UPDATE: Get excited! NASA officials said in an update Tuesday that the next attempt to launch Artemis 1 will happen on Saturday, Sept. 3, from the Kennedy Space Center.
The launch window opens at 2:17 p.m.
Maybe because the weather will look better?UPDATE: Get excited! NASA officials said in an update Tuesday that the next attempt to launch Artemis 1 will happen on Saturday, Sept. 3, from the Kennedy Space Center.
The launch window opens at 2:17 p.m.
Saturday? I thought that it was going to be Friday. Oh well looks like I will have something to look forward to come the weekend, let’s see if the SLS can actually launch this time round.
View: https://twitter.com/chrisg_nsf/status/1564739028674662403Chris G tweet said:3/x: Management Team agreed to change loading procedure and start engine chilldown earlier. Work at pad to address LH2 leak purge can, and moved launch to SATURDAY, Sept. 3rd! OK... one extra day to launch.
6/x: They will open up the LH2 purge can, inspect, and re-torque and make a change to how things flow into the purge can.
View: https://twitter.com/spcplcyonline/status/1564739702518857728Mark Berger, weather officer: issue with lightning just before tanking. Thunderstorms threatened for one hour. Rest of tanking weather was quiet, but new storms moved westward and was no go at T-0. Also cleared all weather violations in the last 3rd of window.
Berger: weather on Sat favors showers and possibly a few thunderstorms but optimistic at least some clear air in the afternoon. Possibility of violation is pretty high though [I didn't hear him say what it is.]
Okayeee then. My bad.Weather is only 40% go for Saturday.
End of the briefing. Takeaway is that NASA is thinking the anomalous engine 3 temp may be a sensor issue: the way the sensor is behaving, Honeycutt said, doesn’t match the physics of the situation. Replacing the sensor now isn’t feasible, so developing flight rationale.
Apparently it was a faulty sensor causing the problems but it’s hard to replace it at the pad.
View: https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1564751273676705793
End of the briefing. Takeaway is that NASA is thinking the anomalous engine 3 temp may be a sensor issue: the way the sensor is behaving, Honeycutt said, doesn’t match the physics of the situation. Replacing the sensor now isn’t feasible, so developing flight rationale.
The usual stupid cartoonist who thinks he's funny.
Given humanity's track record, one can hardly blame them.l wonder if they'll try and get us to pay for it?The usual stupid cartoonist who thinks he's funny.
Weather is now 60% go for Saturday.
My cultural lag might show off as much as your network data rate... But who's the guy?!
Robert Lansing, who played Gary Seven in Star Trek TOS series 2, episode 26 Assignment: Earth.
Assignment: Earth - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Robert Lansing, who played Gary Seven in Star Trek TOS series 2, episode 26 Assignment: Earth.
Assignment: Earth - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This was supposed to be its own spin-off show at one point. Didn’t really pan out.
Why does nasa have such an affinity for hydrolox engines. They are a pain to work with as far as I know.
Chatting with Aerojet Rocketdyne folks here at the NASA KSC press site, they are "100%" certain the problem is the sensor, which is on the core stage side of the interface between the hydrogen tank and the engine.
View: https://twitter.com/spcplcyonline/status/1565452010568253442
Chatting with Aerojet Rocketdyne folks here at the NASA KSC press site, they are "100%" certain the problem is the sensor, which is on the core stage side of the interface between the hydrogen tank and the engine.
View: https://twitter.com/spcplcyonline/status/1565452010568253442
Chatting with Aerojet Rocketdyne folks here at the NASA KSC press site, they are "100%" certain the problem is the sensor, which is on the core stage side of the interface between the hydrogen tank and the engine.
So what are the chances that the SLS will lift off as scheduled on Saturday if the sensor is still playing up? I thought that NASA would have to de-fuel the rocket so that they can fix the sensor.
Launch weather officer Melody Lovin says weather should trend better through the 2-hour launch window: 60% go at the start to 80% at the end.
For backup day Monday 70% go, but a little more uncertainty.
View: https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1565689261550190593She adds there could be showers around the time taking starts, but difficult to predict. Any delays in tanking is not necessarily a minute-for-minute launch delay, says Jeremy Parsons, deputy manager of exploration ground systems.
SLS/Artemis 1: 1st and 2nd stage tanks should be topped off and in replenish mode by 12:07pm with a final 30m hold at the L-minus 10-minute point starting at 1:37pm; assuming management concurrence, the count should resume at 2:07pm for a launch at 2:17pm
The US Congress mandated that SLS use this architecture.Why does nasa have such an affinity for hydrolox engines. They are a pain to work with as far as I know.
Better specific impulse...lighter....lends itself to NTRs...water vapor exhaust. Well worth it.Why does nasa have such an affinity for hydrolox engines. They are a pain to work with as far as I know.
The energy density is so low that the tank will have to be huge in volume. Also liquid hydrogen is very difficult to handle.Better specific impulse...lighter....lends itself to NTRs...water vapor exhaust. Well worth it.Why does nasa have such an affinity for hydrolox engines. They are a pain to work with as far as I know.
I just wish Musk wasn't so afraid of it. It may just be a sensor glitch---like on my car recently.
The huge volume is a plus if you go wet workshop.
That's why RP-1 is a more appropriate fuel for a first-stage and a major factor why the Saturn 5's S-IC used RP-1 instead of LH2.The energy density is so low that the tank will have to be huge in volume. Also liquid hydrogen is very difficult to handle.
A modernised f-1 would be better than the rs-25 clusterThat's why RP-1 is a more appropriate fuel for a first-stage and a major factor why the Saturn 5's S-IC used RP-1 instead of LH2.The energy density is so low that the tank will have to be huge in volume. Also liquid hydrogen is very difficult to handle.