The roadmap is there, The Block III were supposed to be the "true stealth" variant. While Block I and II is for maturation and weapons integration.
im confused as i read on recently

Block I - maturation airframe and equipment, Integration

Block II is supposed to be Stealth but I read that it was an upgrade from Block 1... to Block 2 but not the internal weapon bay.. semi-Stealth also uses 6th generation equipment Radar and data network, and test and operators use these.

Block "EX" "not called block III" is Internal Weapon Bay (True stealth variant) also the 6th generation not the 5th.

there is no block III :S

I will double recheck these...

Poland (more likely to get Block II or EX as they have been enquired about these) and S.Arbabic (I think they will go KAAN indeed), and Ukraine are interested purchase these (also they are interested buy KAAN too).
 
KF-21 Block I
The block I focuses on the air-superiority capabilities.

KF-21 Block II
After further developments, the KF-21 will become a swing role fighters with attack and reconnaissance capabilities added.

Potential variants
KF-21N
In September 2022, KAI unveiled a model of the KF-21N, a carrier-based version of the fighter. In May 2022, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) decided to drop funding for the CVX, a planned small aircraft carrier capable of operating STOVL F-35B jets. It was later clarified that the MND would consider purchasing a larger aircraft carrier design, if a maritime jet fighter could be developed indigenously. Anticipating this, KAI began a preliminary design concept to make the KF-21 carrier-capable. The wings are 20% larger to ensure safety and stabilization when taking off and landing, and they fold for more compact storage. Structural changes would make the airframe capable of CATOBAR and STOBAR operations.

If the Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN) decides to procure an aircraft carrier large enough to operate fighters and identifies a requirement, KAI claims it would be able to build the KF-21N "in a few years.

KF-21EA
One of the three new variants revealed in June 2024. Will serve as an electronic warfare aircraft comparable to the EA-18G Growler. This variant would be based on the two-seat KF-21B, with a position at the back for the electronic warfare officer.

KF-21EX "Block III" (Change name to "EX")
One of the three new variants revealed in June 2024. Will reportedly be a fully stealth variant with reduced radar cross section and internal weapons carriage. It is also expected to integrate the Next Air Combat System (NACS), a combat network for the air force.

KF-21SA
One of the three new variants revealed in June 2024. Will reportedly be a variant specifically dedicated to the export market, with opportunities for the client to modify the aircraft.
 
Last edited:
The naval Boramae sounds interesting djpowell1984, but why the indecision between CATOBAR and STOBAR operations? I thought that CATOBAR would be the best option for the South Korean Navy as that would offer better options for especially where large aircraft are concerned like naval AWACS and for COD.
 
The naval Boramae sounds interesting djpowell1984, but why the indecision between CATOBAR and STOBAR operations? I thought that CATOBAR would be the best option for the South Korean Navy as that would offer better options for especially where large aircraft are concerned like naval AWACS and for COD.
Agreed, I think KF-21 "N" i think it is a good option for Carrier for South Korea, (Better over F-35 "B" as local so supports local jobs and common part of repairing or replacing part for Air Force and Navy Air force S.Korea,) STOBAR/CATOBAR carrier.

CATOBAR / STOBAR i think both will work well, STOBAR might cheaper to build than CATOBAR. yet might limited CATOBAR ie AWCAS etc.

I think Naval AWACS in the future, we will more like will be Sea Guardian type, not E-3 Hawkeyes type. which STOBAR are better optional (I think E-3 modern Hawkeyes will be good as Manned so Jammer or hack, or cant connection to Sea Guardian) if they want this so CATOBAR will better optional yet will stress airframe and reduce life service compare to STOBAR (which they more airframe life due no stress by CATO.
 
Last edited:
Great set of photos...

GkIy-qvXkAAnq0J
GkIy_9YWEAAmWXe
GkIzy4gbsAA0GoW
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom