hesham said:Hi,
from Les Ailes journal,the designer Pierre Bazoin created two aircraft projects,the
first was tourist aircraft with inverse "M" shape,and the second was a six-engined
huge transatlantic flying boat in a weird configuration.
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6560495x/f7.image
hesham said:Hi,
here is two aircraft in very weird configurations.
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k65552283/f5.image
hesham said:here is the Gaucher Week-End,a two seat high wing light aircraft;
c460 said:Drawing of the Richard-Penhoët 2, from the Spanish magazine Aérea, April 1924.
avion ancien said:More on the Duverne-Saran bimoteur from, I think, an issue of l'Aéro dating from the 1930s.
hesham said:... I don't know the right,Rexovice or Rexonice ?.
A bit late answering this. According to 'French Aircraft of World War One' by Davilla & Soltan, at least 155 aircraft were built.Avimimus said:Anyone know how many Salmson Moineau S.M.1 were completed? Sources vary between a couple of prototypes and all 155 ordered. Some sources even have them in operational use as night bombers in 1918!
At least one machine, belonging to AR 289, was still in use in 1918. This S.M.1 flew reconnaissance in support of the 66e Division des Chasseurs a Pied until late 1918.
hesham said:and no more info about Botali on Internet.
hesham said:Hi,
here is a little known French aircraft projects,the Antares by Jean Angeli and
the Delma by Delambre et Maingon;
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6576024m/f5.image
Maveric said:A french designer, but built in Marokko...
cluttonfred said:Thanks, hesham. One comment...it would be useful to include the year of publication for some of these to give an idea of the context. Cheers, Matthew
Jemiba said:Maveric said:A french designer, but built in Marokko...
Good clue ! That could mean, that it principally was a Spanish design, as Morocco was
divided into a Spanish and a French protectorate then. It seems more probable to me,
that Emile Hennion was working in the French part, nevertheless it's not certain, of course.