Not to nitpick, but the patent is about low observable air intake ;)
Right, but prior art is the DSI bump on a flat surface.

I'm not sure "a DSI bump on a curved surface" is sufficiently novel to be patentable. Because it is a VERY obvious next step from the flat surface DSI.
 
Right, but prior art is the DSI bump on a flat surface.

I'm not sure "a DSI bump on a curved surface" is sufficiently novel to be patentable. Because it is a VERY obvious next step from the flat surface DSI.
Also, now that I think about it, IIRC the F-16 DSI was on a slightly curved surface as well...
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom