- Joined
- 29 September 2006
- Messages
- 1,692
- Reaction score
- 1,172
Looks like the s**t is about to hit the fan!
You've got a real talent for understatement. Lol. But yes, things are not looking good.Looks like the s**t is about to hit the fan!
I was just thinking about bumping this to harass you on Sunday! Glad you're back putting pen to paper (so to speak)!February 15, 1959
Subic Bay, Zambales, Philippines
Yeah, it's just finding time to write to write this along with a couple fanfics I'm writing, plus work, plus the holidays.I was just thinking about bumping this to harass you on Sunday! Glad you're back putting pen to paper (so to speak)!February 15, 1959
Subic Bay, Zambales, Philippines
Surely you can't be serious !Looks like the s**t is about to hit the fan!
I am serious, and don’t call me Shirley!Surely you can't be serious !Looks like the s**t is about to hit the fan!
Well as long as it does not escalate in nukes flying, would like to see more of the TL in the future, a Nuclear War tends to end things with a bang.You've got a real talent for understatement. Lol. But yes, things are not looking good.Looks like the s**t is about to hit the fan!
They do. But with hydraulic catapults, they're limited in what type of aircraft they can fly.It was a close call and indeed old Essex need better defenses...
The USN is about to run into the same problem with the problem with the "41 for Freedom" and Polaris. The boomers are going to wreck the Navy's shipbuilding budget for years.I wonder if fecal matter hitting the fan in Indonesia could led to a rescue of PA58 / 59 Verdun. By 1958 that third new French carrier looked like a 45000 tons non-nuclear proto-CdG; by 1959 it had become a clone of 33000 tons PA55 Foch - to cut its costs and get it funded. It died only in 1961, a colateral victim of the Force de Frappe enormous expense.
Note that the French Navy before the boomers (Redoutable, 1971) carved itself a niche in the FFP by putting AN-52 tactical nukes on its Etendard IVM. Now that was a smart idea. If they had had that idea earlier, maybe they could have argued about a third carrier... instead they wasted their time trying to navalize early Mirage IV concepts, A-5 Vigilante-style. PA58 was 45 000 tons because of that, and since the Vigilante was screwed by the "41 for freedom" and their Polaris... not a good idea.
I wonder if an Etendard IVM could drag a 1400 kg AN-11. EDIT: AN-22 was "only" 700 kg and not much heavier than an AS-30 so maybe they could have done it.
Back to the thread...
I wonder if the USN will attempt, IIRC, the RN move to have the strategic deterrent being funded separately to their service budget.The USN is about to run into the same problem with the problem with the "41 for Freedom" and Polaris. The boomers are going to wreck the Navy's shipbuilding budget for years.I wonder if fecal matter hitting the fan in Indonesia could led to a rescue of PA58 / 59 Verdun. By 1958 that third new French carrier looked like a 45000 tons non-nuclear proto-CdG; by 1959 it had become a clone of 33000 tons PA55 Foch - to cut its costs and get it funded. It died only in 1961, a colateral victim of the Force de Frappe enormous expense.
Note that the French Navy before the boomers (Redoutable, 1971) carved itself a niche in the FFP by putting AN-52 tactical nukes on its Etendard IVM. Now that was a smart idea. If they had had that idea earlier, maybe they could have argued about a third carrier... instead they wasted their time trying to navalize early Mirage IV concepts, A-5 Vigilante-style. PA58 was 45 000 tons because of that, and since the Vigilante was screwed by the "41 for freedom" and their Polaris... not a good idea.
I wonder if an Etendard IVM could drag a 1400 kg AN-11. EDIT: AN-22 was "only" 700 kg and not much heavier than an AS-30 so maybe they could have done it.
Back to the thread...
This was not too long after the USAF tried to get Congress and the DoD to kill ALL of Naval Aviation, so I doubt it. The Navy came damn close to losing all of their carriers and only Korea saved them. They won't want to try and tricks like that so as to avoid giving the Air Force any more ammunition.I wonder if the USN will attempt, IIRC, the RN move to have the strategic deterrent being funded separately to their service budget.The USN is about to run into the same problem with the problem with the "41 for Freedom" and Polaris. The boomers are going to wreck the Navy's shipbuilding budget for years.I wonder if fecal matter hitting the fan in Indonesia could led to a rescue of PA58 / 59 Verdun. By 1958 that third new French carrier looked like a 45000 tons non-nuclear proto-CdG; by 1959 it had become a clone of 33000 tons PA55 Foch - to cut its costs and get it funded. It died only in 1961, a colateral victim of the Force de Frappe enormous expense.
Note that the French Navy before the boomers (Redoutable, 1971) carved itself a niche in the FFP by putting AN-52 tactical nukes on its Etendard IVM. Now that was a smart idea. If they had had that idea earlier, maybe they could have argued about a third carrier... instead they wasted their time trying to navalize early Mirage IV concepts, A-5 Vigilante-style. PA58 was 45 000 tons because of that, and since the Vigilante was screwed by the "41 for freedom" and their Polaris... not a good idea.
I wonder if an Etendard IVM could drag a 1400 kg AN-11. EDIT: AN-22 was "only" 700 kg and not much heavier than an AS-30 so maybe they could have done it.
Back to the thread...
I'm not against that. Just PM me when you're ready to write something with a brief outline so I can make sure it'll sync up with the rest of the story.Would you allow me to write a brief spinoff (depends wether French carriers are already part of your story or not) ?
February 16, 1959
Over the Banda Sea
For this mission, the planes in the formation were being flown unarmed. They wanted to send a message, not start a war.
It means they weren't bombed up with KS-1 missiles hanging from the wings. The Tu-16 has a tail gun similar to American designs of the time. But that's it. So there really is no defending themselves should the USN decide to start launching missiles. But that's a problem that's already been passed. The Badger is about 70MPH faster than the fighters that were launched to intercept themFebruary 16, 1959
Over the Banda Sea
For this mission, the planes in the formation were being flown unarmed. They wanted to send a message, not start a war.
So how are they going to defend themselves if something happens.
Nice! Thank you!Mijdrecht, Karel Doorman and Limburg.
View of Mijdrecht from Karel Doorman.
Damn it. I thought she was faster than that with her having turbines.Mijdrecht had a top speed of 15 knots. That would limit your options.
Are you positive on that? FJ-4B routinely launched from H-8 cats.. This is a section from a book by an FJ-4 pilot that transitioned to A-4's later.. As I understand KD's cats they should be able to launch the Fury with at least a 2/3's bomb load and a full A2A one.February 18, 1959
Den Helder Naval Base, Netherlands
Karel Doorman's air group, along with the planes of 323 Squadron, are craned aboard the aircraft carrier. While the air group would normally fly out to their ship and trap aboard the carrier, the addition of the dozen Hawker Hunters tied down on every open inch of her flight deck made that impossible. Doorman will deploy to New Guinea with ten Grumman TBF Avengers and fourteen Hawker Sea Hawks with two Sikorsky S-55 Helicopters providing ASW and SAR. Though the Sea Hawks are considered obsolete, they are newly equipped with American Sidewinder infrared guided air-to-air missiles.
An urgent request to the United States for an emergency purchase of Douglas AD Skyraiders or A4D Skyhawks is declined, as the United States Navy does not have enough spare airframes to part with and still meet their own operational needs considering the increasing tensions in the South West Pacific. The United States does offer to provide a squadron's worth of FJ-4Bs to the Netherlands as that aircraft type is being retired from the fleet. But after looking at the weight and performance of the aircraft, the Royal Netherlands Navy is forced to decline, as Karel Doorman would be unable to launch the Fury with a useful bomb load.
Several objections are made to deploying the Doorman with strike aircraft that first saw service in World War Two, but political considerations overrule the operational concerns. The Netherlands has to be seen to respond to Indonesian aggression in the region, and the best, and indeed only, way to do so was by deploying a carrier battle group to the region.
But even with a slower speed then the Doorman, De Ruyter ore their escort, she is one valuable ship to have.Mijdrecht had a top speed of 15 knots. That would limit your options.
Yeah, that's why I needed the tanker with the force. Even the cruiser only has a range of 7,000nm at 12 knots. The only ship that could make a speed run to Cape Town without running dry (or from Cape Town to Fremantle) is the Doorman. I'll have to juggle the sailing times to reflect the restrictions imposed by needing tanker support to reach the area and the fact that the tanker can only make 15 knots.Range for the Friesland-class, from wiki, was 4,000 nautical miles at 20 knots. Straight line distance between Cape Town and Fremantle ~4,700 nautical miles. Tanker on station midway?
Huh. I was under the impression that the H-8 was not strong enough to launch an FJ-4B. Or at least not with anything even approaching a useful bomb load. I know Melbourne, when she was equipped with A-4s, only used them in an A2A role because the BS4 she was equipped with couldn't launch a Skyhawk when it was bombed up and I assumed that the Doorman would be similar given that the A-4E only had a MTOW that was a thousand pounds higher than the FJ-4 (and the Skyhawk had a much larger wing)Are you positive on that? FJ-4B routinely launched from H-8 cats.. This is a section from a book by an FJ-4 pilot that transitioned to A-4's later.. As I understand KD's cats they should be able to launch the Fury with at least a 2/3's bomb load and a full A2A one.February 18, 1959
Den Helder Naval Base, Netherlands
Karel Doorman's air group, along with the planes of 323 Squadron, are craned aboard the aircraft carrier. While the air group would normally fly out to their ship and trap aboard the carrier, the addition of the dozen Hawker Hunters tied down on every open inch of her flight deck made that impossible. Doorman will deploy to New Guinea with ten Grumman TBF Avengers and fourteen Hawker Sea Hawks with two Sikorsky S-55 Helicopters providing ASW and SAR. Though the Sea Hawks are considered obsolete, they are newly equipped with American Sidewinder infrared guided air-to-air missiles.
An urgent request to the United States for an emergency purchase of Douglas AD Skyraiders or A4D Skyhawks is declined, as the United States Navy does not have enough spare airframes to part with and still meet their own operational needs considering the increasing tensions in the South West Pacific. The United States does offer to provide a squadron's worth of FJ-4Bs to the Netherlands as that aircraft type is being retired from the fleet. But after looking at the weight and performance of the aircraft, the Royal Netherlands Navy is forced to decline, as Karel Doorman would be unable to launch the Fury with a useful bomb load.
Several objections are made to deploying the Doorman with strike aircraft that first saw service in World War Two, but political considerations overrule the operational concerns. The Netherlands has to be seen to respond to Indonesian aggression in the region, and the best, and indeed only, way to do so was by deploying a carrier battle group to the region.
Kearsarge was equipped with two of the old H-8 hydraulic catapults. To prepare for launch, you taxied onto the start of a 225-foot slot in the carrier’s deck that was the catapult track. A bridle made up of inch-thick steel wires was hooked to one point on each side of the plane’s fuselage (near the main mounts) and into the curved mouth on the front of the shuttle plate that rode the slot in the carrier’s deck. The shuttle was attached to a piston situated in a long tube underneath the catapult track.
The holdback fitting, a piece of ceramic that looked very much like a weight lifter’s dumbbell, was slipped into a slot under the plane’s tail and attached to the deck with another steel cable. The shuttle was then tensioned—hydraulics moved it forward until the bridle was taut. At this point, the plane squatted from the forward pressure of the shuttle fighting against the strength of the holdback fitting. A huge steel blast deflector, located a few feet behind the plane, was then raised up at a steep angle.
When the crew was ready to shoot you off the bow, the yellow-shirted catapult officer stepped over in front of your wing to prove you wouldn’t be fired off until you were ready. He then raised one arm over his head and twirled two fingers. You shoved the throttle forward to 100 percent power and grabbed a small metal rod that stuck out of the cockpit wall slightly ahead of the throttle. You held the throttle head and that metal rod together in your left hand to make sure that your hand, and the throttle, didn’t fly backward when the cat fired.
After a quick check of the engine instruments, you gave the cat officer a salute with your right hand. Then you tucked your right elbow into your gut and set your hand behind the stick; you didn’t want it to come back in your lap on the cat shot.
The cat officer stepped away from in front of your wing, fingers still twirling over his head, and made sure your path was clear. Then he made a balletlike sweeping motion that took him down on one knee, face and arm toward the bow. His outstretched fingers touched the deck…and the cat fired.
In that instant the hydraulic catapult distinguished itself from the more modern steam catapult. The “slug” that caught the shuttle and pushed you down the cat track started from a point about 20 feet behind your plane. It had accelerated to full bore by the time it picked up the shuttle—and you—on its way to the end of the track and a final speed of about 165 mph. When this force hit you, the holdback fitting snapped in two; it didn’t even slow the shuttle down.
The first time this happened, I blacked out. I woke up about 60 feet above the water, flying. I was so thrilled that I keyed the UHF radio button and yelled “Yah-hoo!”
FJ-4 and 4B had wing areas of 338 sq.ft A4 was 259... some of the limit on the A4 may be coming from how lightly framed she was, her maximum G load at launch I think was lower than some other aircraft.. not saying she wasn't a sturdy bird in combat but am kind of saying you could rip her face off easier than some others.Huh. I was under the impression that the H-8 was not strong enough to launch an FJ-4B. Or at least not with anything even approaching a useful bomb load. I know Melbourne, when she was equipped with A-4s, only used them in an A2A role because the BS4 she was equipped with couldn't launch a Skyhawk when it was bombed up and I assumed that the Doorman would be similar given that the A-4E only had a MTOW that was a thousand pounds higher than the FJ-4 (and the Skyhawk had a much larger wing)Are you positive on that? FJ-4B routinely launched from H-8 cats.. This is a section from a book by an FJ-4 pilot that transitioned to A-4's later.. As I understand KD's cats they should be able to launch the Fury with at least a 2/3's bomb load and a full A2A one.February 18, 1959
Den Helder Naval Base, Netherlands
Karel Doorman's air group, along with the planes of 323 Squadron, are craned aboard the aircraft carrier. While the air group would normally fly out to their ship and trap aboard the carrier, the addition of the dozen Hawker Hunters tied down on every open inch of her flight deck made that impossible. Doorman will deploy to New Guinea with ten Grumman TBF Avengers and fourteen Hawker Sea Hawks with two Sikorsky S-55 Helicopters providing ASW and SAR. Though the Sea Hawks are considered obsolete, they are newly equipped with American Sidewinder infrared guided air-to-air missiles.
An urgent request to the United States for an emergency purchase of Douglas AD Skyraiders or A4D Skyhawks is declined, as the United States Navy does not have enough spare airframes to part with and still meet their own operational needs considering the increasing tensions in the South West Pacific. The United States does offer to provide a squadron's worth of FJ-4Bs to the Netherlands as that aircraft type is being retired from the fleet. But after looking at the weight and performance of the aircraft, the Royal Netherlands Navy is forced to decline, as Karel Doorman would be unable to launch the Fury with a useful bomb load.
Several objections are made to deploying the Doorman with strike aircraft that first saw service in World War Two, but political considerations overrule the operational concerns. The Netherlands has to be seen to respond to Indonesian aggression in the region, and the best, and indeed only, way to do so was by deploying a carrier battle group to the region.
Kearsarge was equipped with two of the old H-8 hydraulic catapults. To prepare for launch, you taxied onto the start of a 225-foot slot in the carrier’s deck that was the catapult track. A bridle made up of inch-thick steel wires was hooked to one point on each side of the plane’s fuselage (near the main mounts) and into the curved mouth on the front of the shuttle plate that rode the slot in the carrier’s deck. The shuttle was attached to a piston situated in a long tube underneath the catapult track.
The holdback fitting, a piece of ceramic that looked very much like a weight lifter’s dumbbell, was slipped into a slot under the plane’s tail and attached to the deck with another steel cable. The shuttle was then tensioned—hydraulics moved it forward until the bridle was taut. At this point, the plane squatted from the forward pressure of the shuttle fighting against the strength of the holdback fitting. A huge steel blast deflector, located a few feet behind the plane, was then raised up at a steep angle.
When the crew was ready to shoot you off the bow, the yellow-shirted catapult officer stepped over in front of your wing to prove you wouldn’t be fired off until you were ready. He then raised one arm over his head and twirled two fingers. You shoved the throttle forward to 100 percent power and grabbed a small metal rod that stuck out of the cockpit wall slightly ahead of the throttle. You held the throttle head and that metal rod together in your left hand to make sure that your hand, and the throttle, didn’t fly backward when the cat fired.
After a quick check of the engine instruments, you gave the cat officer a salute with your right hand. Then you tucked your right elbow into your gut and set your hand behind the stick; you didn’t want it to come back in your lap on the cat shot.
The cat officer stepped away from in front of your wing, fingers still twirling over his head, and made sure your path was clear. Then he made a balletlike sweeping motion that took him down on one knee, face and arm toward the bow. His outstretched fingers touched the deck…and the cat fired.
In that instant the hydraulic catapult distinguished itself from the more modern steam catapult. The “slug” that caught the shuttle and pushed you down the cat track started from a point about 20 feet behind your plane. It had accelerated to full bore by the time it picked up the shuttle—and you—on its way to the end of the track and a final speed of about 165 mph. When this force hit you, the holdback fitting snapped in two; it didn’t even slow the shuttle down.
The first time this happened, I blacked out. I woke up about 60 feet above the water, flying. I was so thrilled that I keyed the UHF radio button and yelled “Yah-hoo!”
The question is, how much can Australia do without getting drawn into a shooting war? A war they don't want. They can maybe fly some recon flights or do something similar to the USN with a "freedom of navigation" exercise with Melbourne. But that's about it.I'm wondering if/when the Dutch might seek assistance from the likes of Australia? Perhaps Darwin and/or Butterworth based EE Canberras? See below for map showing these with a 2000km operational range:
View attachment 670601
A fully bombed-up A-4F Skyhawk (the model the Australian birds were modified from), while 3000 lbs lighter than a bombed-up FJ-4, has about the same stall speed on takeoff, which means in practice the differences in takeoff performance are surprisingly small.Huh. I was under the impression that the H-8 was not strong enough to launch an FJ-4B. Or at least not with anything even approaching a useful bomb load. I know Melbourne, when she was equipped with A-4s, only used them in an A2A role because the BS4 she was equipped with couldn't launch a Skyhawk when it was bombed up and I assumed that the Doorman would be similar given that the A-4E only had a MTOW that was a thousand pounds higher than the FJ-4 (and the Skyhawk had a much larger wing)