In what way? Late model F-16 has all the sensor goodies, AIM-9X, and AIM-120. (And, if someone wanted to pay for it, could add Meteor or AIM-120D.)
My original quote referred to someone suggesting that an upgraded F-16 can
largely outmatch a J-10c. And I said it's highly debatable that's true when it comes to air to air capabilities.
Now, before anyone goes any further, terms "largely", "outmatch", "highly debatable" and so on should be defined and agreed upon. Which, in my experience online, is not gonna happen. Different people will still stick to their definitions of various terms.
"Upgraded F-16" is also a stretchy term but basically, in my eyes, it was the best F-16 has to offer right now, in service. So a V model with AIM-120D. (not sure if any Vs are actually hanging D amraams off their wings, but the software has been upgraded to handle them, if I am not mistaken)
There is simply not enough data out there to say that radar on either plane is better. Or that missiles for either plane are better. Or that self protection suites are better. Which leads me to say that it's debatable to say that either F-16 or J-10 can
largely outmatch the other in air to air.
Of course, if someone defines "largely outmatch" as "eh, it can get a 10 % better kill rate" then that's on them. Personally, for me, "largely outmatch" means to be better by almost a generation, having like 20 years newer technology. And thus achieve lopsided results in air combat.
Which is why defining terms is crucial before going into any sort of discussion.
But perhaps discussions aren't wise to have here anyway, as it's a J-10 topic, not a plane vs plane topic. So moderators might not welcome such off topic posts.