siegecrossbow
I really should change my personal text
- Joined
- 12 March 2012
- Messages
- 686
- Reaction score
- 1,989
I clearly see its weapons bay open
View attachment 763263
Luckily we got some better ones this morning.



I clearly see its weapons bay open
View attachment 763263
Second flight. Apologies for the image quality.
The most Beautiful plane since the SR-71AI enhanced upscale.
View attachment 763286
Not sure what you mean? We've had clearer photos than these already, all 3 exhausts are equal? The white stuff is it's camo scheme.I have to say, profile view is stunning with a little YF-12 look.
I can also see* that, if a third engine it has, the axial exhaust nozzle is probably not aligned like in most attempt of representations seen until now.
Also, is the white stuff on the picture censorship?
Also not sure what @TomcatViP means...Not sure what you mean? We've had clearer photos than these already, all 3 exhausts are equal? The white stuff is it's camo scheme.
AB with extended wingtip flaps just looks sus...Unfortunately I‘m just on my way to a conference and cannot check if legit or again psed, but I just found this on @琴石2022‘s Weibo site:
View attachment 763312
If it turn out to be a real image. I do wonder if it is needed for control during take off, and not just in typical flap function.AB with extended wingtip flaps just looks sus...
So it match with the analyse of the USAF who speak about a air dominance aircraft.If legit Deino it would be the first photo to clearly show the J-36 using afterburners.
sureSo it match with the analyse of the USAF who speak about a air dominance aircraft.
The last iteration of USAF going to a air dominance J-36 I think they have more informations than us for having this conclusion.sure
The last iteration of USAF going to a air dominance J-36 I think they have more informations than us for having this conclusion.
It show a supersonic capability too ...Subsonic plane don't use afterburnerYeah but having afterburner is not the real indication. All it shows is the design is using same engine as their fighters so a WS-10 variants or even already in WS-15.
I suspect that if this was 50 years ago, they'd call it an interceptor.So it match with the analyse of the USAF who speak about a air dominance aircraft.
If this photo is real, then it does give some added weight to the "three engines for simplicity in terms of power" side of debates, as opposed to range.Unfortunately I‘m just on my way to a conference and cannot check if legit or again psed, but I just found this on @琴石2022‘s Weibo site:
View attachment 763312
AI enhanced upscale.
View attachment 763286
I never said it was good, just biggerThe result has so many artifacts and errors! Honestly, the rawer the image the better for analysis... an AI upscaled image just makes analysis less likely to be accurately assessed (better to just enlarge without upscaling).
The after burner kinda look flickery? So I still have some doubt.
Let's wait and see if Deino can get any more new info about it before being judge and jury ourselves.
Why doesn't this one have the same paint scheme as what we've seen on the top?In fact i don't know; therefore my question ... even more so since AI and ps is more a mystery to me!
As such at first sight I thought it looks legit since it shows some movement, also in the background but hey, what all can be done by AI nowadays! therefore it looks very fishy, in fact just surreal strange to me but I don't know.
View attachment 763550
X-31 (never went supersonic as far as I know, but capable)Sorry, a kind of off-topic (but-relevant) question: has there been atailless supersonic aircraft before, that has been publically known to fly, or are the Chinese making a world-first? The only thing I can think of is the X-43, which afaik, had its tail removed for some tests, but I don't know if went supersonic in those instances,
Yup that's the plane I was thinking of, just had a brain malfunction.X-31 (never went supersonic as far as I know, but capable)