Even better if they said they'd be happy to use New Glenn - whenever it's able to fly.I'd love to see the look on Jeff Bezos's face if the pension fund manages to force him to use the Falcon 9.
Even better if they said they'd be happy to use New Glenn - whenever it's able to fly.I'd love to see the look on Jeff Bezos's face if the pension fund manages to force him to use the Falcon 9.
Only days ago, a lengthy public suit against Amazon regarding its Project Kuiper decision was filed. Project Kuiper, similar to Starlink, is trying to increase global broadband access through a constellation of over 3,000 satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO). Back in early 2022, Amazon signed and announced significant launch contracts with Blue Origin’s New Glenn, ULA’s Vulcan, and Arianespace’s Ariane 6.
In the suit, however, shareholders claim that Amazon “acted in bad faith” and made no effort to properly discharge their fiduciary duties when picking the launch providers. They primarily claim that SpaceX, the leader within the industry was glossed over and not even considered when making the decision. If that were the case, they would have a valid point considering the cost per launch and timeline these satellites are meant to launch by.
The suit puts a lot of focus on Blue Origin and the relationship between Musk and Bezos. They strongly suggest that SpaceX was excluded from consideration from the Project Kuiper competition because of the rivalry between the two. Here I will go more in-depth into this new lawsuit, what it means for the future launches, its significance, and more.
Full article here - https://thespacebucket.com/shareholde...
that is wrong. How many new launch vehicles have there been lately? Also, it isn't Texas that regulates the launches.SpaceX can work like that at a remote location in a state like Texas. The rest of the industry however can't get away with that way of working.
They’d have had to replace him 10 years ago anyway.Still mad they didn't cast Dennis Farina as JJJ.
They’d have had to replace him 10 years ago anyway.
That's the one that did it for me.falsely accused one of the British cave-divers on the rescue team of being a paedophile.
They are united, next fuelling and wet launch rehearse.
![]()
While Starship is expected to be one of the most affordable launch options in the future, its current development is far from cheap. Between thousands of employees, frequent testing, materials, massive infrastructure projects, etc., Starbase requires a constant stream of funding. This begs the question of how can SpaceX afford this and what does the company’s finances look like.
Not long ago reports came out showcasing SpaceX’s revenue and expenses over the last few years. This gives us a much better idea of the cost of Starship and how the company can keep innovating in Texas. It even revealed that for the first time in a few years, the company managed to turn a profit. This is all extremely relevant to SpaceX’s goal and the future of some of these different programs.
At the end of the day, companies can only burn so much money on certain projects before they need to see a return. On the other hand, SpaceX has been developing Starship at a fast pace and plans to have an operational launch vehicle in the not-too-distant future. Here I will go more in-depth into the costs of developing Starship, the greater finances of the company, SpaceX finally making money, and more.
Full article here - https://thespacebucket.com/a-closer-l...
Anybody said anything about that bump yet? I don't know that it's significant but I'll bet more than one heart momentarily fluttered.
The wobble doesn't bother me...even the Saturn shook with guys with ropes tugging at it.
I would be surprised if most, if not all, of those corrective actions have been completed. Launch pad, specifically the deluge system, is completely new and tested as well as the Flight Termination System.Mishap investigation is now closed, signaling the FAA is happy with the data and analysis. But they again make clear that SpaceX must make the specified corrective actions which affect public safety and obtain a launch license modification covering FAA's requirements before they can launch the next prototype.
View: https://twitter.com/SpaceflightNow/status/1700150082392182871
SpaceX has been making corrective changes as the process has been going, and will likely apply for the modification as soon as practical.
No, you don't give up after one or two failures and start from scratch. That's what the US does in hypersonics as we can see how awesomely effective that is.I hope so. The GAO is harping on SLS again...but Starship/SuperHeavy is such a complex beast that it is slowing Musk.
If the next few flights are failures... maybe meet in the middle.
A SpaceX type SLS that is the same width flies a stage-and-a-half to orbit profile and dumps a lot of Starlinks off directly---no upper stage...or maybe with just one VacRaptor.
The SLS like core has four standard Raptors...easy plumbing...and you throw less of them away than in losing whole SS/SH cores that will be de facto expendable. This can be built faster and be a less busy design.
More mass needed?
Just stretch the tank...add more Falcon Heavy style strap-ons....making it look like the Vulkan concept of Glushko.
Call it "Elonergia."
A whole line of pads for Falcon strap-ons at Boca.
Just make the core a bit stronger for side mount boosters, to make Dagger happy.
SS/SH full reusability can wait a bit...a four Raptor SLS-like SuperHeavy would be a faster build...get Raptors flying sooner.
With the amount of changes and upgrades to the new Starship prototype, compared to the one that launched back in April, some consider it practically a new rocket. SpaceX and Elon have pointed out that there are over 1000 changes across the entirety of the new test article both physical and mission-related. All of which are intended to help facilitate a successful launch, stage separation, and complete flight.
On the first test flight, there were quite a few things that went wrong from liftoff to the activation of the flight termination system. Thankfully, SpaceX also gained a lot of invaluable data which has been directly applied to the current prototype. From engine changes to booster heat shield upgrades, a new stage separation, and leak prevention, SpaceX has been very busy.
Recently the company released a detailed report highlighting what exactly went wrong on the first launch and how they addressed these problems with the current Starship test article. Here I will go more in-depth into some of the most significant changes, why SpaceX thinks this launch will be different than the first, the expected launch date, and more.
Full article here - https://thespacebucket.com/the-upgrad...
No, that was internet art by someone clueless.Elon floated a five core Falcon super heavy once, as I recall...
SpaceX and SLS don't mix; too different of culture. Also, rockets are not Legos; can't just throw different rocket parts together. Also, it is show a lack of knowledge basic rocket science.I hope so. The GAO is harping on SLS again...but Starship/SuperHeavy is such a complex beast that it is slowing Musk.
If the next few flights are failures... maybe meet in the middle.
A SpaceX type SLS that is the same width flies a stage-and-a-half to orbit profile and dumps a lot of Starlinks off directly---no upper stage...or maybe with just one VacRaptor.
The SLS like core has four standard Raptors...easy plumbing...and you throw less of them away than in losing whole SS/SH cores that will be de facto expendable. This can be built faster and be a less busy design.
More mass needed?
Just stretch the tank...add more Falcon Heavy style strap-ons....making it look like the Vulkan concept of Glushko.
Call it "Elonergia."
A whole line of pads for Falcon strap-ons at Boca.
Just make the core a bit stronger for side mount boosters, to make Dagger happy.
SS/SH full reusability can wait a bit...a four Raptor SLS-like SuperHeavy would be a faster build...get Raptors flying sooner.
I hope so. The GAO is harping on SLS again...but Starship/SuperHeavy is such a complex beast that it is slowing Musk.
If the next few flights are failures... maybe meet in the middle.
A SpaceX type SLS that is the same width flies a stage-and-a-half to orbit profile and dumps a lot of Starlinks off directly---no upper stage...or maybe with just one VacRaptor.
The SLS like core has four standard Raptors...easy plumbing...and you throw less of them away than in losing whole SS/SH cores that will be de facto expendable. This can be built faster and be a less busy design.
More mass needed?
Just stretch the tank...add more Falcon Heavy style strap-ons....making it look like the Vulkan concept of Glushko.
Call it "Elonergia."
A whole line of pads for Falcon strap-ons at Boca.
Just make the core a bit stronger for side mount boosters, to make Dagger happy.
SS/SH full reusability can wait a bit...a four Raptor SLS-like SuperHeavy would be a faster build...get Raptors flying sooner.
I think when they run out of pre made engines, that's that.
Fair enough, was unaware. But I guess they would have to for the program to be able to proceed.They already have RS-25Es in production to replace the RS-25Ds when those run out.
NASA is hardly the only government launching service caught flat footed; it just is perhaps the best funded with the most ambitious goals. It seems unlikely SLS lasts very long.
TESLA is a shareholder company, you face issue like hostile takeover.I hear from Next Big Future that Gates is trying to 'short sell' TESLA.
Er, you do understand the concept of sarcasm, right?Meanwhile the NASAspaceflight fanatical fanboying thread has reached brand new levels of criminal stupidity.
Special kudos to this - https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=58887.msg2522756#msg2522756
And this - but it is "business as usual". Unfortunately. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=58887.msg2522723#msg2522723
Some people are so disconnected from reality - if their beloved Elon told them to eat cyanide poison on their way to Mars - they would do it. Blindly.
Ship 25 being destacked this morning.
@NASASpaceflight
Er, you do understand the concept of sarcasm, right?
Only a few days ago we learned that SpaceX had completed all the necessary FAA corrective actions for the approval of Starship’s second launch. This was very promising news and suggested the company would revive a launch license within just weeks or days. However, new information from the FAA confirms the launch will likely take place no earlier than October and a few more approvals are still needed.
This comes in addition to new meetings between Elon Musk and the FAA, and physical progress on the Starship test article. Just earlier today SpaceX began to destack Ship 25 from Booster 9 for a possible installation of the Flight Termination System. This is one of the final pre-launch steps and only happens when the launch is right around the corner.
This being said, the company won’t be launching anything until the second test flight is approved by the FAA, when they are satisfied with everything SpaceX has done since the last flight. Here I will go more in-depth into the new comments from the FAA, other necessary approvals, physical progress, and more.
Full article here - https://thespacebucket.com/more-detai...
No, that was internet art by someone clueless.