What would be interresting (or atleast the performance it could achieve) when we take a POLAR sized GMLRS-ER using an SDB glider with an GMLRS warhead (i heard they had tested something like that). Range could be quite bigAnd we're back around to POLAR. Because if you're putting GMLRS in a VLS, you might as well take advantage of the cell depth and extend the rocket motor significantly.
What would be interresting (or atleast the performance it could achieve) when we take a POLAR sized GMLRS-ER using an SDB glider with an GMLRS warhead (i heard they had tested something like that). Range could be quite big
Zumwalt is currently at HII’s Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, Miss., for a yard period preparing the ship to accommodate CPS. Part of that overhaul is removing the destroyer’s 155mm Advanced Gun Systems and fitting it with four large diameter tubes to accommodate the missiles for CPS. Wolfe said this work is complete and went well. The ship is expected to come out of the yard next year.
The CPS system is modular, featuring an all-up round missile and a separate modular payload adapter. Wolfe said the Navy is currently testing the adapter, the missile and the eject system.
AP article has a few interesting shots of Zumwalt in the yard.
Stealth destroyer to be home for 1st hypersonic weapon on a US warship
The U.S. Navy is making progress in deploying its first shipborne hypersonic weapon. Workers at a Mississippi shipyard have finished installing missile tubes on the USS Zumwalt that will replace twin turrets from a gun system that was never activated because it was too expensive.apnews.com
Unless you can claim with certainty that there's a turret in the shed on her deck it looks like both turrets are gone. All that's left of the aft turret is the non-rotating housing of the barrel.So far, looks like they've only pulled one of the turrets. Are we sure they are both going away?
Unless you can claim with certainty that there's a turret in the shed on her deck it looks like both turrets are gone. All that's left of the aft turret is the non-rotating housing of the barrel.
I honestly think it's just a temporary cover they slapped over the hole.Oh, you're right. I mistakenly saw that as the turret itself. But you're correct that it is just the aft barrel enclosure. On second glance I see they have dropped in some sort of octagonal structure where the turret itself would have sat. (Or maybe that was under the turret originally? Hard to tell.)
Replacing a non-functional gun with a set of big missile tubes is still upgunning.“Up gun” seems like a poor choice of words…
First Look At Stealth Destroyer's Hypersonic Missile Launchers
USS Zumwalt will pack a dozen long-range hypersonic missiles, but one of its Advanced Gun Systems still remains after the refit.www.twz.com
They choose the strangest times to stop reading this forum.So much wrong there. They are using a Jan 2024 pic to say the aft gun is there. But only the barrel house is still there in the later images.
A while back, I speculated on the possibility that both of the Zumwalt class DDGs' Advanced Gun System turrets could be removed and replaced with eight six- or seven-round Tomahawk launch canisters. As shared on The War Zone, a rendering on display at the Surface Navy Association symposium depicted a Zumwalt class ship with seven-round canisters loaded into at least two of the Advanced Payload Module launch tubes:First Look At Stealth Destroyer's Hypersonic Missile Launchers
USS Zumwalt will pack a dozen long-range hypersonic missiles, but one of its Advanced Gun Systems still remains after the refit.www.twz.com
Needs to be noted that the Ticonderoga class never did such thing, hell pretty sure the captain will suplex the idiot who suggest they do such.hypothetically carry a total of 128 to 136 Tomahawks which is comparable to the Ticonderoga class CG. With only AGS turret removed, each Zumwalt class DDG could still carry a total of 104 to 108 Tomahawks which is more than that of the Arleigh Burke class DDGs.
With the recent report of cost growths on the Burke restart, it'd be interesting to see how the cost per ship in a longer production run compares to the new Burkes.I still think they need to build more....