Pegasus 2024: Aviators left Alaska to join Japan
Direction: Air / Published on: July 22, 2024
On July 19, the Aviators of the Pacific Skies component of the Pegasus mission left the United States, after 2 weeks of intense "Arctic Defender" exercise, to Japan as part of a valued stopover.
Pegasus 2024: Aviators left Alaska to join Japan
After several hours of flight, the crews crossed the route of the date change line. Thus, by taking off on Thursday, July 18 at 9:00 a.m., the Rafale, A330 MRTT and A400M landed on Friday, July 19 at 9:00 a.m. also. It was also a first time for the Rafale.
Upon arriving in Japanese airspace, the A330 MRTT and the two Rafale were joined by a patrol of three F-2s from the Japan Air Self-Defence Force (JASDF), two EA-18s and a P-8 from the US Navy, in order to participate in a joint training.
Pegasus 2024: Aviators left Alaska to join Japan
The Aviators were warmly welcomed by their Japanese comrades, Japanese and French flags in hand, symbolizing the friendship that binds the two countries. Sharing, discovery and visits of their respective aircraft, patch exchanges, static exhibitions, conference with the local press organized by the French Embassy in Japan, so many moments of exchange leaving in the memory of our Aviators, some unforgettable memories.
Pegasus 2024: Aviators left Alaska to join Japan
After these 24 hours of valued stopover, the Pacific Skies detachment is heading to Australia for a trilateral arrival in Darwin for Exercise Pitch Black 24. The French detachment already present on site is preparing to welcome them with open arms.Was
Un accident impliquant deux avions Rafale de l'armée de l'Air et de l'Espace s'est produit mercredi en milieu de journée en Meurthe-et-Moselle et des "opérations de recherche" de deux pilotes ont été engagées, selon la préfecture et l'état-major. Deux avions de chasse de l'escadron de transformation Rafale (ETR) de la base aérienne de Saint-Dizier (Haute-Marne) sont entrés en collision l'un avec l'autre, a indiqué à l'AFP un porte-parole de l'armée de l'Air et de l'Espace à Paris.
"Des enquêtes de sécurité et judiciaires sont ouvertes pour faire la lumière sur les raisons de cet accident", a déclaré l'Armée de l'air sur le réseau X (ex-Twitter). Selon cette dernière, les deux avions revenaient d'une mission de ravitaillement en Allemagne.
------------------------*//*------------------------------
An accident involving two Rafale aircraft from the Air and Space Force occurred Wednesday at midday in Meurthe-et-Moselle and "search operations" for two pilots have been launched, according to the prefecture and the general staff. Two fighter jets from the Rafale transformation squadron (ETR) at the Saint-Dizier air base (Haute-Marne) collided with each other, a spokesperson for the Air and Space Force in Paris told AFP.
"Security and legal investigations are being opened to shed light on the reasons for this accident," the Air Force said on the X network (formerly Twitter). According to the latter, the two planes were returning from a refueling mission in Germany.
Still nothing yet.Any word yet on the two pilots of the twin seater that were missing?
Sad news about the missing pilots being confirmed dead. RIP.
Actually, these are the sixth and seventh losses; there was a crash in 2010 near Pakistan and one in 2012 in the Mediterranean, both M variants. Overall, it's still much safer than the Mirage. Crashes make headlines but all modern combat aircraft have much better safety records than their predecessors.Fourth and fifth Rafale losses.
Indian Air Force participates in RF-A 24-2
Indian Air Force maintainers prepare Rafale aircraft for takeoff during Red Flag-Alaska 24-2 at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, June 6, 2024. Integrating forces strengthens joint planning,www.eielson.af.mil
Media of Indian Air Force Rafales participating in Red Flag-Alaska 24-2.
Actually, these are the sixth and seventh losses; there was a crash in 2010 near Pakistan and one in 2012 in the Mediterranean, both M variants. Overall, it's still much safer than the Mirage. Crashes make headlines but all modern combat aircraft have much better safety records than their predecessors.
This is a really sad case, actually. Would've loved to see a single engined Rafale.
What is up with you, mate? I'm not saying that it is a straight up single engined version of the Rafale; I'm just likening this configuration to what a possible single engine version of Rafale could look like. And there's nothing wrong with that since Dassault actually provided technical support to SOKO.It is at least another 30 years to find a common ancestor of them all.
Translation: Despite the previous existance as a Lavi clone the Yugoslav jet is not a single engine Rafale. Only ended up that way.
Oh, just noticed a comment. Will gladly help the aviation history in due course.
Yeah, when something appears on twitter it appears on a whole bunch of other fake news sites that nobody has ever heard of.Due to Durov's arrest, the UAE froze the contract for the purchase of fighter jets from France - mass media: EADaily
"The United Arab Emirates is considering the possibility of a complete blockade of military-technical cooperation with France after being detained in Paris of Telegram founder Pavel Durov," the portal's telegram channel says. August 27th, 2024. EADailyeadaily.com
guess there is more to that
The Russian news agency EurAsia Daily, abbreviated EADaily, was founded in 2015. It states that its main activity is to give an objective overview of politics and social processes in Eurasia. The editorial office is based in Moscow, with correspondents and observers in several of Russia’s neighboring countries: Armenia, Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, as well as in Russia’s dependent regions such as Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria.
In the right circumstances, any aircraft aircraft can shot down any other one.
Both Rafale and Su-35 are 4.5 gen, both use similar technologies (AESA, long range Fox3, some treatments for reduced RCS, comprehensive EW suite...
Su-35 doesn't have anything special (stealth for example) to place it above the Rafale (or Typhoon, Gripen E/F)...
Chinese J-11 were said to be superior to the Gripen in WVR combat, but similar or only slightly superior to the J-10 which routinely kill each other in WVR training. Rafale and Su-35 have more thrust than any of those jets so I don’t see why they couldn’t kill each other. The lack of an HMD is probably a bigger handicap for the Rafale.Not in dogfight,but in avionics ?.
There have been articles about electronic warfare tests between Rafale and Su-35 in Egypt, where the Rafale won, but, as far as I know, it was fake news. Apparently these tests never took place. The sources were a Breaking Defense article and a tweet, both from Mahmoud Gamal, but I never found either. They both disappeared.Not in dogfight,but in avionics ?.