More seriously, it seems French MoD has already ordered the UCAS recently and the priority is with the FAS (Nuclear forces) since it is increasingly blatant that the combo Rafale + Fat 330 can't do the mission any more longer (but does even the 330 can do NoE flying without playing Little Thumb with its rivets and engines?)....

Le Rafale au standard F5 aura la capacité d'être accompagné par un drone de combat furtif opéré depuis son bord.

Les premières commandes ont été notifiées aux industriels il y a quelques semaines.
---------------------------------------

The Rafale with the F5 standard will have the capacity to be accompanied by a stealth combat drone operated from its board.

The first orders were notified to manufacturers a few weeks ago.

In the background, I hope that someone, aside of me, would be interested by the exclusive sale/handover of the remaining C-135 before this was announced. I have never heard exclusive handover of State Assets months before the reason behind was revealed to the public (and before Mr Macron became president to say the least). MoD is no Wall street but still... Today, that sounds awfully strange.
 
Last edited:
More seriously, it seems French MoD has already ordered the UCAS recently and the priority is with the FAS (Nuclear forces) since it is increasingly blatant that the combo Rafale + Fat 330 can't do the mission any more longer (but does even the 330 can do NoE flying without playing Little Thumb with its rivets and engines?)....



In the background, I hope that someone, aside of me, would be interested by the exclusive sale/handover of the remaining C-135 before this was announced. I have never heard exclusive handover of State Assets months before the reason behind was revealed to the public (and before Mr Macron became president to say the least). MoD is no Wall street but still... Today, that sounds awfully strange.

Yes. And that is a very bad prospect for SCAF.
 
But CAF isn't due until 2045 so some kind of interim solution is required, might as well have a new UCAV in 2033 than wait another 12 years.
(Even 2033 is slow work when you consider Neuron was 2012 and all the work on equivalent systems around the world since then).
 
But CAF isn't due until 2045 so some kind of interim solution is required, might as well have a new UCAV in 2033 than wait another 12 years.
(Even 2033 is slow work when you consider Neuron was 2012 and all the work on equivalent systems around the world since then).
And its not like EF Tranche 5 and LTE wont happen which may also contain an UCAV for some countries (maybe only for EW but then again doesn't matter).
 

 
Last edited:
View: https://youtu.be/piyW9Yma4wA


-1H48'40": Spain, Germany and France summit in December 2024, during which the demonstrator (probably model or 3D images) will be shown for the first time.


View: https://youtu.be/z2N7UjGhNfc


-1H25'45": FCAS: Summit in December 2024; presentation of the demonstrator; Spain, Germany, France; ability to decide on the principles of the program for the future with political questions: export, but also operational questions: what the plane looks like, its weight, its capabilities to correspond well to the needs of French deterrence for the FAS, to be able to land on an aircraft carrier if necessary.

Surprising, given that it was indicated in November 2023:

Major General Jean-Luc Moritz, who leads the French segment of the trilateral effort, also known by its French acronym SCAF, told reporters Thursday that he expects to downselect to two designs (among four) by June 2024 and have a final design in hand “by” March of 2025.
 


Oh wait, it seems like this comes as a response to the new Trinity House agreement with the UK published today. I'll make a separate thread for it since it covers a vast amount of new agreements for arms procurement, not just UAS, but now it makes ton of sense.

Now I wonder where Italy and Spain fits in though.
 

Oh wait, it seems like this comes as a response to the new Trinity House agreement with the UK published today. I'll make a separate thread for it since it covers a vast amount of new agreements for arms procurement, not just UAS, but now it makes ton of sense.

Now I wonder where Italy and Spain fits in though.
Probaly join given that it will be compatible with EF LTE, FCAS and GCAP. Everyone can use it and get a piece of the pie. Just don't repeat the EF fun
 
Everyone can remember what happened to the EF back in the 1980s can't they? History should not repeat itself, the countries involved should think back so it cannot and should not happen again.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241104-121427.png
    Screenshot_20241104-121427.png
    895.5 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:
This documentary has already been re-run several times, I'm not even sure if this note on the Dassault website dates from the first broadcast.
It is a 2024 documentary produced by Golden Light Productions, on behalf of the French channel RMC Découverte.

I hadn't seen it yet. So I didn't know the last part with the NGF-FCAS/SCAF. Thanks for sharing.
 
MBDA doing a great job of reinventing NSM
Yeah in the end its a smaller JSM/NSM but im not against it. If we can fit for in an MFOM Pod nice but don't but it in a VLS. Use thoses god damn pods you designed which are very close to the size of an NSM canister.
 
European air force have no direction and no money to drive any new fighter program, soon our Air Force will look like a third world AIr Force.
I understand the goal of the remote carrier and am all for it but the idea with the VLS is just stupid. It can't help fighters with its puny range and also isnt as good as existing strike weapons like Tomahawk if strike is the goal. An deck launched NSM like missile with land attack focus? Sure. Something you can use in 3 Services? Yes but please use it right. Another question i have is if this will replace the JFS-M design for both the Remote Carrier part and as extended MLRS munition as MBDA's offer?
 
"For range is an important issue for the New Generation Fighter, but the three nations involved in the FCAS project have not yet agreed on a common architecture, probably not least because the partners have different needs."
View: https://x.com/hartpunkt/status/1862126702610006390
A article from CPM going a little bit into more details about FCAS and some problems
Edit: https://defence-network.com/fcas-ngws-zukunftsprojekte-der-luftwaffe/
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom