I didn't forget China, but the idea is the same. China might be more willing to give up its vulnerable heavy silo-based ICBMs than its new small road-mobiles. Heavy, silo-based, MIRVed ICBMs are destabilizing no matter who has them.
China hasn't been willing to give up anything really, it cites its "No First Use" policy as a reason for why countries shouldn't worry about them.
However much I may personally dislike their government (and their ongoing crimes) it should be noted that China isn’t and hasn’t to this point been party to any nuclear arms agreement that has required it to give up classes or numbers of nuclear weapons or delivery systems.
Considering that, and that (despite paranoid-inflected comment above) the PRC’s nuclear forces have been and remain dwarfed by their US and Russian equivalents then what are we actually talking about them ever refusing to give up re: nuclear weapons and delivery systems?
Amounting to anything much beyond non-specific “I don’t trust them-Chinese” sentiments by certain posters?