US Army - Lockheed Martin Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF)

Long Range Precision Fires seems to me to be a move to move the center of mass away from armor/mech and to artillery to simply pulverize the OpFor where ever it lives in increasingly cost effective ways as the range bands decrease. If I guided RAP arty shell can reach 70 km and cost as much as the shell plus a <$10,000 guidance unit/fuse, then engaging a single 6x6 supply truck with an artillery round suddenly becomes a perfectly cost effective way of doing business. GMLRS pushes that out to 100km+ and $100,000+ for the long range version, but that's still worth a radar or command post at least. PrSM pushes range and price to 500km/$1million, and SM-6 pushes that further out for ~4 million. LRHW is probably 30-40 million, but at that point you're hitting target a couple thousand miles away.

The main feature all of the above need is sufficient ISR to provide targetting data, AI to sort through the wide area target data and identify targets and prioritize them, and further AI to take a list of targets, a list of potential fire sources, and match them up in a range/cost effective manner to produce good effects. I'm specifically very interested in the Project Convergence exercises for this reason. Last year they utilized commercial satellites as well as military ones and apparently the observe to shoot cycle was in minutes or seconds. Obviously that's in a benign test environment, but if a robust, survivable ISR/AI system could be produced to provide fire missions to the Army's LRPS units in an organized way, artillery might decide most engagements.

Picture an armored brigade resting for the night engaged by a battalion of ERCA howitzers upgraded with auto loaders, using GPS ammo and provided with exact vehicle targets as their fire missions (one vehicles = one shell fire mission from one gun). You could fire a round at every armored vehicle in the unit in a minute and then scoot and see what survived.
 
The US Army made the goofy decision to eliminate LRPs in favor of UAS some yrs ago.
 
shin_getter said:
Anyone know anything about this:
View attachment 664838View attachment 664839
View attachment 664840

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BizxGiCJ-pg


https://twitter.com/x/status/1440041004283744258
View: https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1440041004283744258
Click to expand...

Gun-launched

Mark Wade Encyclopedia Astronautica most complete resource for rockets spacecraft launch vehicles astronauts cosmonauts spaceflight engines space history exploration
www.friends-partners.org

These creatures could do airbase defense and more.


1634164710157.png


The 5 inch gun-launch system was initially designed to satisfy the requirements of the Meteorological Rocket Network This required that an 0.9 kg (2 lb) payload be carried to an altitude of 65 km (40 miles). Typical payloads were radar reflective chaff ejected at apogee, which was tracked by radar to yield wind data, and small Metsondes which drifted to earth under large parachutes and returned radio telemetry of temperature, humidity and the like. The 7 inch HARP gun system represented the 5 inch system scaled up to the largest barrel size practical, while still remaining portable.
1634164727869.png
The 7 inch gun launcher was created by smooth boring a 175 mm gun and extending it in a similar manner as the 5 inch gun system. The completed gun barrel was 16.8 m (55 feet) long (7 inch L 92.4) and was installed in a modified T-76 mount. Two of the new guns were constructed. The 7 inch guns had 3 times the payload capacity of the 5 inch guns and an altitude capability in excess of 100 km. The 7 inch guns filled the altitude gap between the maximum 5 inch gun altitude and the minimal attractive altitude for 16 inch gun probes.
 
TomS said:
Forest Green said:
bobbymike said:

New Artillery Round Promises Higher Speed, Extended Range

New Artillery Round Promises Higher Speed, Extended Range
www.nationaldefensemagazine.org www.nationaldefensemagazine.org
Click to expand...
A conventional munition flies at 25 miles per hour????
Click to expand...
Usain bolt is fast, but I'm sure a howitzer round travels faster.:(
Click to expand...

Looks like they fixed it; now refers to normal shells having a range of 25 miles, versus up to 44 for the ramjet.
Click to expand...
Which is pretty sad when you consider only months ago they were talking about much high ranges up to and including 1000+ miles with the super howitzer. Hell a G6 beats it and doesn't even need the ramjet:

defense-update.com

155mm Artillery System Claims World Record: 76km - Defense Update:

In a recent firing series held in South Africa, the German-South African joint-venture Rheinmetall Denel Munitions (RDM) demonstrated a dramatic increase in the range of its artillery firepower. The demonstration employed three 155 mm cannons with 52 and 39 caliber lengths, which scored three...
defense-update.com defense-update.com
 
This is a round with a terminal seeker and that is compatible with not just the ERCA but also existing L39 tubes.
 
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (OTS) says it has successfully tested four XM1210 (XM1113ER) high explosive rocket-assisted projectiles for the US Army’s future Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA) system.

According to the company, the projectiles demonstrated a range capability in excess of 70 kilometers during the October 2 test at the Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.


defbrief.com

US Army tests XM1113 projectile for its ERCA extended range cannon

General Dynamics has tested four XM1210 (XM1113ER) high explosive rocket-assisted projectiles for the US Army’s ERCA system.
defbrief.com defbrief.com
 
www.yahoo.com

US Army’s Precision Strike Missile breaks distance record in flight test

The Army conducted a flight test to push its new Precision Strike Missile out as far as it could beyond 499 kilometers on Oct. 13 at Vandenberg Space Force Base, California.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

The company did not disclose the distance the PrSM traveled in its flight test, but the goal of the test was to see exactly how far the missile can travel beyond its previous set requirement of 499 kilometers.
Click to expand...
 
It's a 500 km class missile that they previously estimated could get to about 550 km once the EMD versions are delivered. So that's its max range capability until it receives a propulsion upgrade possibly later in the decade.
 
sferrin said:
TomS said:
Forest Green said:
bobbymike said:

New Artillery Round Promises Higher Speed, Extended Range

New Artillery Round Promises Higher Speed, Extended Range
www.nationaldefensemagazine.org www.nationaldefensemagazine.org
Click to expand...
A conventional munition flies at 25 miles per hour????
Click to expand...
Usain bolt is fast, but I'm sure a howitzer round travels faster.:(
Click to expand...

Looks like they fixed it; now refers to normal shells having a range of 25 miles, versus up to 44 for the ramjet.
Click to expand...
Which is pretty sad when you consider only months ago they were talking about much high ranges up to and including 1000+ miles with the super howitzer. Hell a G6 beats it and doesn't even need the ramjet:

defense-update.com

155mm Artillery System Claims World Record: 76km - Defense Update:

In a recent firing series held in South Africa, the German-South African joint-venture Rheinmetall Denel Munitions (RDM) demonstrated a dramatic increase in the range of its artillery firepower. The demonstration employed three 155 mm cannons with 52 and 39 caliber lengths, which scored three...
defense-update.com defense-update.com
Click to expand...
SLRC is a much larger weapon in the 200mm plus range. It isn't relevant to the M109.

As for the Rheinmetall demo, of course they beat what the M109 could do with a ramjet, the G6 ER is a L52 gun with a non-NATO standard 25 liter chamber. You can get a RAP very far with that setup. The M1299's gun can easily hit that range with a RAP, even with a drag-inducing PGK on the front of it. A ramjet round fired from this gun on the other hand is expected to go past a hundred kilometers.
 
www.defensenews.com

What's needed for integrated fires?

Army leaders explain what capabilities will be necessary for the Defense Department's goal of integrated fires.
www.defensenews.com www.defensenews.com

"hyperactive and high volumn threat"
they know w/o SLRC w. RPM they will be overmatched overrun etc.
 
I wish them luck, but I think the SLRC was probably a bridge too far.

I wonder if the longer barrel of the ERCA would impart a significant range advantage or if the round would just top out at terminal velocity and only go incrementally further?
 
SLRC is funded but its an S&T effort and not a program or even an operationally fieldable prototype program like the other efforts. There are three teams working on a ramjet round for the 155 mm guns including ERCA. All are funded to demo around the same time.
 
I think the 155mm will definitely happen; its an achievable goal. SLRC I think had range and cost requirements that are just beyond the tech right now. I was curious though whether increasing the charge behind a ramjet round appreciably ups the range; I kinda would have thought once the ramjet is up to speed most of the the extra energy is just bled off in drag during flight. Basically, would the ERCA really add more range compared to plane jane M109A7 if the round is mostly an airbreather? But even if not, still an amazing capability if they can field it. The US and its allies have no shortage of 155mm tubes.
 
bring_it_on said:
SLRC is funded but its an S&T effort and not a program or even an operationally fieldable prototype program like the other efforts. There are three teams working on a ramjet round for the 155 mm guns including ERCA. All are funded to demo around the same time.
Click to expand...
there are surely many multiple issues and even options to resolve to get SLRC right, and unfortunately likely not enough time, however msles are still one shot wonders in more respects than one.

PS: a return of the 203mm or 175mm ramjets w/ ranges beyond any 155mm would likely be worth a look.
 
Yes they can look at a few of those but right now, under the "strategic fires" the Army is prioritizing just one rapid prototyping and operational program in the LRHW. That will transition to a PoR around 2023. Beyond that, I'm not sure there is room in the budget to field the other beyond maturing tech and having a more longer term view on fielding the long SLRC. Operational and tactical fires are getting more funding as there are huge gaps there due to INF so that will keep the Army busy for a while assuming there's even room there to fully buy those programs (with the upcoming budget wars)..
 
bring_it_on said:
Yes they can look at a few of those but right now, under the "strategic fires" the Army is prioritizing just one rapid prototyping and operational program in the LRHW. That will transition to a PoR around 2023. Beyond that, I'm not sure there is room in the budget to field the other beyond maturing tech and having a more longer term view on fielding the long SLRC. Operational and tactical fires are getting more funding as there are huge gaps there due to INF so that will keep the Army busy for a while assuming there's even room there to fully buy those programs (with the upcoming budget wars)..
Click to expand...
Thanks for the update. Didnt want be a fan of PrSm but its a semi-savior. Maybe.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom