lark said:Writing on the above pic. refers to Canadian Car & Foundry I see...
hesham said:lark said:Writing on the above pic. refers to Canadian Car & Foundry I see...
Yes my dear Lark,that's right,
and here is anther Mystery Burnelli aircraft Model,and I don't know if it was real design
or not ?.
http://mysteriousbill.weebly.com/bills-gaming-blog/burnellis-flying-wings
hesham said:here is a float designed by Burnelli,but what was this aircraft which fitted with ?.
Alcides said:Hehsam fantastic find!!! Any clue about the kind of plane is? Looks like a passanger transport plane.
Tailspin Turtle said:Proposed against USN OS-117, which was won by Grumman with what became the S2F.
hesham said:A big surprise;
I get this report about Burnelli,it contains the Projects; B-2000 as a six engined military/civil
transport and B-2000B bomber,also V-1000 conventional transport aircraft and B-1000 four
engined bomber,also the X-BAB-3 three seat high-speed light bomber.
hesham said:I get this report about Burnelli,it contains the Projects; B-2000 as a six engined military/civil
transport and B-2000B bomber,also V-1000 conventional transport aircraft and B-1000 four
engined bomber,also the X-BAB-3 three seat high-speed light bomber.
http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/pdf/td003.pdf
http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/xbab3.htm
hesham said:A big surprise;
I get this report about Burnelli,it contains the Projects; B-2000 as a six engined military/civil
transport and B-2000B bomber,also V-1000 conventional transport aircraft and B-1000 four
engined bomber,also the X-BAB-3 three seat high-speed light bomber.
Apteryx said:Wow… much greatness. That V-1000 is terribly mysterious. Looks like a Vickers design! Vickers V-1000… why does that sound familiar?
hesham said:Hi Apteryx,
the Burnelli V-1000 was mention in that site;
http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/td003.htm
hesham said:never saw like this design for Burnelli,Flugsport 1936
Skyblazer said:Thanks folks. This must have been an early configuration for what became the OA-1 Clyde Clipper. What kept me from thinking about the Clyde Clipper was the fact that the design lacked the characteristic canted tail fins that the OA-1 had. Also the designation "BR Mark II" was different.
I'm attaching a quick comparison of the BR Mark II profile, the cutaway profile the patent artwork, and the profile of the actual OA-1 Clyde Clipper as it was built. This will show the differences as well as the many similarities.
That looks like a model of a variant of the Burnelli CBY-3 Loadmaster.hesham said:What was this ?.
Jemiba said:Perhaps searching would be easier, if the source would be given ? :
Jemiba said:Ok, it's a pity.
Couldn't find it via reverse picture search, too, but the big two bladed props
and the big wheels make me think of a rubber band powered model ...