TAI TF-X / Milli Muharip Uçak MMU Kaan

EmoBirb said:
So how is 6-7 years an "ambitious but fair" timeline? Domestic development and production of military spec engines is arguably one of the most difficult and costly things to master.
Click to expand...

The TF35000 program to develop a domestic engine for KAAN started in 2017, it's been 8 years, it'll be another 6-7 years until the engine is fully developed. Overall the engine development programme is 15 years - if what the GM is saying comes to fruition.

The context and knowing the history of the project is important.
 
TRmotor got established in 2017 but the actual detailed work on the engine started in 2023 after various (conceptual) designs from both domestic and foreign companies competed against each other. TEI and TRMotor design won against a foreign company likely to be Ivchenko Progress.

2025+6/7 years equals 2031-2032. In that case the engine development will take just 8-9 years to be "fully developed" starting from 2023.
But what does the CEO define under "fully develop"? I hope it means ready for serial production and not just ready to be flight tested or God forbid, ready to be fired up.

The problem for the Turks is not so much design as it is materials as stated by Demir. Indigenization of the entire chain of various alloys is being worked on from mining, to processing to casting and forging.

Design is easy these days when one has a solid grasp of the fundamentals of what one is designing. Simulation software and supercomputers can churn out lots of data in a short time.

And do not forget the Turkish turbomachinery sector is tied to the Western one and lots of shoulder have been rubbed in the last 3-4 decades.
 
Last edited:
Null said:
I think 2018 was the test flight date for the AL-51 and supposedly it will be on the Su-57's that will be produced this year which in total is a time span of 7 years, in other words 6-7 years seems feasible for the KAAN
Click to expand...
It took NPO Saturn, a firm with extensive history designing and deploying fighter class turbofan engines at the minimum 7 years from test flight to service, and nearly 2 decades from initial conception to service. While the infantile Turkish turbofan industry which has only indigenously designed a 6,000 lb class turbofan engine that ran it's first test in 2024, wants to complete a heavy afterburning turbofan engine with 29,000 lb's of thrust in 6-7 years?

Call me crazy, but that sounds a little bit too unrealistic.
 
EmoBirb said:
6-7 years seems rather ambitious
Click to expand...
From this point onwards, though. The engine development is shrouded in secrecy more than the aircraft development ever was.

We don’t quite know when they started working on the engine. We believe that it has to have started around 2018—which, justifiably, still makes it an ambitious timeline to a lesser degree, but they did manage to achieve most of their ambitions in time so far.

In the case of a major delay, my only criticism would be why they started working on it so late, when they could have developed it alongside the aircraft design as it matured.
 
Scott Kenny said:
Indonesia really could benefit from Kaan over the other options, especially if Kaan has a nice range (or can get some nice big 2400L stealthy external fuel tanks)
Click to expand...
From an old presentation at Anatolian Eagle '21: (there are lots of changes but it is still useful)

60dd81f0479a6.jpg
60dd81f047506.jpg
60dd81f047f7d.jpg
60dd81f048da2.jpg
60dd81f046fc0.jpg
60dd81f0465b7.jpg
60dd81f046c70.jpg
 
Last edited:
Unless we get clear signs that the engine has taken test flights by this year or next year, entering service by 2032 will be a pipe dream. But I'm unaware of the secrecy of Turkish defense products as they often are announced alongside videos with crappy music. You can call me pessimistic but unless they are squeaky clean, a brand new jet engine from an inexperienced firm will definitely run into some teething issues.
 
If there is a will to do it, it will be done, and if there is capability behind the will, it gets done even faster. How many times will we need to "be surprised" that a "lesser nation" demonstrated "remarkable progress" before we learn the lesson that acting dismissively towards disagreeable prospects only hurts ourselves?
 
Nx4eu said:
It took NPO Saturn, a firm with extensive history designing and deploying fighter class turbofan engines at the minimum 7 years from test flight to service, and nearly 2 decades from initial conception to service. While the infantile Turkish turbofan industry which has only indigenously designed a 6,000 lb class turbofan engine that ran it's first test in 2024, wants to complete a heavy afterburning turbofan engine with 29,000 lb's of thrust in 6-7 years?

Call me crazy, but that sounds a little bit too unrealistic.
Click to expand...

Nx4eu said:
Unless we get clear signs that the engine has taken test flights by this year or next year, entering service by 2032 will be a pipe dream. But I'm unaware of the secrecy of Turkish defense products as they often are announced alongside videos with crappy music. You can call me pessimistic but unless they are squeaky clean, a brand new jet engine from an inexperienced firm will definitely run into some teething issues.
Click to expand...

See: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...cks-and-propulsion-projects.34734/post-748493

And as always, time will tell.
 
Deino said:
Let's wait and see ... they have to prove their IMO overambitious claims, not we have to explain them again why it is unlikely.

And even more flight test is only the last part of the development, so since the Turkish side so far has nothing built and even bench tested yet that is at least close to something that can be tested in flight, it is IMO totally unrealistic. But let's wait.
Click to expand...
Apologies I completely forgot about the bench test
 
bennyp said:
If there is a will to do it, it will be done, and if there is capability behind the will, it gets done even faster. How many times will we need to "be surprised" that a "lesser nation" demonstrated "remarkable progress" before we learn the lesson that acting dismissively towards disagreeable prospects only hurts ourselves?
Click to expand...
Nobody said it can't be done, it's just that timelines are often hugely optimistic. How many of these "lesser nations" have successfully designed and deployed indigenous fighter class turbofan jet engines? Even the major nations have needed huge time and monetary commitments to successfully develop such things. You literally can't compare development timelines of anything else to the insurmountable challenge of engine creation. Sure many lesser nations have quickly designed many other weapon systems faster and can rival systems of major powers, however those technologies aren't as safely guarded nor as difficult to build as jet engines. I would be comparing fighter jet engines to semiconductors in terms of difficulty to produce, not other military systems and subsystems.
 
Nx4eu said:
Nobody said it can't be done, it's just that timelines are often hugely optimistic. How many of these "lesser nations" have successfully designed and deployed indigenous fighter class turbofan jet engines? Even the major nations have needed huge time and monetary commitments to successfully develop such things. You literally can't compare development timelines of anything else to the insurmountable challenge of engine creation. Sure many lesser nations have quickly designed many other weapon systems faster and can rival systems of major powers, however those technologies aren't as safely guarded nor as difficult to build as jet engines. I would be comparing fighter jet engines to semiconductors in terms of difficulty to produce, not other military systems and subsystems.
Click to expand...
Fighter engines are materials, materials and materials first. Then design.

The Turks got it covered.
 
Canardzz said:
Nose lg and the mains are a bit different in comparison.
Click to expand...

They changed it when P0 was configured for flight tests, you can see the two fork front landing gears in the first and second flight tests of P0 from past year | at this point, I don't see them doing much to P0 if anything we should see optimisations on P1 and perhaps might trickle down to P0 ?
1744903209144.png 1744902981047.png
 
snne said:
I'm obviously aware of that. What he's purely speculating is a switch to yet another visually different landing gear, which is, of course, not true as of yet.

View attachment 767104

No smoke, no fire...
Click to expand...
I'm speculating a switch to a newly produced landing gear. Judging by the different primer and a different looking side strut.
 
Geo said:
Oh oh, of course. Just a moment of patience please. First we need to save up for Su-35SEs, F-15IDs and of course Rafales. No one will be left behind.
Click to expand...
It is clear that the Indonesian procurement programme is really fucked up and it’s choices are just pushed by politics.

Now, pardon me for my ignorance in deep technical details and knowledge, but.

In my opinion, the big fuck up for Indonesia was the Rafale.
It's completely distinct from the Sukhois and F-16s they operate. It's also very expensive.
Given the KAI T-50s in service, imo the FA-50 and KF-21 combo would have made the most sense, retiring the F-16s and Flankers after the KF-21s were introduced.
Maybe, convincing Russia to upgrading the Su-30s to SM2 standards and get AShMs, as anti-ship aircraft, anyway having a heavy multirole.

Either way, in my opinion the Rafale was a mistake with very little value for Indonesia. Sure it's capable, no denial here, but it's very expensive, has a completely unique weapons ecosystem and basically occupies the same role as two other in service jet types already.


(Also sorry if this might be OT)
 
Last edited:
Combat-Master said:
KARAT IRST brochure
View attachment 755395
Click to expand...
I know this is a bit of necroposting but how does the passive range estimation work? With in tandem with EOTS Toygun or some kind of system that tries to triangulate within 2 different time and space frames as it would know the speed and position of the host aircraft and as the enemy is still moving, it would be an estimation rather than a precise measurement.


Any idea from electronics guys?
 
Combat-Master said:
TAI Large Subsonic Acoustic Wind Tunnel to be completed by 2023

Once the wind tunnel is completed, it is expected to serve the Turkish Fighter (MMU) first. The tunnel will then undertake important tasks in the testing stages of all platforms developed by Turkish Aerospace. The tunnel is also planned to execute tests for aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles, armed unmanned aerial vehicles, drones, ammunitions, missile systems, automobiles, race cars, trucks, radar systems, wind turbines, panels, traffic structures, construction structures, and bridges. During all tests, the newest techniques of particle image velocimetry will be used alongside classical methods such as special cameras, oil flow, and tuft tests to visualize the airflow. The Large Subsonic Acoustic Wind Tunnel, which will play an important role in indigenous product development, will increase the design capability of Turkish Aerospace in the development of air platforms. It will also contribute to the development of a domestic industry
View attachment 644044
• Single stage acoustic fan with 14.5 MW power
• A closed test section with a 6.4 m x 4.8 m test section. The maximum air speed in the test section is 126 m/s.
• A closed test section with a test section of 4.9 m x 3.7 m. The maximum air speed in the test section is 181 m/s.
• An open test section with a 6.4 m x 4.8 m test section. The maximum air speed in the test section is 107 m/s.
Click to expand...

1745579148204.png
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom