Influenced by French requirements, the company’s Smart Glider product is being offered for future integration with the nation’s Dassault Mirage 2000 and/or Rafale combat aircraft, and a successor Franco-German Future Combat Air System (FCAS). A powered version of the wingkit-equipped weapon, named the Smart Cruiser, is also being proposed.
To admit - and I'm sure some won't like my opinion - but I'm more impressed than by the Tempest.
Images via FlugRevue
View attachment 615326View attachment 615327View attachment 615328View attachment 615329
An interesting looking design judging from the photo's posted above, how does this fighter compare size wise with Rafael bigger?
Airbus unmanned aircraft system called "Remote Carrier"During the presentation, another mock-up has been freed from canvas - on the right side of picture.
What's this - new missile?
This article from 28/05/19 is a fake. It was only to joke.Was waiting for this kind of comment to post this important new :
Dassault confident that internet will be able to spell Rafael correctly by 2045: three injured in press briefing
Yesterday a Paris press conference intended to address an ongoing problem with a fighter aircraft’s name led to violence. The event presented by Eric Frappier, Head of Nomenclature & Onom…hushkit.net
Edit: I need to brush up on reading skills.Airbus unmanned aircraft system called "Remote Carrier"
A new category of weapon is ‘Remote Carriers’, a family of expendable air-launched autonomous platforms that deliver multiple effects, whether lethal or non-lethal, as well as new services for munitions such as intelligence, targeting, and deception of enemy sensors. Three categories are considered, of weight classes of 120 and 240 kg developed by MBDA, and a heavier one developed by Airbus. Such remote carriers would function as baits and decoys, carry additional weapons ahead of the manned aircraft and closer to heavily defended targets, collect ISR or establish communications nodes.
This article from 28/05/19 is a fake. It was only to joke.Was waiting for this kind of comment to post this important new :
Dassault confident that internet will be able to spell Rafael correctly by 2045: three injured in press briefing
Yesterday a Paris press conference intended to address an ongoing problem with a fighter aircraft’s name led to violence. The event presented by Eric Frappier, Head of Nomenclature & Onom…hushkit.net
Ah, OK, sorry! Yes Delta, i know, that is why I posted it
From a French point of vue*, your opinion is among the better DeinoTo admit - and I'm sure some won't like my opinion - but I'm more impressed than by the Tempest.
Images via FlugRevue
View attachment 615328
Rafale is a very beautiful aircraft, but this thing definitively from my personal point of view is ugly, ugly inlets, ugly forebody too coarse, horribly ugly canopy, Rafale delicacy and beauty is gone, it might be stealthy, but what such an ugly beast, yuckyBetter photo :
Ah, OK, sorry! Yes Delta, i know, that is why I posted it
yes it is generic stealth, basically it is ultra basic, they reduced the whole airframe to the most basic flying elements and it will fly relying on thrust vectoring, and very high thrust to weight ratio, using electronic warfare and stealth as main defensive assets very good stealth, but very low reliance on aerodynamic controlAh, OK, sorry! Yes Delta, i know, that is why I posted it
No prob
Anyway, seem to me this mockup is very "stylized" , I mean , one could see much more details on the previous Dassault model.
Appart from the V-Tails, it looks very "generic stealth" and non-detailed. And i'm surprised how flat it is, specially from this angle :
View attachment 615349
the canopy is not much higher than the fuselage back.
Hmm same fuselage, wing, empennage configuration as BAES' mockup. But a different ugly forward fuselage. Might as well just call it Le Tempest
https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/pre...e-for-future-combat-air-system-programme.html
There doesn't seem much in the way of actual news coming out. Current 30m EUR study contract signed back in Feb, maybe another 2 year contract at the end of the year.
Has anyone seen any information on these different "remote carriers"?
Relax, it was a tongue in cheek comment.
That said, I did like the earlier Dassault concept better as well, although the tail configuration on this one is fine by me. It's primarily the canopy which is so weird, very low profile yet long nose (visibility for carrier ops?)... I can't make up my mind whether it's possibly deliberate (supersonic drag reduction enabled by relying on an EODAS-like situational-awareness FLIR?) or merely an indication that the design is far from properly elaborated so far.
Just a tongue in cheek response, cause, no, it's not the same config as the BAe mockup.
Mmmhh, this is where I don't agree, Typhoon and rafale are two delta-canards, true, but i don't see Tempest using these fins as elevators/tailplanes, they are just fins, where on this last Dassault mockup (as on the YF-23), its clearly V-Tail working both as fin and elevators (and maybe for roll too). So clearly a different aerodynamic config here. As for what is best, no idea.It's pretty similar but that doesn't mean copied e.g. Typhoon and Rafale
Yeah well, alas stealth makes them all look the same. Look TFX/J_31/KFX and all...Fuselage layout is the same: bays, engines, intake positions. Wing planform is the same but smaller. Tail geometry is similar, but bigger and more canted.
Ahh...Does size really matter ... but seriously, again I liked the earlier concept nose cause it was clearly designed for carrier landing, as the Rafale.And then the pointy nose for Dassault's standard tiny radar?
I think they are as "generic" as this last Mockup. And i suppose it depends also from where they come, Airbus or dassault.But then there's pictures and videos of other configurations with canards, fins, finless, different wings. Where's the engineering detail behind any of these?
Hey, you ever looked at T-50 closely?Mixed opinion, too. Not very beautiful, but IMHO, most stealth aircraft since F-117 are ugly. Never been a great fan - except perhaps the YF-23, all the others, russians, Chinese, American, are ugly and all look the same. The chinese types are typical of that. Give me a Su-47 or Su-35 any day.