A reputable source!
The very name often sounds, to my ears, like an insult to the 1957 satellite and Korolev memory (sigh)
A reputable source!
Have you ever heard of Sukhoi T-4MS?About Pak-Da i know this render image : it's too early for know definitive project. Could be remained it @ state of project or other.
Russia greenlights production of PAK-DA stealth bomber
Russia greenlights production of PAK-DA stealth bomber
The PAK-DA is expected to replace all current strategic bombers in the Russian Air Force by the next decade.ukdefencejournal.org.uk
Sorry that I cannot hide my reservations, but how likely is this schedule?
"Flight tests of the aircraft is scheduled for 2027" and in the same report "to commence production for a possible delivery by 2027" are vastly different issues and given the issues they already had and still have with the Su-57; I'm not holding my breath.
Russia greenlights production of PAK-DA stealth bomber
Russia greenlights production of PAK-DA stealth bomber
The PAK-DA is expected to replace all current strategic bombers in the Russian Air Force by the next decade.ukdefencejournal.org.uk
Sorry that I cannot hide my reservations, but how likely is this schedule?
"Flight tests of the aircraft is scheduled for 2027" and in the same report "to commence production for a possible delivery by 2027" are vastly different issues and given the issues they already had and still have with the Su-57; I'm not holding my breath.
Bullshit as usual. And as usual much more probable misinterpretation of one words plus talking heads giving other empty words. Kinda same as with T-14 (which was never supposed to be delivered in 2300 number) or T-50 (which never had any reasonable issues during development, just same talking heads giving "introduction date" at three years after first flight (???) and then shifting it again, again and again).Sorry that I cannot hide my reservations, but how likely is this schedule?
"Flight tests of the aircraft is scheduled for 2027" and in the same report "to commence production for a possible delivery by 2027" are vastly different issues and given the issues they already had and still have with the Su-57; I'm not holding my breath.
It seems there will be somewhat of a race to roll out a new strategic bomber among three major powers.
Based mostly on timing, if NG rolls out its bomber first, then Chinese and Russians can use the later rollout as a propaganda tool, claiming it as a direct answer to B-21 in my opinion.
It seems there will be somewhat of a race to roll out a new strategic bomber among three major powers.
It will be interesting to see what country comes out with their strategic bomber first.
Maybe the Raider or the Chinese bomber will appear first but I doubt of the B-21 is a generation ahead because other countries like Russia have a healthy know how of Stealth America is not anymore the leader of stealth and military electronics! Russia and China made a huge progress at these scientific fields in the past years. Don't get me wrong the B-21 Raider wil be a awesome new stealth bomber, that surpass the B-2 that's for sure! But don't underestimate your rival/oponent.I'm betting on Northrop. Let me see, B-2 Bomber roll out, November 22, 1988. Northrop wins!
I haven't any doubt the B-21 is going to be at least a generation ahead of what either China or Russia rolls out.
I'm betting on Northrop. Let me see, B-2 Bomber roll out, November 22, 1988. Northrop wins!
How would you determine "generation ahead"?I haven't any doubt the B-21 is going to be at least a generation ahead of what either China or Russia rolls out.
It will be interesting to see what country comes out with their strategic bomber first.
Based mostly on timing, if NG rolls out its bomber first, then Chinese and Russians can use the later rollout as a propaganda tool, claiming it as a direct answer to B-21 in my opinion.
It will be interesting to see what country comes out with their strategic bomber first.
Even more interesting will be the fact that will indicate which country was the first to bring its aircraft to real combat readiness and mass production.
Based mostly on timing, if NG rolls out its bomber first, then Chinese and Russians can use the later rollout as a propaganda tool, claiming it as a direct answer to B-21 in my opinion.
So PAK-DA is the direct answer to the B-21.
They started working on PAK-DA before there even was such a thing as a B-21. They'll be lucky if they get even B-2 quality.
They started working on PAK-DA before there even was such a thing as a B-21. They'll be lucky if they get even B-2 quality.
Work on the B-21 was not the only work in the United States on a strategic bomber in the last 30 years.
B-2 remained in that era, still "Soviet".
As for quality, first you need to know the real quality of the B-2 itself.
No, it does not cancel.And? That doesn't change the fact that work on PAK-DA started years before there was such a thing as the B-21.
The Soviet era died within a year or two of the first flight of the B-2.
It's not a complete unknown. Also, the problems with the Su-57 aren't exactly a ringing endorsement of Russian ability in the department of building stealth aircraft. Certainly not to the degree the US does.
I would say PAK-DA is a rather very late answer to the B-2, same with the Chinese H-20 which has been in the works since early 2000s. To what degree Russian and Chinese bombers are equivalent or better in comparision to the B-2 is only a guess, but I think its fairly obvious they should at least be on par, if not surpass, B-2 capabilities. On the other hand I highly doubt PAK-DA or H-20 will reach the same generational leap as the B-21.Based mostly on timing, if NG rolls out its bomber first, then Chinese and Russians can use the later rollout as a propaganda tool, claiming it as a direct answer to B-21 in my opinion.
So PAK-DA is the direct answer to the B-21.
There are no options.
Another thing is that in tactical terms they can be different.
loldThe "problems" of the Su-57 mainly exist on the pages of some ideologically charged Western publications.
yes, sure. Tabloid name was RuAF C-in-C ZelinThe fact that the Su-57 could not be ready in 2015 was already clear, despite the arguments in some Russian tabloids.
Well, I would not say that:lold
yes, sure. Tabloid name was RuAF C-in-C Zelin
I would say PAK-DA is a rather very late answer to the B-2,