aonestudio
I really should change my personal text
- Joined
- 11 March 2018
- Messages
- 2,653
- Reaction score
- 6,270
Always figured that to be the case when people were harping on about shells per day and 9,000 vs 20,000. You can fire 100,000 unguided shells per day and miss with every single one, FPVs, not so much.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ0Gea7bOUk
Always figured that to be the case when people were harping on about shells per day and 9,000 vs 20,000. You can fire 100,000 unguided shells per day and miss with every single one, FPVs, not so much.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.I suspect on the Ukrainian side at least the lack of shells has produced this effect. Artillery is still vastly more effective against troops in the open.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.
...UAVs as a core part of a modern Western land force.
the Autors must drink poison for this.
Core part of modern warfare is an reconnaissance and strike contour, which has only a part of the UAV.
Without artillery, aviation, tanks and comunication troops your core part is shit
P.S. Admin, you'd better get back from repression to the subject area.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.
You don't need an assault section against a foxhole. There is enough videos of drone bombing against foxholes and trenches to show that it is not really defensible in the long term."Highly dispersed" is relative. A five to seven man assault section against a two man foxhole is a very serious attack these days.
So how do you attack such positions?
One really has to wonder just what the cost of one of these bespoke military spec quadcopters will be compared to an off the shelf mavic....Teledyne unveils Rogue 1 exploding drone sought by Marine Corps
Should the Rogue 1 drone not explode or be recalled, it can be disarmed and reused thanks to a mechanical disconnect.www.defensenews.com
View attachment 728184
View: https://x.com/TotherChris/status/1787849770033172484
As always it depends on how many you make.One really has to wonder just what the cost of one of these bespoke military spec quadcopters will be compared to an off the shelf mavic....
5x,10x,20x?
I suspect this will probably only be purchased in very small numbers [if at all].
But it does raise the question of how western militaries are going to equip themselves with something like a mavic when buying off the shelf chinese drones is likely a total non starter both for political and technological/security reasons.
Hi!Tanks? The Russians and Ukrainians seem to prefer "tank". Singular.
Like it or not but the proliferation of FOG-type munitions with integrated killer-ISR capabilities means armored vehicles are less survivable in numbers and more survivable in singletons. At least it might make presently anemic Western tank fleets more impactful since acquisition of relevant tank defense systems should be easier in small batches.
Hi!
My English is terrible, so the online translator gives preference to the tank. Sorry for this.
And my comment concerned the authors' erroneous conclusion that UAVs are the core part of modern warfare. It's not like that!
They are only a part of it, and most importantly, not decisive. Which does not negate what you said. Indeed, the development of technology has allowed the UAV to declare itself as a serious weapon. Whereas previously the military treated them with prejudice.
If we highlight interesting solutions in the Ukrainian conflict from both sides, then I would start with the Lancet and the Orlan (30,10) from the Russian Federation and unmanned naval drones from Ukraine. Let's see where this path leads us =)
Confirmed 3rd example of a russian operated mohajer 6,how many more are there I wonder?
These are clearly being used to hunt for targets but I dont recall ever seeing any footage from these in russian military vids,mind you I dont recall much if any video footage from the orion either.
...but not finding downed presidents.
For what its worth neither did the sar and ir equipped turkish akinci drone,tho it did find a campfire lit by one of the search parties which was initially wrongly claimed as the wreck site.Qods Mohajer-6 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
...but not finding downed presidents.