- Joined
- 3 June 2011
- Messages
- 17,929
- Reaction score
- 11,110
Until they decide it needs to be. Lots of things "couldn't be done" and then they built bigger cranes. Necessity is the mother of invention.not cost effectively
Until they decide it needs to be. Lots of things "couldn't be done" and then they built bigger cranes. Necessity is the mother of invention.not cost effectively
oddly Convair NOVA studies were mostly reusable, including NEXUSUntil they decide it needs to be. Lots of things "couldn't be done" and then they built bigger cranes. Necessity is the mother of invention.
... Hope is not enough. SpaceX and other companies, as well as governments, are producing space debris that could very easily kill people. Countries need to enforce the rules that already exist, and regulations need to be updated to account for the unprecedented numbers of launches and reentries now occurring.
The hundreds of pounds of space debris that fell near my home were a clear warning. To avoid disaster, the nations of the world must heed it, and catch up with the reality of today’s commercialization of orbit before it’s too late.
This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.
Samantha Lawler is an associate professor of astronomy at the University of Regina in Saskatchewan, Canada, where she researches orbital dynamics and teaches. She lives on a farm, raising goats and cherishing the huge prairie sky.
And almost on cue, Falcon upper stage comes apart.July 11, 2024
12 min read
A New, Deadly Era of Space Junk Is Dawning, and No One Is Ready
did not see it "come apart". Looks like they had a big tank leak but if it would have "come apart" they wouldn't have been able to deploy their payload at all. (Unlike Ariane 6.)And almost on cue, Falcon upper stage comes apart.
Funny how that works out.
SpaceX has an incredible track record with Falcon9. I can say from personal experience they are very transparent when issues arise. I have no doubt they will arrive at a cause quickly and ensure the most cost-effective and reliable launch vehicle keeps delivering payload to orbit. As for Polaris Dawn, we will fly whenever SpaceX is ready and with complete confidence in the rocket, spaceship and operations
Thanks Jared. We will investigate the issue and look for any other potential near-misses.
We are tracking to do more Falcon flights this year than Shuttle did in 30 years, the vast majority of which are uncrewed.
A major advantage of this super high flight rate is that we can identify and resolve problems that may only occur once every 1000 flights. This is impossible on a low flight rate vehicle.
Especially as it’s manned rated they could do nothing else. Considering the state of alternative launchers at this time this will effectively ground US space for now. Vulcan’s next certification launch isn’t until September. Also knock onto Europe as Ariane 6 is still in very early stages and has its own issues. This failure couldn’t have come at a worse time.View: https://x.com/BCCarCounters/status/1811769572552310799
The FAA requires an investigation on the mishap and grounds Falcon 9 for now
A major advantage of this super high flight rate is that we can identify and resolve problems that may only occur once every 1000 flights. This is impossible on a low flight rate vehicle.
A low flight rate may never have the problem that occurs once every 1000 flights.Ya know, Musk has a point there,
The team made contact with 10 of the satellites and attempted to have them raise orbit using their ion thrusters, but they are in an enormously high-drag environment with their perigee, or lowest point of their elliptical orbit, only 135 km above the Earth
Each pass through perigee removes 5+ km of altitude from the highest point in the satellite orbit. At this level of drag, our maximum available thrust is unlikely to be enough to successfully raise the satellites.
As such, the satellites will re-enter Earth’s atmosphere and fully demise. They do not pose a threat to other satellites in orbit or to public safety.
But likely to have other problems from moving too slow.A low flight rate may never have the problem that occurs once every 1000 flights.
Last night during a routine Falcon 9 Starlink launch the vehicle experienced an anomaly with the upper stage. This led to an unsuccessful second burn and a deployment of the satellites into a lower-than-intended orbit. To put in perspective how rare this is for the company, it marks the first Falcon 9 failure in around 7 years after an over 300 mission success streak.
Importantly, the FAA has issued a few statements regarding an investigation and a note that SpaceX won’t be flying the vehicle until the agency has confirmed it’s safe to do so. With quite a few Falcon 9 missions scheduled in the near future, this could have a decent impact on future launch dates. Here I will go more in-depth into the FAA’s statement, the Falcon 9 anomaly, upcoming missions, and more.
For more space-related content check out - https://thespacebucket.com/https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...Q&q=https://thespacebucket.com/&v=4-c3z1TJHLc
That too low, Those Starlinks will reenter Earth atmosphere in coming weeksbut they are in an enormously high-drag environment with their perigee, or lowest point of their elliptical orbit, only 135 km above the Earth
That too low, Those Starlinks will reenter Earth atmosphere in coming weeks
NASA Statement on the Falcon 9 Second Stage issue:
"Although the SpaceX Starlink launch was a fully commercial mission, NASA receives insight from SpaceX on all items of interest about the Falcon 9 rocket, as part of the agency’s standard fleet following activities. Crew safety and mission assurance are top priorities for NASA. SpaceX has been forthcoming with information and is including NASA in the company’s ongoing anomaly investigation to understand the issue and path forward. NASA will provide updates on agency missions including potential schedule impacts, if any, as more information becomes available."
Self insured for their own stuff.Yup! SpaceX will be filing a big insurance claim with whoever insures their launch-rockets and satellite payloads.
Falcon 9 returning to Port of Long Beach this morning after releasing a faulty MVac on July 11 during the Starlink 9-3 mission. The second stage developed a liquid oxygen leak leaving it unable to complete its second burn. Although the satellites were deployed, they were unable to reach proper altitude and will eventually break apart in Earth’s atmosphere. Should be quite a show in a dark sky!
The First Stage is not the Probleme, its payload !Also just Realize something.
It was the SECOND STAGE that had the failure.
Not the first stage.
The secondary stage is the expendable one, it always a new fresh built rocket since they get used up in launch.
The first stage apparently rtb just fine.
Throw in that this is the second F9 second stage failure in like 10 years?
Unless it an semi obvious quality control failure it likely to be a one off we have no clue how that happened deal.
Based on the @SpaceX ephemeris-based SupGP data, all 20 Starlink satellites from Group 9-3 reached orbit, so I have added notional entries to the CelesTrak SATCAT for now & will adjust, if necessary. All are predicted to have decayed Jul 12/early Jul 13 (awaiting confirmation).
Earlier today only a bit over a month since the last Starship flight, SpaceX completed a full-duration booster static fire. With this, they provided multiple angles and videos of the event along with a handful of photos. Now that this static fire is complete, there are only a few more milestones and steps before Flight 5 of Starship.
In theory, based on a few comments from both Musk and the company, this could end up being the first booster to return to the launch site and attempt a catch. Here I will go more in-depth into this morning’s static fire, what else needs to be completed, the upcoming launch, and more.
For more space-related content check out -
https://thespacebucket.com/https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...A&q=https://thespacebucket.com/&v=w-PgT2ODmrQ
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbHZ1M0ZYRVd3ZkVqVjBSenRmZlVuYU9CVHJXQXxBQ3Jtc0ttcFAyYjJJbG1HeEF5aWQxeElVZFp4RHZ3YS1HU0lydDM1MW4zdjZoS2hGSnBUZTEzZEg0dl8yeEEtR0Eyc0Z6Z0hxd3puWGRYczducjJsUmFpQ09ITzJ4TzF4eW01NjItVVZIX2tNem9qZWdjYTdsOA&q=https://thespacebucket.com/&v=w-PgT2ODmrQ
View: https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1812990982842958018A Falcon 9 Stage 2 was just tested at McGregor. This is the first one since the Starlink 9-3 anomaly and could be a good sign of SpaceX's progress with the investigation.
nsf.live/mcgregor
@NASASpaceflight
Breaking news: Space Force has cataloged two objects from Group 9-3 launch that are still in orbit, in 182 x 296 km and 177 x 274 km orbits. Did the argon thrusters managed to save at least two of the sats? But there are no SupTLEs from these objects, suggesting they're dead
Statement from the @FAANews about the SpaceX Falcon 9 annomaly, and the now started safety investigation:
"The FAA is responsible for and committed to protecting the public during commercial space transportation launch and reentry operations. On July 15, SpaceX requested that the FAA make a public safety determination as part of the ongoing investigation of the Starlink Group 9-3 anomaly. The FAA is reviewing the request and will be guided by data and safety at every step of the process.
When a public safety determination request is received, the agency evaluates safety-critical systems, the nature and consequences of the anomaly, the adequacy of existing flight safety analysis, safety organization performance, and environmental factors. If the FAA agrees no public safety issues were involved, the operator may return to flight while the investigation remains open, provided all other license requirements are met.
The FAA responding to NSF
You have a strange definition of "full of shit".Personally I think that Elon Musk is a very strange weirdo who's full of shit.
looking on what he achieve:Personally I think that Elon Musk is a very strange weirdo who's full of shit.