Terribly sorry. Perhaps I made a big mistake.
I think that this drawing is not reliable.
Engine interval is too large compared with actual Il-54 front view picture.
Engine interval/engine nacelle outer diameter=7.5, I think this value is 6.17.
Fuselage cross section is not circular nevertheless pressurized cabin.
 

Attachments

  • il-54.gif
    il-54.gif
    28.8 KB · Views: 197
  • il54-3.jpg
    il54-3.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 195
I believe that this is a correct Il-54 three side view drawing.
Cockpit is small compared with actual Il-54 side view picture. Because this drawing shows No.2 prototype.
Wing sweep back angle is around 58°. Little large?
Horizontal and vertical tail stabilizer shape are good compared with actual side view picture.
(Please check page 153 of "OKB ILYUSHIN" if you have. You can see very rare IL-54 No.2 prototype picture with different cockpit shape compared with No.1 prototype and no outboard wing fence.)
I want to see Il-54 No.1 prototype three side view drawing.
 

Attachments

  • il54-1.gif
    il54-1.gif
    322.5 KB · Views: 221
  • il54-2.jpg
    il54-2.jpg
    47.3 KB · Views: 210
Perhaps this side view shows IL-54 No.1 prototype.
I imagine that IL-54 No.1 prototype wing sweep back angle is 55°. No.2 prototype wing sweep back angle is 58° and no outboard wing fence.
Perhaps ventral fin was added after flight test.
 

Attachments

  • IL-54.jpg
    IL-54.jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 188
  • il54_2.gif
    il54_2.gif
    13.9 KB · Views: 174
Hi! My latest poor speculation for IL-54 design evolution.
 

Attachments

  • IL-54_design_evolution_speculation.jpg
    IL-54_design_evolution_speculation.jpg
    117.1 KB · Views: 275
Hi! I believe that these drawings nearly shows IL-54 No.1 prototype(wing tip wheel retractable direction is old, and overall length is little short?) and No.2 prototype or unbuilt final plan.(Almost same scale)
Perhaps No.2 prototype or unbuilt final plan wing span is smaller than No.1 prototype wing span.


I believe that there is a rare IL-54 second prototype flying picture in Jane's all the world's aircraft in 1956-1957 or 1958-1959.
Someone has this volume? Perhaps copyright is over.


ОкОнчательный вариант : final option
 

Attachments

  • IL-54_prototype.jpg
    IL-54_prototype.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 252
  • s-l225.jpg
    s-l225.jpg
    7.9 KB · Views: 1,416
  • DSC_0021.jpg
    DSC_0021.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 263
Hi! Il-74.


 

Attachments

  • full-webil-7423-100-1470642922.jpg
    full-webil-7423-100-1470642922.jpg
    375.1 KB · Views: 270
  • IL-74 model.jpg
    IL-74 model.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 281
  • okb-il-19.jpg
    okb-il-19.jpg
    107.8 KB · Views: 288
Hi! IL-18.





"Wingspan, M 41.10, Length of aircraft, M 29.86, Height of the plane, M 9.40, Area of wing, M2 140.0
Mass, kg : Empty aircraft 28490, Normal Flight 42500, Maximum Flight 47500
Type of engine 4 of the Al-73tk, Power, HP 4 x 2400
Maximum speed, km/h 565, Cruising speed, km/h 450
Practical range, km 4000, Practical Ceiling, M 9000
Crew, Person 5-6
Payload: Up to 66 passengers or 28 beds or 90 paratroopers and up to 7600 kg of cargo
Number of production : 1, First flight-17 August 1946"
 

Attachments

  • il-18p3d.jpg
    il-18p3d.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 262
  • Il-18 model.jpg
    Il-18 model.jpg
    84 KB · Views: 226
  • il-18pcolor.jpg
    il-18pcolor.jpg
    67.5 KB · Views: 218
  • IL-18 cabin.jpg
    IL-18 cabin.jpg
    111.5 KB · Views: 202
  • 0_e473a_9e86b3e6_XXL.jpg
    0_e473a_9e86b3e6_XXL.jpg
    475.2 KB · Views: 231
ucon said:
Hi, guys!
One of the very early Il-12 double-tailed project with ACh-31 engines. Note the shape of the fuselage nose part - it was used than in Il-18 (1947)

in my files;

the early Il-12 Project had a four engines,does any one hear or got a drawing to this
design ?.
 
Also in my files,

there was a Project version of Il-28,had a swept wing shape.
 
hesham said:
Also in my files,

there was a Project version of Il-28,had a swept wing shape.

That was the Il-30 which was completed but never flown owing to concerns over the structural strength of the wings.
 
Hood said:
hesham said:
Also in my files,

there was a Project version of Il-28,had a swept wing shape.

That was the Il-30 which was completed but never flown owing to concerns over the structural strength of the wings.

No my dear Hood,

it a Project version called Il-28S.
 
For this thread,

we can't divide it into pieces,because it has many subjects,most of them only one post
or two.

In my files,

there was two version of Il-98,and not one,maybe had different shapes.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 658

Attachments

  • Il-96-550.jpg
    Il-96-550.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 264
  • Il-196  artist.jpg
    Il-196 artist.jpg
    351.2 KB · Views: 271
  • Il-196.jpg
    Il-196.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 449
  • Il-86.jpg
    Il-86.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 455
  • Il-76.jpg
    Il-76.jpg
    438.1 KB · Views: 464
Il-12 with ACh-31 engines
 

Attachments

  • IL-12-prototype.jpg
    IL-12-prototype.jpg
    135.9 KB · Views: 288
Hi,

 

Attachments

  • c1925bd5aece239aded2e69f037a2d96.png
    c1925bd5aece239aded2e69f037a2d96.png
    294.8 KB · Views: 233
  • 59059d3db442935cdd15f47f7b2e7148.png
    59059d3db442935cdd15f47f7b2e7148.png
    38.5 KB · Views: 236
  • af31dd87c6e735b56b4f935a449770d1.png
    af31dd87c6e735b56b4f935a449770d1.png
    294.8 KB · Views: 245
  • e638d30af96d80c837f7d8e023af1ebf.png
    e638d30af96d80c837f7d8e023af1ebf.png
    75.6 KB · Views: 255
So I have two Il-38 drawings. Landing gear shape is different.
Explanation of top drawing is as follows. http://alternathistory.com/proekty-frontovykh-bombardirovshchikov-il-38-i-il-42-sssr
"At the insistence of SV Ilyushin, IL-38 was carried out in triple. Defensive weapons were the same as Il-28: two HP-23 guns protected the front hemisphere, and the Il-K6 feeder with two HP-23 covered the rear hemisphere. The main support of the chassis was four - under each of the nacelles there were two supports. They had one wheel each and retracted one forward, the other back. At the same time, the wheels were rotated 90 ° and laid flat into the lower part of the nacelle.
The bomber project received a positive evaluation from the customer, who, however, deemed it necessary to improve the aircraft's take-off data by installing more powerful engines."


I think that the second drawing is incorrect.

- Tony Buttler & Yefim Gordon, Soviet Secret Projects Bombers Since 1945 (Midland Publishing, 2004), pp. #30-31

The Il-30 had a sequel shape of a project designated Il-38, which was a twin engined bomber powered by two TR-3 engines. It retained the Il-30's basic shape and carried the same bomb load but different from its predecessor in having smaller dimensions, a lower weight and a revised defensive armament borrowed from the Il-28 (comprising two forward-firing NR-23 cannon supplemented by the Il-K6 tail turret with two NR-23 cannon). There were three crew and the bicycle undercarriage gave way to a tricycle arrangement which differed from the Il-28, being more along the lines of that used on the Il-46 except that the twin wheels on each main leg were moved further apart to either side of the nacelle; this arrangement resulted in the characteristic low sit of the aircraft on the ground.
The project drew favorable comment from the Air Force but the military wished to see an improved airfield performance through the use of more powerful engines.
 
From Аэрокосмическое обозрение 2005 06,

the IL-114 recce and air surveillance drawings.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    216.8 KB · Views: 276
  • 2.png
    2.png
    192.6 KB · Views: 306
Hi Bestuzhev,

it's from 2014 and not 2011,please see my PM.
 
The Russian language magazine AviaSoyuz number 81 (АвиаСоюз №3-4 июнь-август 2020) has an extensive 8 page article by Nikolai Talikov about various post-war Ilyushin passenger and transport projects.

There are descriptions, with some images (some shown earlier in this thread), of the following types:

Il-64
Il-66
Il-70 SST
Il-72
Il-74
Il-82
Il-88
Il-90
Il-96-550
Il-78
Il-100
Il-108
Il-126
Il-196

Not too keen to show the images because the publication is still current.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom