- Joined
- 1 April 2006
- Messages
- 11,052
- Reaction score
- 8,492
sferrin said:More like "Fanart-ski"
Well, was Ucon an unreliable source ever? Plus, -72 should say you that it could be not the final iteration.
sferrin said:More like "Fanart-ski"
flateric said:exactly
well, rumors of pump-my-ride Su-30 were close to reality...
flateric said:some work shops working for 3 days a week, flight test sation - 4 days a week
to get salary of ~800 bucks, you need to work something with three free days total in January, according to insiders
This is a wrong drawing obviously, the drawer didn't think if the PAK-FA was drawn as all-movable vertical fin like this, how does its horizontal tailplane deflect?ucon said:Sukhoi T-50-72
No comments
sanjeev.k said:Have found some interesting similarities between this CAD image of the CalPoly 'Vendetta' concept and the TsNII RCS 4-view CAD images of the PAK-FA
leaked few years back (the images are attached here).
overscan said:Another PAK-FA drawing.
And what magazine that said f-35 or f-22 are superior than the T-50? And how do you know that CIA don't know a thing? Do you know some Russian media claimed the su-47 to be true fifth generation fighter ready for order when it turned out to be a testbed, or that the mig 1.44 to have lower RCS and superior than f-22 when it turned out to be a dead end project and that the aircraft probably sit in the hanger for quite long?T-50 said:the problem with most westerners ,especially the US they think always that good designs of non
American orgine are copycats.(offcourse bullshit!!!)
In US magazines they wrote that the F-35 and F-22 will be superior to the T-50,quit arrogant i say.
They havent seen the new fighter jet and cant know its performance (even the CIA knows not ever
thing)
I say the new jet will be a nasty shock for the Americans,and air superiorty is not only for the USAF
anymore. I welcome the day that the first photos of the new aircraft will be released.
T-50 said:the problem with most westerners ,especially the US they think always that good designs of non
American orgine are copycats.(offcourse bullshit!!!) In US magazines they wrote that the F-35 and F-22 will be superior to the T-50,quit arrogant i say. They havent seen the new fighter jet and cant know its performance (even the CIA knows not ever thing) I say the new jet will be a nasty shock for the Americans,and air superiorty is not only for the USAF anymore. I welcome the day that the first photos of the new aircraft will be released.
overscan said:T-50 said:the problem with most westerners ,especially the US they think always that good designs of non
American orgine are copycats.(offcourse bullshit!!!) In US magazines they wrote that the F-35 and F-22 will be superior to the T-50,quit arrogant i say. They havent seen the new fighter jet and cant know its performance (even the CIA knows not ever thing) I say the new jet will be a nasty shock for the Americans,and air superiorty is not only for the USAF anymore. I welcome the day that the first photos of the new aircraft will be released.
I assume English is not your first language but please try to spell a bit better. Use the Spell Check button built in to the forum software.
I would also suggest that your assertion that the T-50 will be a "nasty shock" is at just as unsupported with evidence as your alleged "US magazines" opinion. It is hard for me to see how, given the underfunding of various essential core technologies from 1990 onwards in Russia, the PAK-FA will truly surpass the F-22 except possibly in airshow manouvres.
T-50 said:the problem with most westerners ,especially the US they think always that good designs of non
American orgine are copycats.(offcourse bullshit!!!)
overscan said:I assume English is not your first language but please try to spell a bit better. Use the Spell Check button built in to the forum software.
I would also suggest that your assertion that the T-50 will be a "nasty shock" is at just as unsupported with evidence as your alleged "US magazines" opinion. It is hard for me to see how, given the underfunding of various essential core technologies from 1990 onwards in Russia, the PAK-FA will truly surpass the F-22 except possibly in outmanoeuvres.
KJ_Lesnick said:While I know these questions are not all answerable I could use any answers available. This is not meant to sponge, but simply to get a nice simple idea of the PAK-FA's capabilities and how they compare to the F-22.
Maneuverability wise how would you say that the PAK-FA's max-speed, cruise-speed, instantaneous, sustained maneuverability, roll-rate, and high-alpha capability would compare to the F-22 and F-35?
Radar/Sensor and Electronics wise, how would you say the radar capability, IR-systems, and sensor-fusion capability would compare with our F-22 and F-35?
KJ
KJ_Lesnick said:While I know these questions are not all answerable I could use any answers available. This is not meant to sponge, but simply to get a nice simple idea of the PAK-FA's capabilities and how they compare to the F-22.
Maneuverability wise how would you say that the PAK-FA's max-speed, cruise-speed, instantaneous, sustained maneuverability, roll-rate, and high-alpha capability would compare to the F-22 and F-35?
Radar/Sensor and Electronics wise, how would you say the radar capability, IR-systems, and sensor-fusion capability would compare with our F-22 and F-35?
KJ