Energia - Buran Space Transportation System

«ENERGIA-BURAN» - FLIGHT OF DREAMS:
DECLASSIFIED HISTORY IN THE DOCUMENTS OF RGANTD
(*)

Today in Tver at the All-Russian festival of historical films “KinoVECHE” opened an exhibition of documents from the RGANTD funds, telling about the most complex russian technical invention of the 20th century - the Buran space shuttle.

(*) Russian State Archive of Scientific and Engenering Documentation


View attachment 741753

View attachment 741754

View attachment 741755

View attachment 741756

:rolleyes:
rgantd undefeated at publishing mirrored photos in false color
1727252990188.png 1727253043939.png
 
Last edited:
I just stumbled across this Buran video from Retro Space:


Restored field sequential color TV footage of the Shuttle Buran cockpit camera during reentry. Some maneuvering is shown, performed by the autopilot system, as the shuttle glides towards the landing field. Probably in real speed, but the actual video framerate is unknown.
The original black and white raw footage is from buran.ru Similar to Apollo (and early US Shuttle) TV cameras the system was field sequential - each image was taken through a different color filter, in sequence. Reconstructing this sequence it's possible to recover color, at the expense of motion artifacts.
 
How could these people let this stuff go to waste!
Lack of funds due to the collapse of the Soviet Union however the Buran could've made money and been preserved if Kazakstan had made it and the centre it was stored at a tourist-attraction.
 
Last edited:
Different RCS in the nose?

From https://medium.com/@energiaburan/je...m-how-npo-molniya-improved-buran-4d2f7f9d3eaa

"The “standard” Buran nose RCS cluster has 6 maneuvering thruster nozzles on the top surface and four each on the left and right sides for a total of 14 nozzles (unlike the Shuttle, Buran did not have any vernier thrusters in the nose cluster, only in the two aft clusters). But from the second flight orbiter onward, the vehicles have two extra nozzles either side of the cluster for a total of 18 nozzles."

Buran 1.01 (top) - Buran 1.02 (below)

Sin título-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Lack of funds due to the collapse of the Soviet Union however the Buran could've made money and been preserved if Kazakstan had made it and the centre it was stored at a tourist-attraction.

The whole Space Shuttle saga (Shuttle / Buran / Hermes) was an evolutionary deadend similar to dinosaurs. They weren't RLV or TSTO or SSTO but big reusable payload fairings, manned. Not worth the hundred billions sunk.
 
The whole Space Shuttle saga (Shuttle / Buran / Hermes) was an evolutionary deadend similar to dinosaurs.

The point I'm making is that if Kazakstan had taken the pains to properly maintain and preserve the site along with the Shuttles and the Energia rocket-launchers with proper marketing they could've made money by using them as a tourist attraction.
 
Those who like to believe it was Buran that bled the USSR dry forget expenses—the Soviet-Afghan war and this railway project:

Without those two excesses, Buran may have flown a few more times and/or had been retired with a bit more grace.

The Tran-Siberian itself took 71 years to electrify:

Maybe the BAM will cross the Bering Strait…one day…
 
Last edited:
Interesting article on NPO Energia's shuttle (and giant rocket) projects, prior to the Energia-Buran program. The article is in Spanish, but can be translated into English almost perfectly.

"On November 23, 1972, now half a century ago, the huge Soviet N1 moon rocket lifted off for the fourth and last time from Area 110 of the Baikonur Cosmodrome. The three previous launches had ended in failure, but this time all the engineers and technicians at TsKBEM, the former OKB-1 design bureau of Sergey Korolyov and now headed by Vasili Mishin, hoped that the big rocket would succeed in reaching orbit."


bibmyscnuebdhukmz2vaci5e5nzjrhcc.jpg

5v8m99q8u1rfln295xnl3n1hu9zm6zll.jpg

4hpet9admjni5xgjptue3pg68l6rcgw0.jpg

a45b41tjmlg356ucz5xeqfavx5qcjkff.jpg

:rolleyes:
 
The Buran's control panel

From Eureka site:

"The Buran's cockpit control panel was given the generic designation SOI (Sistema Otobrazhenia Informatsii/Система Отображения Информации, “Information Representation System”), the name given to the controls of all Russian spacecraft.

The Buran SOI, christened Vega, was designed for up to six cosmonauts. The main commander and pilot stations (RM, Rabocheie Mesto) were designated RM1 and RM2. The rest (RM3-6) were to be occupied by flight engineers to control the robot arm, airlock, extendable docking module and other systems. The Buran SOI was developed through the joint effort of NPO Energia (prime contractor for the Energia-Buran program) and NPO Molniya (orbiter office), with the help of EMZ Myasyschev and the aeronautical organizations LII, TsAGI and the Zhukovsky Academy. One of the biggest challenges was to reduce the mass of the SOI, which in its final version exceeded 90 kg. The SOI of the OK-GLI (Vega-GLI) allows us to appreciate what the operational panel would have looked like - except for some differences, such as the gas levers and reactor instruments, absent on the orbiter."

More:


soi.jpg

:rolleyes:
 
Remnants of the Visual Navigation Measurement System (NIVS), on the Buran 1.02 located in the Baikonur Cosmodrome's MZK building.
The NIVS was permanently mounted on a special porthole in the aft flight deck and had to be manually aligned with the GSP module by the crew. (Bart Hendrickx)

2k1-81-enhance-2x.jpg

vlcsnap-2024-10-08-09h02m18s709 Panorama-DeNoiseAI-clear.jpg

nivs-098-enhance-2x.jpg

:rolleyes:
 
Buran 1K, the one that flew in space, was built with all the plumbing for a pair of AL-31F turbofans, seating on both sides of the vertical tail. In fact they almost flew in December 1988, but were retired only a few weeks before the flight, the empty spaces being filled with thermal protection sheeting. And I'm NOT talking about OK-GLI, with had four turbofans but never went in space. But 1K, the first Buran that flew late 1988.

Do you have any picture of that ? would be pretty awesome. AFAIK it was the closest, ever, that turbofans flew in orbit.

For the sake of comparison, the Space Shuttle turbojets, dropped in 1974, were to be in a removeable pack to be bolted to the orbiters belly only for subsonic ferry flights - look ma, no need for 747-SCA nor mate/demate device. They would not have flown in orbit.

Buran advantage in comparison was that, since the SSMEs ( = RD-0120s) were expendable and on the Energiya booster, the Buran orbiter rear end was available to put the OMS. So unlike the US Shuttle, no need for OMS pods on both side of the vertical tail... thus the place was "free" for the AL-31F.
SHUTTLE : SSME + OMS pods + F401 turbofans : tail, side pods, belly.
BURAN : RD-0120 + OMS + AL31F turbofans : Energiya, tail, side pods.
 
Buran 1K, the one that flew in space, was built with all the plumbing for a pair of AL-31F turbofans, seating on both sides of the vertical tail. In fact they almost flew in December 1988, but were retired only a few weeks before the flight, the empty spaces being filled with thermal protection sheeting. And I'm NOT talking about OK-GLI, with had four turbofans but never went in space. But 1K, the first Buran that flew late 1988.

Do you have any picture of that ? would be pretty awesome. AFAIK it was the closest, ever, that turbofans flew in orbit.

For the sake of comparison, the Space Shuttle turbojets, dropped in 1974, were to be in a removeable pack to be bolted to the orbiters belly only for subsonic ferry flights - look ma, no need for 747-SCA nor mate/demate device. They would not have flown in orbit.

Buran advantage in comparison was that, since the SSMEs ( = RD-0120s) were expendable and on the Energiya booster, the Buran orbiter rear end was available to put the OMS. So unlike the US Shuttle, no need for OMS pods on both side of the vertical tail... thus the place was "free" for the AL-31F.
SHUTTLE : SSME + OMS pods + F401 turbofans : tail, side pods, belly.
BURAN : RD-0120 + OMS + AL31F turbofans : Energiya, tail, side pods.
I thought I'd jump in.
I don't think I have anything with the plumbing itself, but ODU base block integration footage (courtesy of buran․ru) offers some glimpses of the VRDU (jet engine) niches
1729176932482.jpeg 1729176963390.jpeg 1729177497114.jpeg
here's a "naked" nacelle being lowered into a niche
1729177008916.jpeg
and some shots of the empty niche before it was covered with aluminum panels
1729177520649.jpeg 1729177535971.jpeg
actual engines were never fitted to 1K, as the jets were cancelled in late 1987/early 1988, but a good approximation of how they'd look on an orbiter are test articles OK-M and OK-MT before 1988

1729177804979.png 1729177857165.png

and the nacelles themselves, mock-ups (probably for OK-M) on the left, a "real" nacelle with TPS tiles on the right
1729177970103.png 1729177983073.png
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom