People get annoyed when airshow F-22s are accused of having poor maintenance of the coatings, but they don't seem to be able to tell the difference between a rough prototype where RCS does not matter at all either and a serial unit...
During the presentation, the General Director of the UAC, Yu. B. Slyusar, said:
To increase the specific thrust as is claimed for the izd.30, the nozzle pressure ratio has to go up. Since the nozzle is structurally a pressure vessel with moving parts, design surprises can happen even with a previously proven design
Structurally a rectangular nozzle is not as efficient as a round nozzle, since all of the flat surfaces try to bend in the middle under the air pressure loads.
If I remember well, he said that in the context of being questioned about the engine that LTS would employ, he referred to the engine not being izd 30 but the nozzle being already transitional. At least that is the way I understood that, using the translator I admit I can be dead wrong.... but it made sense to me.
hello buddyHi guys, this is what I think it could look like.. RVV-SD and RVV-MD in side bays, and a pair of Kh-59MK2 in the main weapons bay:
, I have a question, could you share your su 75 model ?? it's very nice and I would like to add it to the game ARMA 3 (only for my use), please write back
www.niielectron.ru
www.niielectron.ru
www.niielectron.ru
I wonder if those weapon bay doors can be used as high lift devices for STOL.
Quoting costs from US method of CPFH modelling doesn't do justice to aircraft in operation with other airforces.
Exactly, so comparing CPFH of a fleet in USAF to any other countries fleet cost is highly dubious.
Especially since everyone's looking for a buyer. It's like the mpg figures used to advertise cars.
What new radar do you mean and what for? To make it more expensive while it's supposed to be as cheap as possible? Derivative of N036 will be more than enough.
LTCC modules seem cheap and efficiently better, The Su-57 besides new engines is getting new avionics. I didnt think the Su-57 would get a internal hypersonic missile or that the LTS would possibly use 2nd stage engines but here we are. I rather prefer new radars and rather if that happens or not one can only dream.
LTCC modules seem cheap and efficiently better, The Su-57 besides new engines is getting new avionics. I didnt think the Su-57 would get a internal hypersonic missile or that the LTS would possibly use 2nd stage engines but here we are. I rather prefer new radars and rather if that happens or not one can only dream.
LTCC modules seem nonexistent, ATM. The main goal of LTS is to be affordable in development, production and service. So no risky solutions, waste of time and extra-costs.LTCC modules seem cheap and efficiently better, The Su-57 besides new engines is getting new avionics. I didnt think the Su-57 would get a internal hypersonic missile or that the LTS would possibly use 2nd stage engines but here we are. I rather prefer new radars and rather if that happens or not one can only dream.
Same reason why F-35 will be transitioned to Block IV, time does not stop...
KRET and RTI stated they are 10 years behind the west in MMIC technology and that radar goes all the way back to 2009. Upgrade is needed for the mid 2020s which I am hoping more information is disclosed on the LTS as it is for the Su-70. Never a boring day with sukhoi.LTCC modules seem cheap and efficiently better, The Su-57 besides new engines is getting new avionics. I didnt think the Su-57 would get a internal hypersonic missile or that the LTS would possibly use 2nd stage engines but here we are. I rather prefer new radars and rather if that happens or not one can only dream.
Anyone know what the problem is with the current Su-57 avionics? And why it is getting new avionics, are the current systems not good enough.
i am impressed! i love it! incredible design. however the issue with me is the "gun option for ground targets" not sure what to put there TBH. but anyway if the F-35 and F22 were combined and developed by Sukhoi.... this is what you would get. and im impressed. not going to lie i do agree with (forgot the name) saying "this is the sexiest aircraft ever developed by Sukhoi". and props to the guy who snapped us the photos of the aircraft arriving to the building covered up. he was prob laying down in the grass behind a chain-link-barbed-wire fence. and the man who leaked the photos in the building..... give the man a bloody medal! and good luck in the gulag but anyway this aircraft should be exclusively for certain countries that are not in a global conflict that could threaten the safety of world powers. i am in fact surprised and kind of not that the RuAF didnt purchase them. they prefer the Su-57 type aircraft. dual engined and long range stealth for the emense airspace of their country. but anyway i give Sukhoi a gold star for effort and ingenuity on this fifth generation aircraft.
