I'm going to be sick...Readiness for the first flight of the second ship (1.02) was estimated at 95%
I'm going to be sick...Readiness for the first flight of the second ship (1.02) was estimated at 95%
There was no harm in open vacuum conditions to the turbojet engine on the Buran - the engine nacelle was a sealed capsule maintaining a comfortable temperature, which was opened during the descent into the atmosphere after passing hypersonic speedThat thread is dynamite. So the turbofans had little moving doors to protect them - I presume from the inferno of reentry, the deadly superheated plasma coming from the nose and from below ?
Which brings me to a question. Clearly Buran AL-31F would have been exposed to the vacuum of space. I'm wondering what kind of damage would vacuum do to a vanilla turbofan ?
In the bottom picture the background is an original photo of cosmonaut Pavel Vinogradov from the International Space Station.And meanwhile, in an alternate universe...
Source: buran.ru
View attachment 747366
View attachment 747367
In the bottom picture the background is an original photo of cosmonaut Pavel Vinogradov from the International Space Station.
And in the top illustration there is a 360-degree panorama in 4K format
This is a photograph of Albert Pushkarev, and the TASS archives have his color version of this photoGreat job Vadim, thanks for sharing!
On another note, November 15 (a new anniversary of the Buran flight) is not far away. I hope that by that day the RGANTD (Russian State Archive of Scientific and Engenering Documentation) will continue to declassify material about the Buran program. Something tells me that there is still tons of information archived!
Here below I publish one more photo for our collection, from an anonymous author.
View attachment 747419
Didn’t MPC/Start make 1/288 models of these? Any die-casts?
Now Start no longer works. Nowadays, models are made using the illustrations of the site buran.ru using 3D printing, of poor quality and in violation of my copyright))Didn’t MPC/Start make 1/288 models of these? Any die-casts?
This would be great for a future episode of For All Mankind.Now Start no longer works. Nowadays, models are made using the illustrations of the site buran.ru using 3D printing, of poor quality and in violation of my copyright))
But my 3D computer models are much more accurate and detailed.
For example, a variant of the Buran layout with a maximum crew size - this is not on buran.ru, you are the first to see it: View attachment 747512
A Caspian Sea Voyage.Я исправил эту картинку
Buran's final injection into orbit and braking impulse for deorbiting were upside down.I read (in an article in the Journal of Rockets) about a proposal to fly Columbia type orbiters "heads up."
Was that Buran's flight profile?
The Space Shuttle was flown heads up during the latter half of the program.I read (in an article in the Journal of Rockets) about a proposal to fly Columbia type orbiters "heads up."
Should have said 5 or 6, OV-101 is another one.OV-99 Challenger
...
OV-102 Columbia
...
OV-103 Discovery
OV-104 Atlantis
...
OV-105 Endeavor
Cool...!! Thanks Vadim!I’ll add something that is not on www.buran.ru, and that no one has seen yet))
...and NPO Molniya is designing not only the Hermes thermal protection, but also winged reusable first-stage blocks for the Ariane-5 rocketSide note:
ESA consider for a time those ejection seats and suits for Hermes as escape system,
near the end of program in 1991.
could that this project ?...and NPO Molniya is designing not only the Hermes thermal protection, but also winged reusable first-stage blocks for the Ariane-5 rocket
See https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.IAC-06-D2.P.2.09Yeah, Bargouzin (2000s project) was a CNES-TSNIIMASH project with NPO Molniya and Dassault involvment..
WOW a Aerodynamic cover for Ariane 5 Core reuse !No.
Here is this project - with much more interesting aerodynamics:
Wow. Completely new for me. Thank you!No.
Here is this project - with much more interesting aerodynamics:
There is little information - only the appearance of the reusable lower central block (as a result of the work). Gliding landing, no enginesWOW a Aerodynamic cover for Ariane 5 Core reuse !
Had this jet engines for return to Launch site ?
and let me guess, ESA and ArianeSpace consider this reuse as waste of Time ?
Yes, in terms of functionality Buran is better than the shuttleIf the Buran had became operational would it have been better than the Space Shuttle?
Yes, in terms of functionality Buran is better than the shuttle
There is little information - only the appearance of the reusable lower central block (as a result of the work). Gliding landing, no engines
How was it better?