Could be only recently they're feeling the extent of the problem. Individual squads can't be packing their own SAM systems and the drone situation in Ukraine is down to the personal level. I don't think people saw that coming so soon.Net guns were one of the first counter-drone technologies proposed, going back to at least 2016. Are the Russians really only just catching up now?
Would have to agree with that.Could be only recently they're feeling the extent of the problem. Individual squads can't be packing their own SAM systems and the drone situation in Ukraine is down to the personal level. I don't think people saw that coming so soon.
While the usual answer to any headline that comes in the form of a question is "NO", this is probably the exception that proves the rule.![]()
Does The U.S. Need To Be Building Hardened Aircraft Shelters For Its Combat Aircraft?
The US military and Congress are increasingly butting heads over aircraft shelters even as threats, especially from drones, grow.www.twz.com
Rimfire ammunition isn't reliable enough. At least not if you're using the round being fired to power the weapon. It'd be acceptable for a chain gun type weapon.If you are using a full sized aircraft to hunt drones, I wonder if it might make sense to use auto-aimed turreted weapons. Something like the AM-180 wouldn't weigh much but would spit out a high rate of fire of .22LR rounds... terrible against most targets bu just spiffy against drones. And it would be cheap.
Honestly, fitting it with a P90 5.7x28mm and 50rd magazines would probably be best.
The 5.7 and 22lr are such small bullet weights I have a hard time seeing them being effective at more than 10M being fired from a moving full sized aircraft. Wind and such is going to play havoc on those small bullets trajectories.Rimfire ammunition isn't reliable enough. At least not if you're using the round being fired to power the weapon. It'd be acceptable for a chain gun type weapon.
Honestly, fitting it with a P90 5.7x28mm and 50rd magazines would probably be best.
I think a Ka-29 was defending against naval drones near Crimea when Russian air defence made another unfortunate mistake.Yeah,its a weird one isnt it?
With all of the potential anti usv weapons they`ve got but they`re using [I`m assuming] a guy with a machine gun.
Heres a Ka-29 with rockets and atgms
![]()
One influential Russian source claims the Helix was taken out by friendly fire, during a search for Ukrainian uncrewed surface vessels (USVs). Another said it came during a massive aerial and USV attack that killed nearly 30 Russian troops in occupied Crimea and Krasnodar.
“In Anapa, our own air defense shot down our own helicopter,” the Thirteenth Telegram channel, run by Russian soldier and milblogger Egor Guzenko, wrote.
During its sweep for Ukrainian drone boats in the Black Sea, “one of our [Pantsir air defense systems] hit the helicopter,” the Thirteenth wrote, adding that four Russian troops were killed in the incident.
Preliminary information indicated it was “due to a malfunction of the ‘friend or foe’ system,” he suggested. “I will not voice any versions, let counterintelligence and the investigation sort it out. Eternal memory to our soldiers.”
Why am I not surprised?I think a Ka-29 was defending against naval drones near Crimea when Russian air defence made another unfortunate mistake.
![]()
Russian Navy Ka-29 Assault Helicopter Downed Amid Massive Ukrainian Drone Attack
The helicopter was shot down as Ukraine sent scores of drones to strike Crimea and Russia's Krasnodar region on targets ranging from oil facilities to an airfield.www.twz.com
I'm not expecting more than ~25m range out of the 5.7 version if moving relatively slowly.The 5.7 and 22lr are such small bullet weights I have a hard time seeing them being effective at more than 10M being fired from a moving full sized aircraft. Wind and such is going to play havoc on those small bullets trajectories.
If you made a dedicated small anti drone drone fitted with a P90 or similar sure I can see a use case then.
They're using USVs and UAVs simulataneously, and the UAVs flys at a similar speed to the helicopters, so when they get sent out to intercept the USVs, they risk being shot down.Why am I not surprised?
You would`ve thought by now that they`d have had their sh!t together.
These C-sUAS systems will combine Rheinmetall's command and control system, Skymaster, and high-power guns with Lattice and open, modular and scalable hardware components including Anduril’s Sentry Tower, Wisp sensors and Anvil, its autonomous interceptor. By combining the unique capabilities of both companies, an unmatched layered solution for C-sUAS will be offered. Overall, the MoU aims to bring together the complementary skills of these two leading companies.
They're using USVs and UAVs simulataneously, and the UAVs flys at a similar speed to the helicopters, so when they get sent out to intercept the USVs, they risk being shot down.
Other interesting counter-drone stuff:
![]()
What Is This Mystery Row Of Spheres In A Ukrainian Field?
Help us solve the mystery of this curious array that could be a military system or something else entirely, like an agricultural apparatus.www.twz.com
![]()
Air Force mobility fleet seeks on-board defenses against small drones - Breaking Defense
Air Mobility Command documents say they're interested counter-drone systems, including platforms that can operate near friendly aircraft, so as not to hypothetically accidentally jam or spoof a nearby vice president's plane.breakingdefense.com
It's why I think we're going to see dedicated "fighter quadcopters" or similar. In WW1, the plane started out as an artillery observer and intel platform, then the artillery observers started shooting at each other, then they started making dedicated fighters.It seems expensive conventional SAMs might not be the right approach to dealing with drones. As drones become much smaller and *vastly* more numerous, attempting to take the out with missiles will become increasingly idiotic.
If so, only briefly. Soon enough there will be *swarms* of slaughterbots. You could easily deploy 10,000 of them from a van or an aircraft, each just smart enough to attack a single human. You won't defeat those with thrilling aerial dogfights by defensive slaughterbots, unless defensive drones are deployed in superior numbers. it might become necessary for each solider on a battlefield, and then every civilian *near* a conflict, to carry a backpack loaded with def-drones that launch on a split second notice and hover about you at a range of a few yards.It's why I think we're going to see dedicated "fighter quadcopters" or similar.
Range will be the reason why defensive swarms can work.If so, only briefly. Soon enough there will be *swarms* of slaughterbots. You could easily deploy 10,000 of them from a van or an aircraft, each just smart enough to attack a single human. You won't defeat those with thrilling aerial dogfights by defensive slaughterbots, unless defensive drones are deployed in superior numbers. it might become necessary for each solider on a battlefield....