52km/h (28knots)
Armour: Unknown, likely 25mm Deck, 51mm (25+25mm) over Machinery, 19mm over Magazines Belt
Armaments:
3x2 20cm/50 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns
4x1 12cm/45 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns,
4x1 76mm/40 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type DP-AA Guns,
4x1 12,7mm or 13,2mm AA Guns
2x3 533mm Torpedo Tubes
30x Depth Charges
2x Seaplanes, Aichi AB-
- Joined
- 1 February 2011
- Messages
- 2,796
- Reaction score
- 3,150
These are Japanese offers and I've started yesteryearTZoli starting on the chinese cruiser offers, what a lovely dayThe Uraga Dock Company's proposal for a Heavy Cruiser for China:
Uraga Shipyard Heavy Cruiser Design for China by Tzoli on DeviantArt
The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 162,5 (pp) x 15,25 x 4,87 meters
Displacement: 6.000tons (standard)
Engines: Unknown around 35-40.000shp Kampon Steam Turbines, 2 shafts
Range: Unknown likely around 13.000km at 22km/h (7.000nm at 12knots)
Speed: 52km/h (28knots)
Armour: Unknown, likely 25mm Deck, 51mm (25+25mm) over Machinery, 19mm over Magazines Belt
Armaments:
3x2 20cm/50 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns
4x1 12cm/45 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type Guns,
4x1 76mm/40 Type 3 / 3rd Year Type DP-AA Guns,
4x1 12,7mm or 13,2mm AA Guns
2x3 533mm Torpedo Tubes
30x Depth Charges
2x Seaplanes, Aichi AB-
Dilandu
I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
I wonder, why all Japanese export cruisers for China have such mediocre speed? No more than 28 knots at best, 25 knot soften. 3-5 knots less than international average.
Was that the reluctance to risk higher speed on quife small units? Or secret Japanese navy demand, that export projects should not be able to outrun IJN own cruisers?
Was that the reluctance to risk higher speed on quife small units? Or secret Japanese navy demand, that export projects should not be able to outrun IJN own cruisers?
- Joined
- 1 February 2011
- Messages
- 2,796
- Reaction score
- 3,150
Usually if a set of designs had one or more characteristics are the same that means the navy ordered them had those specifics explicitly stated. For example all cruisers are maximum 6.000tons in displacement and maximum 6x 20cm armament. As for speed they might had to work with the old mixed cruisers the ROCN aquired before WW1
Dilandu
I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
Hm, so it may actually be Chinese demands? I was under impression, that those designs were mostly the Japanese own initiative, based on what they assumed China may need/afford.
Price is a big factor, too.
6000 ton displacement and 8 inch main gun is at the request of China
and the British Design 970 also has 6000 tons displacement but faster
Dilandu
I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
Thank you for information!
Similar threads
-
-
-
Argentinian Never-Were Warship Designs and Proposals
- Started by Tzoli
- Replies: 401
-
-