Without a hull shot I wouldn't say she's necessarially very far from getting wet, plenty of topside work you can do while floating if the hull's water tight. But the drydock itself looks too full of crap to be close.Well, finally a really fine recent image of the Type 003 carrier taken on 31 May ...
But IMO that does not look like a launch on 3 June! :-(
(Image by @Maxar via @CSIS)
View attachment 678983
Eh, maybe. From what I've read the Chinese are both still figuring out reactors capable of powering a supercarrier, and are competing with the civilian electrical industry for limited reactor production. As well, based on what they did with the 052C destroyers I think they'll want to debug the Type 003 before they move on to a new design to limit design risk.Make sense. If you grow a Kuznetsov from 65 000 to 85 000 tons and adds catapults... it still lacks nuclear propulsion however. Considering the Chinese pace, this won't last long. Next one, nuclear ?
And while the tense is raising on when - eventually on Friday as it seems - the Type 003 carrier is being launched … here another new image. Looks like some sort of small red flags all along on top of these shelters covering the catapults.
View attachment 679650
And while the tense is raising on when - eventually on Friday as it seems - the Type 003 carrier is being launched … here another new image. Looks like some sort of small red flags all along on top of these shelters covering the catapults.
View attachment 679650
An interesting image Deino, looks like the type 003 is only equipped with three catapults due to the fact that only three jet blast deflectors being visible.
Pretty speechless
She is out of the drydock ... the Type 003 aircraft carrier "Fujian" is out"(Via @浩汉防务-菜兵 from Weibo)
View attachment 679744
It’s the province closest to Taiwan."Food chain" - that's appropriate.
I guess we know now - "electromagnetic catapult-assisted launch system" per CNN.
Since they had no prior experience with either steam or EM catapults it would probably make more sense for them to just go for the latter.I guess we know now - "electromagnetic catapult-assisted launch system" per CNN.
I’d wait for a more technically minded source to comment. They probably just looked up the wiki article.
They had test rigs for both, with steam presumably being the backup if EM hit development problems. Couldn’t speak to the likelihood of it being one or the other; clearly EM would be desirable. I don’t think the Chinese have indicated either way. Do we even have any idea what the propulsion type is?Since they had no prior experience with either steam or EM catapults it would probably make more sense for them to just go for the latter.I guess we know now - "electromagnetic catapult-assisted launch system" per CNN.
I’d wait for a more technically minded source to comment. They probably just looked up the wiki article.
I’d wait for a more technically minded source to comment. They probably just looked up the wiki article.