NeilChapman
Interested 3rd party
- Joined
- 14 December 2015
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- 536
Where in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) is there anything limiting the building/refuelling of reactors?
Then why is Australia entertaining the construction of SSNs whose reactors are effectively on-loan from the US/UK because Australia can't build or refuel them because of NPT obligations?
Enrichment of uranium to the 97% enriched state required by nuclear weapons and the LOB reactors that power US and UK submarines is a clear breach of Australia's NPT obligations.
Are you suggesting Australia should withdraw from the NPT?
The point is though, Australia CAN'T build or refuel LOB reactors (unless they import the HEU ie with the close support of the US or UK), which is hardly independent.
They could however build and refuel LEU reactors because LEU cannot readily be converted into weapons grade material, it's already distributed via a well regulated global industry (of which Australia is already a part) and doesn't impact NPT obligations.
Use of LEU technology actually opens a whole series of possibilities for Australia beyond SSNs, without the need for an Australian uranium enrichment industry. It's a wonder the Australian Liberal Party, which is always banging on about SMRs and the role of nuclear in a future Australian energy mix, aren't pushing harder for it.
It seems it's not a 'clear' breach of anything or the RAN and the government (elected by the people) wouldn't be pursuing these boats.