Quite frankly, the model is gorgeous, and I am happy Hesham did post it.
The models are excellent and reasonably priced

Any livery of your choice is available.
 
I speedily found that; never saw any internal picture of the domestic version. Will try to find some more info.

View attachment 723923View attachment 723924
Thanks for looking. I have always been curious as to the design of the 321 passenger B2707-300 7 abreast model, especially we have all seen multiple stages of the 5 abreast prototype and the 6 abreast commercial versions. I figure if there is an illustration or model it's at the Boeing Archives. Even aviation week doesn't have anything. I tried to do it myself and I realized I should never try that again.
 
Untitled.jpg
I apologize for this hideous cropping but someone else that I personally know didn't understand what I meant by high capacity domestic model. This is it. This would have been American's NY to LA route as example. Or Easterns's NY to FL. Coupled with the last minute idea of turbofans and downgrade to mach 2.2 I've always thought this would have sold as many models as the 234 passenger 5 abreast one. Again I apologize for the high school level crop.
 
View attachment 726062
Has anyone ever seen a line drawing, plan, model or anything of the Boeing 2707-300 wide body 7 abreast 321 passenger variant? We have all seen the 280 foot 234 passenger, 286 foot 258 passenger, and the 298 foot 298 passenger versions. So I'm thinking Their had to be at least one illustration of the high capacity domestic variant.
I think I found one illustration of the domestic version. It does fit the dimensions even though it is an artistic illustration. It's from the Boeing promo "You, me, and the SST". You can find it on Youtube. But if anyone is still looking please continue.
 

Attachments

  • Opera Snapshot_2024-04-19_043212_www.youtube.com.png
    Opera Snapshot_2024-04-19_043212_www.youtube.com.png
    349.5 KB · Views: 114
Article by John M. Swihart, Assistant Chief Engineer, SST Product Development Technology, The Boring Company, Seattle.
 

Attachments

  • BoeSST p1.jpg
    BoeSST p1.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 90
  • BoeSST p2.jpg
    BoeSST p2.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 85
  • BoeSST p3.jpg
    BoeSST p3.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 82
  • BoeSST p4.jpg
    BoeSST p4.jpg
    963.4 KB · Views: 73
  • BoeSST p5.jpg
    BoeSST p5.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 80
  • BoeSST p6.jpg
    BoeSST p6.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 78
  • BoeSST p7.jpg
    BoeSST p7.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 86
A short summary for Boeotians like me ... Young teenager in the 60 I followed with passion this development of the SST US and the Boeing 2707 was a fabulous wonder ! Concorde was just a toy ... :)
 
A short summary for Boeotians like me ... Young teenager in the 60 I followed with passion this development of the SST US and the Boeing 2707 was a fabulous wonder ! Concorde was just a toy ... :)
Such a shame it didn't come to pass, even as overwater-only flights.
 
From Boeing magazine 1963
 

Attachments

  • 20.png
    20.png
    654.3 KB · Views: 62
  • 21.png
    21.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 59
  • 22.png
    22.png
    2 MB · Views: 50
  • 23.png
    23.png
    2 MB · Views: 46
  • 24.png
    24.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 44
  • 25.png
    25.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 68
Last edited:
I have come to the conclusion that the sketch of the 2707-300 that shows up in the promo You, me, and the SST is the only visual of the 321 passenger Domestic variant. I use the 2707-200s rendering as example. The severe area ruling and 2-3-2 wide body double aisle fuselage are identical. I use the 2-3 single isle 234/250 passenger version as an example of how different the two variants are. unless somebody finds another rendering or blueprint this is the large variants only representation I have ever seen.
 

Attachments

  • Opera Snapshot_2024-04-19_043212_www.youtube.com.png
    Opera Snapshot_2024-04-19_043212_www.youtube.com.png
    349.5 KB · Views: 66
  • S-2274.jpg
    S-2274.jpg
    91.8 KB · Views: 69
  • cp_air_sst copy.jpg
    cp_air_sst copy.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 90
I have come to the conclusion that the sketch of the 2707-300 that shows up in the promo You, me, and the SST is the only visual of the 321 passenger Domestic variant. I use the 2707-200s rendering as example. The severe area ruling and 2-3-2 wide body double aisle fuselage are identical. I use the 2-3 single isle 234/250 passenger version as an example of how different the two variants are. unless somebody finds another rendering or blueprint this is the large variants only representation I have ever seen.
Interesting, are you planning a 3d model of the variant ?
 
I have come to the conclusion that the sketch of the 2707-300 that shows up in the promo You, me, and the SST is the only visual of the 321 passenger Domestic variant. I use the 2707-200s rendering as example. The severe area ruling and 2-3-2 wide body double aisle fuselage are identical. I use the 2-3 single isle 234/250 passenger version as an example of how different the two variants are. unless somebody finds another rendering or blueprint this is the large variants only representation I have ever seen.
Yeah, I have a PDF of the 2707-300 General Characteristics handbook (pretty sure I got it from this thread!), but it doesn't show a seating layout for the 321pax version. Just that basically the entire fuselage would be different between that version and the 234pax arrangement.

That PDF does show seating for the 298pax all-tourist class. Mostly 3+3, with 3+2 at the ends.
 
This is outside the timeframe of this thread so mods can remove if not relevant but I found this 1947 turbojet, ramjet and rocket powered NACA design interesting.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (8601).png
    Screenshot (8601).png
    336.7 KB · Views: 95

Attachments

  • 15.png
    15.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 70
  • 14.png
    14.png
    303.8 KB · Views: 66
  • 13.png
    13.png
    348.1 KB · Views: 56
  • 12.png
    12.png
    247.2 KB · Views: 63
  • 11.png
    11.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 72
  • 10.png
    10.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 75
  • 16.png
    16.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 71
  • 17.png
    17.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 65
  • 18.png
    18.png
    735.3 KB · Views: 58
  • 19.png
    19.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 56
  • 20.png
    20.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 70
...
 

Attachments

  • 1_ba6ef99d1dfb7957d70603f91405a408.jpg
    1_ba6ef99d1dfb7957d70603f91405a408.jpg
    145.4 KB · Views: 63
  • 1_05c8e5d792341627d188ccfbe279bf5e (1).jpg
    1_05c8e5d792341627d188ccfbe279bf5e (1).jpg
    118.6 KB · Views: 70
  • 1_05c8e5d792341627d188ccfbe279bf5e.jpg
    1_05c8e5d792341627d188ccfbe279bf5e.jpg
    104.8 KB · Views: 68
  • 1_32b3c86b8f82626f32515391fac19e31 (1).jpg
    1_32b3c86b8f82626f32515391fac19e31 (1).jpg
    108.8 KB · Views: 72
  • 1_32b3c86b8f82626f32515391fac19e31.jpg
    1_32b3c86b8f82626f32515391fac19e31.jpg
    114.7 KB · Views: 74

Attachments

  • 5a3d753a-af20-4153-ae67-ab14fb375d9e.jpg
    5a3d753a-af20-4153-ae67-ab14fb375d9e.jpg
    198.9 KB · Views: 55
  • d9404bf0-dbe4-436c-8fa0-f0dd3a6ff96b.jpg
    d9404bf0-dbe4-436c-8fa0-f0dd3a6ff96b.jpg
    648.2 KB · Views: 50
  • 4143b5b2-0857-4ec5-bf88-b8a8eb8e042a.jpg
    4143b5b2-0857-4ec5-bf88-b8a8eb8e042a.jpg
    912 KB · Views: 50
  • 750ecdd4-6d02-482d-ad77-28722b2c0bb6.jpg
    750ecdd4-6d02-482d-ad77-28722b2c0bb6.jpg
    918.3 KB · Views: 47
  • eeb30a7f-413b-4fc4-adea-96e062159e11.jpg
    eeb30a7f-413b-4fc4-adea-96e062159e11.jpg
    720.9 KB · Views: 47
  • 63c97fcd-00fe-4bd6-b952-26aa5e56f724.jpg
    63c97fcd-00fe-4bd6-b952-26aa5e56f724.jpg
    1,014.2 KB · Views: 48
  • 5e6e4d82-3231-4256-9ee5-217a31b46169.jpg
    5e6e4d82-3231-4256-9ee5-217a31b46169.jpg
    883.2 KB · Views: 48
  • 368d5eca-6ad6-48b8-b2cf-ea364280c78e.jpg
    368d5eca-6ad6-48b8-b2cf-ea364280c78e.jpg
    774.9 KB · Views: 48
  • 59892323-009a-425d-8fee-f0b983c94e2c.jpg
    59892323-009a-425d-8fee-f0b983c94e2c.jpg
    522.3 KB · Views: 48
  • 1ba278fd-98ea-4603-aec9-7630bd519bf7.jpg
    1ba278fd-98ea-4603-aec9-7630bd519bf7.jpg
    686 KB · Views: 49
  • cf2dab04-1346-457a-9d91-a50c3dd8664f.jpg
    cf2dab04-1346-457a-9d91-a50c3dd8664f.jpg
    416.9 KB · Views: 48
  • 7b7cdb09-374a-47e6-88ca-1ea7473c1dac.jpg
    7b7cdb09-374a-47e6-88ca-1ea7473c1dac.jpg
    820.6 KB · Views: 57
  • 077d2f19-27be-41d3-8505-c808c1e9a335.jpg
    077d2f19-27be-41d3-8505-c808c1e9a335.jpg
    133.7 KB · Views: 67

Attachments

  • boeing-2707-mockup.jpg
    boeing-2707-mockup.jpg
    438 KB · Views: 73
  • boeing-sst-concorde-tu144.jpg
    boeing-sst-concorde-tu144.jpg
    308.5 KB · Views: 73
  • s8L8Qb-Small-image-48.jpg
    s8L8Qb-Small-image-48.jpg
    435.5 KB · Views: 72
Hi!
Boeing's early SST study model and 2707-300 mockup.

 

Attachments

  • Boeing early sst study model.jpg
    Boeing early sst study model.jpg
    984.3 KB · Views: 52
  • 2707-300.jpg
    2707-300.jpg
    692.6 KB · Views: 61

Attachments

  • ETwKCGWXYAEWP8L.jpg
    ETwKCGWXYAEWP8L.jpg
    250.5 KB · Views: 48
  • 297487143_737097603935572_8179421023208847920_n.jpg
    297487143_737097603935572_8179421023208847920_n.jpg
    204.9 KB · Views: 41
  • maxresdefault.jpg
    maxresdefault.jpg
    116.1 KB · Views: 52
Last edited:
I think Boeing is uncomfortable to be talked about its failures all the time.
If Boeing itself thoroughly investigates the causes of the failure and compiles and publishes them in a report, the public will be convinced to some extent, but since most of the people involved at the time have died, the verification process may not be easy. The FAA is partly responsible, but it will not be able to cooperate with the verification process.
 

Attachments

  • 1968111847_3.jpg
    1968111847_3.jpg
    267.5 KB · Views: 48
  • 1968121658_1.jpg
    1968121658_1.jpg
    87.6 KB · Views: 44
  • 1968120918_4.jpg
    1968120918_4.jpg
    168.4 KB · Views: 44
  • 1968120918_5.jpg
    1968120918_5.jpg
    92.5 KB · Views: 43
  • 1971012528_1.jpg
    1971012528_1.jpg
    140.6 KB · Views: 47
  • 1968120918_3.jpg
    1968120918_3.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 43
  • 1968120922_4.jpg
    1968120922_4.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 54
Interesting, are you planning a 3d model of the variant ?
Oh God no. It would look awful. I leave that to you. Your work on the 2707 variants are masterpieces in artwork. I wish you would render a version of the 2707-300 7 abreast one day.
 
Interesting, are you planning a 3d model of the variant ?
Oh God no. It would look awful. I leave that to you. Your work on the 2707 variants are masterpieces in artwork. I wish you would render a version of the 2707-300 7 abreast one day. Hint, Hint. 10-19-2024
 
Oh God no. It would look awful. I leave that to you. Your work on the 2707 variants are masterpieces in artwork. I wish you would render a version of the 2707-300 7 abreast one day. Hint, Hint. 10-19-2024
Thanks for the kind words. But what do you mean with "Hint, hint" ? :)
 
I always thought the 2707-300 was ugly as sin compared to the variable-sweep 100/200 versions, and -you won't find this in contemporary literature- the cruise speed for the -300 was reduced in steps from mach 2.7 to mach 2.62 as the program neared the finish line.
The SCAT-15F was superior in every way.
 
A hint for you to do a rendering of the B2707-300 7 abreast 321 passenger version. It is a variant none of us have ever seen.
Oh I see :) Well I've not played with that 2707-300 model for a while. Last time was 2 years ago I did a touch and go at Edward AFB whatif vid:
Will have to redo a -300 at one point anyway, but as a 1/144 scale model, so will see of a 321 seats type is doable... Already did a 1/200 scale version, will post images in the models section if interested.
 
Oh I see :) Well I've not played with that 2707-300 model for a while. Last time was 2 years ago I did a touch and go at Edward AFB whatif vid:
Will have to redo a -300 at one point anyway, but as a 1/144 scale model, so will see of a 321 seats type is doable... Already did a 1/200 scale version, will post images in the models section if interested.
VERY interested! Thanks ahead of time if and when you do a rendering or anything else on the subject. Your art is spectacular in accuracy and style.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom