Scott Kenny
ACCESS: Above Top Secret
- Joined
- 15 May 2023
- Messages
- 9,200
- Reaction score
- 10,262
With how cheap Tamirs are, my personal inclination would be to use it as the absolute last ditch against leakers. It's probably at the ragged edge of what Tamir is capable of engaging in terms of closing speed, but it's one last swing at the leaker before it hits.Do we have reliable information on whether the last-ditch intercepts at very low altitude used tamir/Iron Dome interceptors (presumably making last-ditch/marginal/trash-fire engagements) or stunner/David's Sling interceptors?
It should be obvious that Iron Dome is optimized for very short range rocket artillery and mortar fire, and that Arrow and in particular David's Sling would have been doing the heavy lifting. But I just want to know what the Israeli tactics and doctrine are - do they hold fire, given that Tamir is of marginal benefit, or do they pop off some Tamir-trash fire and hope for the best given that the cost of a Tamir is so low and the cost is so marginal? Iron Dome should be linked in with the overall BMD system for aerospace defense, so they should be able to get good pre-warning and cueing to make the best shots possible if that was what their commanders decided.
Or hell, maybe Tamir is capable of regularly engaging Mach 3+ closing targets?