And we're back around to POLAR. Because if you're putting GMLRS in a VLS, you might as well take advantage of the cell depth and extend the rocket motor significantly.
What would be interresting (or atleast the performance it could achieve) when we take a POLAR sized GMLRS-ER using an SDB glider with an GMLRS warhead (i heard they had tested something like that). Range could be quite big
 
What would be interresting (or atleast the performance it could achieve) when we take a POLAR sized GMLRS-ER using an SDB glider with an GMLRS warhead (i heard they had tested something like that). Range could be quite big

Yeah, that would go a long, long way. I'm not sure the last increment from a glider would offset the potential of a much larger bang in a purely ballistic version.

The other proposed weapon from the same era that might be worth revisiting is the Vertical-launch Autonomous Attack System, which was a VL ASROC booster with multiple (3 or 4, I think) LOCAAS attack drones as a payload. LOCAAS seems like exactly the sort of munition that would be useful these days.
 

Zumwalt is currently at HII’s Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, Miss., for a yard period preparing the ship to accommodate CPS. Part of that overhaul is removing the destroyer’s 155mm Advanced Gun Systems and fitting it with four large diameter tubes to accommodate the missiles for CPS. Wolfe said this work is complete and went well. The ship is expected to come out of the yard next year.

The CPS system is modular, featuring an all-up round missile and a separate modular payload adapter. Wolfe said the Navy is currently testing the adapter, the missile and the eject system.
 
AP article has a few interesting shots of Zumwalt in the yard.
 
AP article has a few interesting shots of Zumwalt in the yard.

So far, looks like they've only pulled one of the turrets. Are we sure they are both going away?
 
So far, looks like they've only pulled one of the turrets. Are we sure they are both going away?
Unless you can claim with certainty that there's a turret in the shed on her deck it looks like both turrets are gone. All that's left of the aft turret is the non-rotating housing of the barrel.
 
Unless you can claim with certainty that there's a turret in the shed on her deck it looks like both turrets are gone. All that's left of the aft turret is the non-rotating housing of the barrel.

Oh, you're right. I mistakenly saw that as the turret itself. But you're correct that it is just the aft barrel enclosure. On second glance I see they have dropped in some sort of octagonal structure where the turret itself would have sat. (Or maybe that was under the turret originally? Hard to tell.)
 
Oh, you're right. I mistakenly saw that as the turret itself. But you're correct that it is just the aft barrel enclosure. On second glance I see they have dropped in some sort of octagonal structure where the turret itself would have sat. (Or maybe that was under the turret originally? Hard to tell.)
I honestly think it's just a temporary cover they slapped over the hole.
 
The hull's been repainted and she just been loaded in the drydock, so they've likely finished the major structural work.

Edit just remembered the tubes are going forward, so the aft gun's likely just going to be blanked off for now
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom