shin_getter
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 1 June 2019
- Messages
- 968
- Reaction score
- 1,236
Is Cruisers today more relevant than, say, Cruisers in WWII? If it were, and war breaks out, I don't think the marginal performance difference would be highlighted at all.
www.forbes.com
The replacement for the Burke is a ... Long Burke?
Small programs with fast iteration is low risk compared to leap-ahead with large planned runs.
-----
edit: perhaps the Navy could steal AF digital engineering and plan an series of ships instead of one and done ddX design.
![www.forbes.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimageio.forbes.com%2Fspecials-images%2Fimageserve%2F60a67d37fc552bc0ea723c48%2F0x0.jpg%3Fformat%3Djpg%26crop%3D1466%2C825%2Cx0%2Cy379%2Csafe%26height%3D900%26width%3D1600%26fit%3Dbounds&hash=1e78f3b01a1a9d65e4a9403ce253f66a&return_error=1)
Seven Reasons The U.S. Navy Needs To Rethink Its Plan For A Next-Generation Destroyer
The Navy's DDG(X) destroyer isn't ready for primetime.
![www.forbes.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.forbesimg.com%2F48X48-F.png&hash=9622ebb6fc240d125fb73af3342314b9&return_error=1)
The replacement for the Burke is a ... Long Burke?
Small programs with fast iteration is low risk compared to leap-ahead with large planned runs.
-----
edit: perhaps the Navy could steal AF digital engineering and plan an series of ships instead of one and done ddX design.