@Tomboy your response to this post is conjecture of the wildest kind from the flimsiest evidence, and deeply premature. Refrain from such posts or be banned from this topic.
There have been a lot of worse conjectures than the three that were quoted by Tomboy. Let's look though the three claims:
(1) The claim about stealth is highly speculative. The overall layout of the design combines a number of well known stealth features along with a tailless planform and thus outwardly appears to be making more aerodynamic compromises for stealth than even the F-22. However, stealth is complex, the design of the internal structure matters and the role of RAM is important. So, it may well be less stealthy than designs which make a lot less sacrifices for stealth. This claim about stealth is probably the least defensible. (Furthermore, as signatures vary by wavelength and angle the ability to rank aircraft in terms of stealth itself is questionable).
(2) The nose has ample space for antenna area and cooling. Furthermore, the existence of a third engine suggests at least 50% more power than the J-20 (and with WS-15 rumoured to have substantially increased power generators that could eventually be significant). The efficiency of Chinese radars isn't known, but they do have substantial gallium reserves so a GaN AESA can't be ruled out either. Of course, we don't know - but the overall design suggests potential for an unusually powerful radar.
(3) Given the aircraft's size and the length of the "bays" seemingly being sized to carry PL-17 internally - it arguably has the longest internal bays of any fighter aircraft. The total volume depends on depth, which we do not know. However, given the size of the aircraft it isn't unreasonable to think that the aircraft will have a larger payload (with the question being how it is distributed between fuel and armaments) than most existing fighters.
I'm very much for evidencing claims, and making sure speculations are clearly marked as speculations - but overall, two of these claims are relatively well supported by the evidence - and compared to a lot of other claims, seem more grounded than most.
Edit: I may be confused - is the goal to remove all speculation from this thread to the bar? If so, there is a lot (essentially everything other than the photos themselves)... I'm confused.
