blackkite
Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
- Joined
- 31 May 2007
- Messages
- 8,600
- Reaction score
- 6,862
And "132". Not delta wing?
blackkite said:Hi! Is this a Douglas WS-125A proposal?
"Douglas Model 26 ‘Atomic Bomber’
A wooden, in-house Douglas model of a proposed nuclear powered bomber for the USAF. The layout was clearly designed to keep the crew as far away from the engines as possible! It was possibly a contemporary of the Convair NX-2 project, proposed in response to requirement WS-125A, dated 1954. The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion programme was abandoned in 1961, so the model probably dates from the mid/late ‘50s."
blackkite said:Hi!
Nuclear powered XC-99 plan with AC-2 direct cycle nuclear reactor(two turbo machinary) and two J-77 chemical turbojet engine.
I find this aircraft as Douglas Model 26 Atomic Bomber in Tony Buttler AMERICAN SECRET PROJECTS BOMBERS, ATTACK AND ANTI-SUBMARINE AIRCRAFT 1945 TO 1974, page 94.blackkite said:Oh I remember this topic. It's better to ask Hughes or Boeing.
blackkite said:Hi! Early nuclear powered aircraft concept from "Popular Science In October,1951".
The frist picture shows indirect nuclear reactor system. Primary coolant is liquid metal and secondary coolant is water. This system is same as Liquid metal cooling fast breeder reactor(LMFBR). But generally LMFRB has intermediate cooling system to protect reactor from sodium/water reaction which occured in sodium/water heat exchanger(Steram Generator) by heat transfer tube water leak.
The second picture shows also indirect nuclear reactor system. Coolant is water. This system is same as Boiling water reactor(BWR).
Perhaps the cooling water is maintained at about 75 atm (7.6 MPa, 1000–1100 psi) so that it boils in the core at about 285 °C (550 °F) same as BWR), and became heavy weight system.
https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=OSEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA98&dq=popular+science+1951+atomic+aircraft&hl=en&ei=dgzFTP-MF8innQeCs-T4CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true
blackkite said:Oh I missed it. But it happened sometime in this forum. I think it Inevitable nevertheless to avoid.
sferrin said:That submersible nuclear ramjet is like SLAM taken to the next level.
Orionblamblam said:sferrin said:That submersible nuclear ramjet is like SLAM taken to the next level.
Yeah, that was everything awesome about the 1950's in one crazypants idea. Then came the 1960s with it's horizon-contraction... sigh...
hesham said:Hi,
http://www.enertipp.ch/index.aspx?z=1&id=191
lark said:British idea for a NPA.
Original article appeared in Flying Review early to mid fifties of the former century..
lark said:British idea for a NPA.
Original article appeared in Flying Review early to mid fifties of the former century..
RAP said:Previously posted by Hesham but caption attached.