Forest Green
ACCESS: Above Top Secret
- Joined
- 11 June 2019
- Messages
- 7,901
- Reaction score
- 13,350
It tells a fair deal about Bild that they have marked the island of Novaja Zemlja which houses nothing that Ukraine would be interested in striking but have not marked the Cross of Yamal (a meeting point of nearly all of the gas pipelines running from the Western Siberian fields to Europe located in Surgut which, BTW, happens to be in the region inhabited by the last remaining Eastern Khanty and Forest Nenets people) or Uralvagonzavod's factory in Nižnyj Tagil.German publication BILD infographic on the current range of Ukrainian drones. View attachment 724691
The UJ-25 is a weaponized version of the Ukrjet UJ-23 Topaz target drone. Both aircraft have missile-like main bodies, forward-swept wings, V-tail configurations, and top-mounted air intakes at the rear of the fuselage feeding into a turbojet engine; the UJ-25 differs outwardly only by having forward canards. Although the Skyline's specifications are not known, the Topaz has a cruise speed of 600 km/h (370 mph), a top speed of 800 km/h (500 mph), endurance of 90 minutes, and a mission radius of 400 km (250 mi) with a payload weight of 10 kg (22 lb) and is guided either by manual control link or by following a preprogrammed route. As a one-way kamikaze drone, the UJ-25 could have a strike range of around 800 km (500 mi), long enough to reach Moscow. Its jet propulsion makes it harder to counter than piston engine Shahed-136 drones used by Russia, as its faster speed combined with relatively small size and low-observable characteristics reduces the reaction time for air defenses to attempt to intercept it.[1]
Some of these larger drones based on light aircraft would be perfect for munition dispensing runs over airfields.Rusi report on drones.
...UAVs as a core part of a modern Western land force.Rusi report on drones.
he mosaic is a compact, triple-frequency receiver that utilizes signals from all available GNSS constellations, ensuring optimal positioning availability in difficult conditions. It features built-in anti-jamming and anti-spoofing technologies to safeguard against both intentional and accidental interference.
I was thinking WW1 observation ballons.Everything old is new again.
Shades of the ww2 Fugo balloon bomb
I`ve always wondered how one of these might perform with a more modern guidance system.
Interestingly a hunter stumbled across the remains of one of these back in 2019,tho at first glance he thought it was the remains of an old still.
Sometimes the quality of the optics adds to that effect.WW1 is right....
I was looking at a vid from some part of the ukraine,and I remember thinking that if I hadnt know any better I might`ve thought I was watching a digitally restored colorised film of the western front circa 1916,really the only thing that gave it away was a brief shot of a knocked out ifv.
It was because of the massive numbers of craters from the artillery pock-marking the entire landscape.
France's EOS Technologie has unveiled Veloce 330, a remotely operated munition capable of flying at 400 km/h.
In May 2022, the French Defence Procurement Agency [DGA], via the Defence Innovation Agency [AID], launched two projects for remotely operated munitions [MTOs], namely Colibri and Larinae, which should respectively be capable of neutralising an armoured vehicle located 5 and 50 km away.
Always figured that to be the case when people were harping on about shells per day and 9,000 vs 20,000. You can fire 100,000 unguided shells per day and miss with every single one, FPVs, not so much.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ0Gea7bOUk
Always figured that to be the case when people were harping on about shells per day and 9,000 vs 20,000. You can fire 100,000 unguided shells per day and miss with every single one, FPVs, not so much.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.I suspect on the Ukrainian side at least the lack of shells has produced this effect. Artillery is still vastly more effective against troops in the open.
There is no reason to concentrate infantry when infantry firepower is not important. It appears to me that troops are forward mostly to dig and occupy defensive fortification and a highly dispersed approach is fine.