Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor

sferrin said:
Thought the whole point of keeping the tooling was so they could. (I realize standing up a line all over again would be a task but not "physically impossible". )
Click to expand...

So, about a decade ago, it was $10 billion and five years just to get to the point that you could start making them again. And that seems to kinda handwave the fact that they haven't made an F-119 engine from scratch in 20-some years.

www.twz.com

Here’s The F-22 Production Restart Study The USAF Has Kept Secret For Over A Year

We finally see the study that was oddly classified on arrival and it has new relevance based on Japan's desire for a new stealth fighter.
www.twz.com www.twz.com

So maybe it's not physically impossible to ever make more F-22s, but it's not possible to do it as a quick stopgap while we consider NGAD options. An F-22 restart would kill any chance of NGAD for a decade at least.
 
sferrin said:
Thought the whole point of keeping the tooling was so they could. (I realize standing up a line all over again would be a task but not "physically impossible". )
Click to expand...
Basically the tooling and materials set aside years ago for such an eventuality were (highly illegally) used to shore up the F-35 program instead. They would literally have to build new tooling from scratch and that would just be the start.
 
Grey Havoc said:
Basically the tooling and materials set aside years ago for such an eventuality were (highly illegally) used to shore up the F-35 program instead. They would literally have to build new tooling from scratch and that would just be the start.
Click to expand...
How could they use F-22 manufacturing tooling for the F-35? I very much doubt it's close enough where it could be easily repurposed. If this is true, it seems impossible that the US government could not have known about it. Isn't it the government's task to store all of that stuff and not the task of Lockheed Martin?

Maybe this would be better moved to the F-22 thread.
 
Colonial-Marine said:
I very much doubt it's close enough where it could be easily repurposed.
Click to expand...
Apparently a lot of kludging was involved. As to how they were able to access the tooling and materials so easily, guess who got the contract to 'safely' store it away in the first place?
 
Grey Havoc said:
Basically the tooling and materials set aside years ago for such an eventuality were (highly illegally) used to shore up the F-35 program instead. They would literally have to build new tooling from scratch and that would just be the start.
Click to expand...
O RLY? Once more
www.twz.com

Here’s The F-22 Production Restart Study The USAF Has Kept Secret For Over A Year

We finally see the study that was oddly classified on arrival and it has new relevance based on Japan's desire for a new stealth fighter.
www.twz.com www.twz.com
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240807_205446_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240807_205446_Chrome.jpg
    341.2 KB · Views: 206
flateric said:
O RLY? Once more
Click to expand...

My understanding is that around 2016 the Air Force conducted an audit of the F-22 tooling, etc. that was stored at Sierra Army Depot and found everything they expected to be there was there.

If someone is truly interested in this they could contact the Sierra Army Depot public affairs and ask about the audit and wether the F-22 tooling is still stored there. They could also submit a FOIA request to the Air Force for a copy of the audit and specify that a summary of it is all they need and the full details are non responsive, which would (theoretically) reduce the amount of information the Air Force would need to review.

It is still possible that the tooling "burned" in a "flood" like the records of a certain Air Force agency (I have actually been told this before) since the 2016 audit.

Congress did allocate funds for the preservation of the F-22 tooling. The Air Force has ignored the wishes of Congress before, like when they took SR-71 reactivation funding, used it for other things, then claimed the SR-71 was too expensive and could not fly anyway (because they took away the funds allocated by Congress).
 
flateric said:
By whom? And can you explain how Raptor tooling can be used to shore up JSF production?
Click to expand...
I do believe I used the term 'kludging'. And last I heard, Congress (including agencies such as the GAO) have not been able to independently verify the 95% of F-22 production tooling that was supposed to be still extant.
 
Last edited:
Grey Havoc said:
I do believe I used the term 'kludging'. And last I heard, Congress (including agencies such as the GAO) have not been able to independently verify the 95% of F-22 production tooling that was supposed to be still extant.
Click to expand...

Air Force F-22 Fighter Program
www.everycrsreport.com

Air Force F-22 Fighter Program

Procurement of Air Force F-22 Raptor fighters began in FY1999, and a total of 195 (177 production aircraft, 16 test aircraft, and 2...
www.everycrsreport.com www.everycrsreport.com

F-22 Aircraft: Air Force Needs to Better Document Options Before Making Critical Decisions
www.gao.gov

F-22 Aircraft: Air Force Needs to Better Document Options Before Making Critical Decisions

The Air Force proposed to divest—i.e., retire—its F-22 Block 20 aircraft without fully documenting the implications. Block 20s are used for training...
www.gao.gov www.gao.gov

There is dispute over the costs of restarting production of the F-22 itself at various points. A different issue is that various parts, components, etc. are no longer in production and are not easily replaced (like the radar and engine). That is a different, critical issue.
 
Are there suitable engines that could be fitted to the 'Raptor'? I have seen comments that NGAD is NDEAD over a little while now.
 
Would a more powerful variant of the F-135 engine work for the F-22 especially with supercruise Foo Fighter?
 
FighterJock said:
Would a more powerful variant of the F-135 engine work for the F-22 especially with supercruise Foo Fighter?
Click to expand...
No, I think the dimensions are just too different. Yes some tech could flow back if it hasn't already but no simple swap or upgrade.
 
The F135 is larger in diameter, length, and weight than the F119, and would never fit in the F-22 engine bay.

The core module of the F135 is a development of the F119 core with some more advanced technology incorporated. There was a study done on what it would take to install the F135 core into the F119 to take advantage of the technology advancements and bring some commonality to the Depot overhaul process. It was decided at the time that this change was not worth the cost of implementation.

With the F135 Engine Core Upgrade in development, it seems like the ECU could also be incorporated into the F119 with similar changes that were identified in the previous study. Whether it would be cost effective or bring enough performance increase within the remaining F-22 life span is doubtful.
 
F119Doctor said:
The F135 is larger in diameter, length, and weight than the F119, and would never fit in the F-22 engine bay.

The core module of the F135 is a development of the F119 core with some more advanced technology incorporated. There was a study done on what it would take to install the F135 core into the F119 to take advantage of the technology advancements and bring some commonality to the Depot overhaul process. It was decided at the time that this change was not worth the cost of implementation.

With the F135 Engine Core Upgrade in development, it seems like the ECU could also be incorporated into the F119 with similar changes that were identified in the previous study. Whether it would be cost effective or bring enough performance increase within the remaining F-22 life span is doubtful.
Click to expand...
Were there ever plans to upgrade the F-22 engines? Seems odd if there weren’t any as all the teen series fighters had engine upgrades.
 
That drawing is not accurate, the F119 is smaller than the F135 but not by that much, and per publicly available USAF technical orders, the F119 is 196 inches (4,978 mm) in length with the rectangular nozzle flaps fully open, so the scaling is quite a bit off.

There were some F119 upgrade proposals in the 2000s when the F-22 program wasn't truncated, including some variations with round axisymmetric nozzles for the FB-22, but those didn't come into fruition. Most F119 upgrades have been smaller grade, consisting of durability improvements.

EDIT: This image is also a useful reference.
 

Attachments

  • pratt-whitney-f119-2.png
    pratt-whitney-f119-2.png
    6.6 MB · Views: 191
Last edited:
There has been a continuing F119 Component Improvement Program to improve the durability of individual parts to meet the specification engine and part life. There has been no physical engine changes to improve thrust performance.

A couple of years ago, P&W determined that the hot section of the engine was not being used as hard as the engine specification and there was usable life remaining at the depot inspection interval. A software change has been developed to incorporate at throttle push in certain parts of the envelope to increase thrust by running the engine hotter. I believe it is in test at Edwards AFB, but has not yet been fielded.
 
what_is_that said:
www.airandspaceforces.com

New F-22 Sensors Could Help Extend the Raptor’s Service Life

Secret new sensors being tested on the F-22 may extend its service life beyond 2030, Air Force officials indicated.
www.airandspaceforces.com www.airandspaceforces.com
Click to expand...
www.airhistory.net

Aircraft Photo of 91-4007 / AF91-007 | Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor | USA - Air Force | AirHistory.net #648242

Aircraft photo of 91-4007 / AF91-007 / ED - Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor - USA - Air Force (411 FLTS), taken by Dan Stijovich at Edwards - AFB (KEDW / EDW) in California, United States on 25 January 2024 during the Falcon Rejoin 50 2024. The 'Bond' plane taxis back to the Raptor enclave
www.airhistory.net www.airhistory.net

91-4007 from January this year.
 

Attachments

  • 0658841.jpg
    0658841.jpg
    473.8 KB · Views: 157
www.flightglobal.com

RTX fined $200m for release of classified military aircraft data to Russia and China

US defence giant RTX, the parent company of Raytheon, Collins Aerospace and Pratt & Whitney, agreed to a $200 million settlement with US government for the unauthorised release of sensitive data on nearly two dozen military aircraft to foreign adversaries.
www.flightglobal.com www.flightglobal.com

"In a separate incident from 2021, an RTX employee used a company-issued laptop containing sensitive technical data while on a personal trip to Russia. Internal cybersecurity measures flagged the issue, but the location alert was ignored as a false positive.

The laptop contained technical data on the Lockheed Martin F-22 and F-35 stealth fighters, as well as the U-2. That employee had travelled to Russia on four prior occasions, bringing the laptop on at least one those earlier trips, according to the state department.

Another incident in 2019 saw an employee travel to Iran while carrying a company laptop containing technical data on the Northrop Grumman B-2 stealth bomber and F-22 fighter. In that case, cybersecurity protocols remotely froze access to the laptop’s hard drive."
 
icyplanetnhc (Steve) said:
www.airhistory.net

Aircraft Photo of 91-4007 / AF91-007 | Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor | USA - Air Force | AirHistory.net #648242

Aircraft photo of 91-4007 / AF91-007 / ED - Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor - USA - Air Force (411 FLTS), taken by Dan Stijovich at Edwards - AFB (KEDW / EDW) in California, United States on 25 January 2024 during the Falcon Rejoin 50 2024. The 'Bond' plane taxis back to the Raptor enclave
www.airhistory.net www.airhistory.net

91-4007 from January this year.
Click to expand...
is it possible to make a new paint ? instead of this old used looking ?
 
Are you suggesting 'a fresh coat of paint', or an entirely different application of RAM in line with F-35 practices?

Genuine question - would the latter be feasible on the F-22?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom