Rafale has less string attach (much less ITAR components for example). We can operate them much more freely.
Very true. But conversely, KF-21 is supposed to be the plane that could continue using American armaments after F-16s eventually retires, although those planes have plenty of time before they would.

Having no strings attached usually comes at a cost, since French/European armaments are - generally speaking - more expensive due to the different economies of scale, although one could also argue some of them are more expensive because they are also more capable, eg. Meteor.

Anyways, for a non-aligned country like Indonesia, it makes ton of sense to have an ITAR-free option, especially if there already is a history of sanction against it.
 
By the way, the designation of the radar has been revealed as APY-16K. Have no idea why they went with a Y instead of the usual G, but anyways. Maybe it was because they wanted to use 16, but since it has long been taken on the APG prefix, they've chosen APY instead? I'm not sure if that even makes sense, but I can't really think of any other reason. For example, Korean ECM pods like the ALQ-88K or -200K or AAQ-333 FLIR also doesn't overlap with American designations.

Anyways, seems like it's another case of butchering designation system definitions/creating ambiguity.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom