Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider (LRS-B)

[flateric]

I am amazed at how they keep the wing span and sweep angle the same for all three!

Sweep angle is not the same. 27 degrees vs 33 for the B-2A.

Just like wingspan - it's not the same (more than 172.00)

AND NOW JUST PLEASE STOP OFFTOPIC

 

[thedewline]

Northrop Grumman B-21 Unveiling May Answer Lingering Mysteries​

Steve Trimble November 14, 2022


Slightly more than 34 years after the rollout of the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit on Nov. 22, 1988, the U.S. Air Force plans to unveil the B-21 Raider to the public on Dec. 2.

The rollout from the company’s Site 4 complex within the Air Force’s Plant 42 in Palmdale, California, will provide the first glimpse of the physical aircraft since the launch of the Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) program over a decade ago.

The aircraft revealed during the rollout may seem very familiar, however. While most program information is classified, a perhaps surprising amount of detail about the B-21 Raider’s design, performance and capabilities has entered the public domain since the Pentagon awarded the LRS-B contract to Northrop on Oct. 27, 2015.

The Air Force has released three renderings of the bomber since 2016, showing the aircraft as viewed from above and below on the right side and from a level aspect on the left side. By comparison, the service released only a single rendering of the B-2 before its 1988 rollout, revealing its flying-wing shape and distinctive, sawtooth trailing edge.

Although described as falling short of photographic accuracy, the renderings consistently show a flying-wing bomber resembling the B-2’s familiar design, with certain critical differences.

In comparison to the B-2, the released B-21 renderings appear to reveal:

• Extended, high-aspect-ratio, outboard wing sections compared with the B-2, which may offer improved lift characteristics at high altitude.
• A single W-shaped trailing edge, which appears simplified compared with the double-W, sawtooth shape of the B-2. The latter was added by Northrop late in the B-2’s design phase due to a change in Air Force requirements, which changed to include a low-altitude penetration capability.
• Inboard-canted, wingtop engine inlets. Instead of the B-2’s longitudinally flush, aft-canted inlets, the B-21 appears to deliver airflow to the engines through deeply embedded inboard-canted inlets.
• A three-pane windscreen, including a single, central pane flanked by two upward-sloping, rectangular side windows. By comparison, the B-2 uses four windscreen panels that wrap around the cockpit. Program officials explain that the B-21’s windscreen design will be easier to maintain and should offer better visibility to the pilots during inflight refueling.
• A two-wheel main landing gear. In comparison with the four-wheel bogies on the B-2, the B-21’s half-size gear, if accurately depicted, may indicate a smaller overall aircraft.

Despite these apparent revelations, the renderings leave many other critical details secret. As the Air Force allows the public to view the bomber for the first time, close observers will be on the lookout for confirmation or clues about the following items:

[end of excerpt]

Northrop Grumman B-21 Unveiling May Answer Lingering Mysteries | Aviation Week Network

The U.S. Air Force has released many details about the mostly classified program, but much about the new stealth bomber remains secret

aviationweek.com

Copying and pasting the entire article is essentially theft. Excerpting and linking is fine. Thanks for reading

 

[TomcatViP]

@thedewline : This is true but let's reflect a second on the fact that it is good, nearly pleasuring, to read, at last (!), a full take from the now secretive AvWeek

 

[Arjen]

Let us reflect for a second that some earn a living with what they write. Wanna take that away?

 

[flateric]

I'd say B-21 has four-pieces windscreen, the center frame clearly seen on last rendering
taking into account that canopy windows are load bearing structures on B-2 (that caused/causes a zillion problems) I doubt B-21 would use single-piece windshield

 

[RavenOne]

Getting a plane about half the payload of B-2, yet identical to B-52, and similar range of B-2, probably with the ability to be stored in conventional hangars, is more or less enough of an advancement. It's also coming in quantity rather than a paltry 20 bombers.

It makes perfect sense as a replacement for B-52 for the nuclear delivery role.

and when the last B-21 retires lol, then the Buff will still be soldiering on...

cheers

 

[Kat Tsun]

Except it won't?

If the B-21 doesn't reach the number of production needed, it's more likely the US simply won't have a bomber leg of the triad anymore, rather than soldier on with an old airplane, though. The reason for 100 B-21s minimum is obvious: that replaces the 76 B-52Hs and the 21 20 B-2s in the GSC's order of battle, with spares.

B-52 will be gone in 20 to 30 years and likely sooner than later, whether it wants to be or not. Even if it's still there on paper it may very well end up being hollowed out to pay for new aircraft. If the USAF has to, I suspect it will cut into B-52 operational squadrons, and kill the re-engine program (or at least heavily foot drag it, like the A-10 rewinging program), to pay for B-21 and bring their squadrons online. Shuffling funding around from A-10s or B-52s to fund JSF or B-21 is pretty trivial.

The new bomber just needs to make the hop from testing to production, which it seems to be doing rather better than B-2, which is sort of to be expected. If B-21 doesn't shake out at the end of the day, then I think the US simply won't have a bomber force in the future. It's not a terrible outcome. Both Britain and France lack strategic bombers and they do just fine as regional powers go, and America could yet go the same way in the future.

Submarines are more survivable and silos have better readiness rates, after all. With those two alone, America will still have a strategic ladder to climb to the top of its nuclear awning and shout into the escalation vortex, even if it's not a three-legged barstool to slap someone over the back with in the Thermonuclear Bar Brawl 20XX, or whatever overwrought analogy of the day is being used.

 

[Kat Tsun]

When all the senior citizens stop getting elected and actually new people show up, i.e. Senators who lack the emotional attachment to the old planes, said old planes will go away.

It happened to the Army's Hueys and Cobras it'll happen to B-52 and A-10 too.

 

[FighterJock]

When all the senior citizens stop getting elected and actually new people show up, i.e. Senators who lack the emotional attachment to the old planes, said old planes will go away.

It happened to the Army's Hueys and Cobras it'll happen to B-52 and A-10 too.

The B-52 will eventually have to be replaced in the not too distant future, what it will be replaced with that is another matter entirely.

 

[Kat Tsun]

There are literally only two options: B-21 or nothing at all.

The only question is whether B-52J(?) will be retired with or without replacement. B-21 is currently winning the argument but that could change at the drop of a hat. It would be unfortunate for Global Strike Command if they found themselves bereft of bombers in the coming decades, I guess, but not insurmountable. They would still have the ICBMs and the Navy still has the Columbias. F-35 can also deliver pretty much every meaningful article of ordnance in inventory.

 

[flateric]

T-7

 

[RavenOne]

When all the senior citizens stop getting elected and actually new people show up, i.e. Senators who lack the emotional attachment to the old planes, said old planes will go away.

It happened to the Army's Hueys and Cobras it'll happen to B-52 and A-10 too.

on a humerous note, I think there are plenty of us on here would like to see many a Senior Citizen lol

The last active us army Bell AH-1F/S retired 2000/1 timeframe with the 25th ID 25th Aviation at Wheeler AAF and the last national guard ones not so far off, after millenium. Last bit of action the Army Cobra fleet saw after Op Desert Storm was Restore Hope in Somalia and very very last was IFOR op in Bosnia.

The very last last army UH-1H was the other year....

cheers

 

[NeilChapman]

When all the senior citizens stop getting elected and actually new people show up, i.e. Senators who lack the emotional attachment to the old planes, said old planes will go away.

It happened to the Army's Hueys and Cobras it'll happen to B-52 and A-10 too.

The B-52 will eventually have to be replaced in the not too distant future, what it will be replaced with that is another matter entirely.

Refurbishing and upgrading airframes is a boon for manufacturers. You will not see a change in voting behavior by Congress whilst the 'river of life' is flowing to reelection coffers.

Boeing, in particular, will be exceptionally motivated to maintain the 'good will' of the peoples representatives. They have an egregious program record.

 

[Kat Tsun]

When all the senior citizens stop getting elected and actually new people show up, i.e. Senators who lack the emotional attachment to the old planes, said old planes will go away.

It happened to the Army's Hueys and Cobras it'll happen to B-52 and A-10 too.

The B-52 will eventually have to be replaced in the not too distant future, what it will be replaced with that is another matter entirely.

Refurbishing and upgrading airframes is a boon for manufacturers. You will not see a change in voting behavior by Congress whilst the 'river of life' is flowing to reelection coffers.

Boeing, in particular, will be exceptionally motivated to maintain the 'good will' of the peoples representatives. They have an egregious program record.

Boeing isn't in charge of the direction America's new bomber forces go. It would require B-21 to suffer some yet unforeseen problem, like suddenly losing favor in the Congress due to JSF style program bloat or the PRC evaporating, to really be competitive. Neither are particularly realistic, as Congress isn't dumb, and it sees how useful B-21 is going to be in the future. It's also on track unlike pretty much every other modern aircraft the USAF has bothered to buy.

B-21 (along with the T-7) is shaping up to be the only reasonably successful acquisition of a new aircraft for the USAF in 30 years.

 

[Hydroman]

Program wise, the B-21 is off to a very good start. Some of the folks I used to work with at N/NGC (very few now) seem to still like working for the company. I think NGC going it alone on B-21 helps not having to worry about a teammate/partner (i.e. Boeing) and concentrate on the work at hand. Scaled may not be a large player in B-21 but they contributed early on and they are a great prototype shop. I am looking forward to next Friday (12.2.22), unfortunately, I do not live in the AV any longer.

 

[X-39]

The Land Down Under the sea: AUKUS is about submarines, not bombers​

by Andrew I. Park and Steven Wills, Opinion Contributors - 11/27/22 11:00 AM ET

A recent article by Mitchell Center for Aerospace Studies expert Robert Haddick asserts that the Australian government should acquire the B-21 Raider strategic bomber, instead of the nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs) planned under the AUKUS trilateral partnership agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The argument, however, does not comport with the fundamentals of the AUKUS partnership and the platform requirements desired by Australia.

As the Australian Defense Minister Richrad Marles explained, “For a three-ocean nation, the heart of deterrence is undersea capability.” While long-range strategic bombers are an important part of nuclear deterrence and conventional strike mission, they are not a stand-alone, independent replacement for a joint force.

Most importantly, Australia is not a great power that maintains a doctrine of employing a long-range strategic bomber against an adversary. A bomber force would present more lifetime costs to the Australians than would a nuclear submarine force. Simply, acquiring the B-21 is not now in the interest of the Australian government.

The U.S. Air Force B-21 Raider is not yet in full rate production, and the cost for 100 such aircraft for the Air Force has been estimated at $203 billion by the Congressional Research Service. Australia might buy, for example, one-third of that amount (30-plus aircraft) but would still face a lifetime cost of $67 billion in U.S. dollars.

The B-21 is still a new platform and no doubt will have “teething” issues, but the Virginia and Astute-class SSNs are mature platforms in full rate production.
Australia is already buying the F-35A as a strike fighter asset and has defined its air defense envelope that acquisition will support. The B-21 does not fit that requirement. The B-21 was examined for Australian use but the nuclear submarine was still the first choice.

Comparing the B-21 and the nuclear submarine option for AUKUS is like comparing apples and oranges.

The Land Down Under the sea: AUKUS is about submarines, not bombers

A recent article by Mitchell Center for Aerospace Studies expert Robert Haddick asserts that the Australian government should acquire the B-21 Raider strategic bomber, instead of the nuclear-powere…

thehill.com

 

[VTOLicious]

#RiseoftheRaider

https://twitter.com/x/status/1596896663959846913

View: https://twitter.com/northropgrumman/status/1596896663959846913?t=G7y1oHpwN1jK5-7mDAZKFw&s=19

 

[FighterJock]

Five days to go until the B-21 is revealed? I for one cannot wait it has been a long time coming. Thanks for the Twitter link VTOLicious.

 

[totoro]

Has the exact time of the unveiling event been announced anywhere?

 

[FighterJock]

Has the exact time of the unveiling event been announced anywhere?

No news yet about the exact time totoro, I went to Northrop Grumman’s official website and there was no news about the time of the unveiling. Though I suspect that it will change as the day gets nearer.

 

[flateric]

Revealed: The Public Finally Gets to See the B-21 Stealth Bomber this Week

Some of the Northrop Grumman employees building the secret plane also worked on the B-2 bomber.

www.defenseone.com

 

[GTX]

Podcast: A Guide To The B-21 Rollout | Aviation Week Network

On Dec. 2, the U.S. Air Force and Northrop Grumman will roll out the service’s first new stealth bomber in more than three decades. Listen in as Aviation Week defense editors discuss what details they are hoping to see and what is likely to come next for the B-21 Raider.

aviationweek.com

 

[zjz]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgeX78yv6Wc

 

[aonestudio]

Northrop’s B-21 is almost here. What’s next for the stealthy bomber?

Northrop Grumman has touted the B-21 Raider bomber as "the world's first sixth-generation aircraft."

www.defensenews.com

 

[TomS]

From the Aviation Week podcast, some estimated timing info. Sounds like the rollout proper will probably happen no earlier than ~1700 PST, which means 2000 EST and 0100 GMT on Saturday. Sorry to our European colleagues.

Brian Everstine:

They're being very particular about it'll be rolled out and how we're going to look at it, even the time of day. It's going to be rolled out after dusk on the West Coast.

Steve Trimble:

I've checked the time for sunsets, 4:42 PM in Palmdale on December 2nd. So the sun goes down at 4:42 PM. I think you're supposed to arrive around three o'clock for the ceremony.

 

[Hood]

A black project black aircraft rolled out in the dark. How novel.

Don't worry about us Europeans, we'll read all about it right here over Saturday breakfast.

It's either going to be "WOW its greatest aircraft EVER" or "ugghh, just the B-2 again dude" or "it was too freakin' dark for me to measure the intake splitter plates to within 0.0000001 millimetres."

 

[FighterJock]

From the Aviation Week podcast, some estimated timing info. Sounds like the rollout proper will probably happen no earlier than ~1700 PST, which means 2000 EST and 0100 GMT on Saturday. Sorry to our European colleagues.

Brian Everstine:

They're being very particular about it'll be rolled out and how we're going to look at it, even the time of day. It's going to be rolled out after dusk on the West Coast.

Steve Trimble:

I've checked the time for sunsets, 4:42 PM in Palmdale on December 2nd. So the sun goes down at 4:42 PM. I think you're supposed to arrive around three o'clock for the ceremony.

No worries TomS, it's going to be a lot different than the B-2 unveiling that is for sure.

 

[flateric]

...

 

[flateric]

8 p.m. EST

 

[NMaude]

This unveiling will be all over the news.

 

[Slicknick]

From the Aviation Week podcast, some estimated timing info. Sounds like the rollout proper will probably happen no earlier than ~1700 PST, which means 2000 EST and 0100 GMT on Saturday. Sorry to our European colleagues.

Brian Everstine:

They're being very particular about it'll be rolled out and how we're going to look at it, even the time of day. It's going to be rolled out after dusk on the West Coast.

Steve Trimble:

I've checked the time for sunsets, 4:42 PM in Palmdale on December 2nd. So the sun goes down at 4:42 PM. I think you're supposed to arrive around three o'clock for the ceremony.

Bummer (I am in Belgium)…

Any idea why they do after sunset? (for certain details not to be exposed, I presume?)

 

[Hydroman]

Starts to get dark around 5pm PST.

 

[TomS]

From the Aviation Week podcast, some estimated timing info. Sounds like the rollout proper will probably happen no earlier than ~1700 PST, which means 2000 EST and 0100 GMT on Saturday. Sorry to our European colleagues.

Brian Everstine:

They're being very particular about it'll be rolled out and how we're going to look at it, even the time of day. It's going to be rolled out after dusk on the West Coast.

Steve Trimble:

I've checked the time for sunsets, 4:42 PM in Palmdale on December 2nd. So the sun goes down at 4:42 PM. I think you're supposed to arrive around three o'clock for the ceremony.

Bummer (I am in Belgium)…

Any idea why they do after sunset? (for certain details not to be exposed, I presume?)

Basically, it means that only features they choose to illuminate will be visible.

 

[aonestudio]

10 Facts About Northrop Grumman’s B-21 Raider

Northrop Grumman’s B-21 Raider will be unveiled Dec. 2 at the company’s site in Palmdale, Calif., marking the first time the world’s first sixth-generation aircraft will be seen by the public. When delivered to the Air Force...

news.northropgrumman.com

 

[flateric]

Northrop Grumman Offers New B-21 Raider Details Ahead of Rollout | Air & Space Forces Magazine

Days before the first B-21 Raider is set to emerge from Northrop Grumman’s Palmdale, Calif., factory, the company revealed new details.

www.airandspaceforces.com

 

[RavenOne]

From the Aviation Week podcast, some estimated timing info. Sounds like the rollout proper will probably happen no earlier than ~1700 PST, which means 2000 EST and 0100 GMT on Saturday. Sorry to our European colleagues.

Brian Everstine:

They're being very particular about it'll be rolled out and how we're going to look at it, even the time of day. It's going to be rolled out after dusk on the West Coast.

Steve Trimble:

I've checked the time for sunsets, 4:42 PM in Palmdale on December 2nd. So the sun goes down at 4:42 PM. I think you're supposed to arrive around three o'clock for the ceremony.

No worries TomS, it's going to be a lot different than the B-2 unveiling that is for sure.

prob be held inside hangar with cover thrown off???

cheers

 

[TomS]

prob be held inside hangar with cover thrown off???

cheers

If it was going to be indoors, they wouldn't care about twilight, I'd think.

Judging from the AW&ST podcast, there are going to be a bunch of aircraft there highlighting Northrop Grumman and Doolittle Raider history, not just the B-21.

Which will give a lot of reference objects to compare the B-21 against.

 

[FighterJock]

prob be held inside hangar with cover thrown off???

cheers

If it was going to be indoors, they wouldn't care about twilight, I'd think.

Judging from the AW&ST podcast, there are going to be a bunch of aircraft there highlighting Northrop Grumman and Doolittle Raider history, not just the B-21.

Which will give a lot of reference objects to compare the B-21 against.

It will be interesting to see what the historic Northrop Grumman aircraft will be.

 

[Hydroman]

Since the B-21 probably shares configuration elements with the unmanned, so-called RQ-180 (or whatever the real designation is) this may be the reason for the twilight roll-out. Disclosure of the unmanned platform could be down the road, maybe?

 

[Flyaway]

Since the B-21 probably shares configuration elements with the unmanned, so-called RQ-180 (or whatever the real designation is) this may be the reason for the twilight roll-out. Disclosure of the unmanned platform could be down the road, maybe?

There will probably be an RQ-180 taxing past in the background just to see if anyone spots it in the gloom.