- Joined
- 21 January 2015
- Messages
- 11,590
- Reaction score
- 14,866
I’ve seen it suggested that the X-37 maybe in a Molyniya type orbit which would be hard for amateur observers to track.
Had to go look that up, even with as much as I like space stuff it was a thing I did not know.a Molyniya type orbit
The Molniya orbit combines high inclination (63.4°) with high eccentricity (0.722) to maximize viewing time over high latitudes. Each orbit lasts 12 hours, so the slow, high-altitude portion of the orbit repeats over the same location every day and night. Russian communications satellites and the Sirius radio satellites currently use this type of orbit. (Adapted from Fundamentals of Space Systems by Vincent L. Pisacane, 2005.)
Not really. What Hall thrusters? That was just a test on a previous mission. Also, they would be too weak for setting up and ending dip into the atmosphere.I think that the ellipsoidal orbit is more about maneuvering in the fast portion of it.
You need that kind of of trajectory to get low enough to use aerodynamics effects.
The slow portion give more time for Hall thrusters to alter the trajectory.
In effect, the heterogeneous characteristics of the X-37 are maximized that way.
The US uses Molniya orbit too. There is no equivlent to the GEO belt for MolniyaSo the X-37B is in Molniya orbit ? what it does here is anybody guess. I would hazard that Molniya orbit are a soviet / russian thing. Which brings THE question:
What kind of assets do the russians have in Molniya orbit that would be worth the X-37B "interacting" with them ?
Molniya (satellite) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
By the way the Soviets have satellites spying the GEO belt comsats: so maybe the X-37B is doing something similar with russian comsats, which have often been in Molniya orbit for geographical reasons (makes more sense for Russia being a giant country north of the equator)
Nobody mentioned firing the thruster in the atmosphere but during coast-up and down leg from the apogee.Not really. What Hall thrusters? That was just a test on a previous mission. Also, they would be too weak for setting up and ending dip into the atmosphere.
Anyways, the X-37 needs to have its payload bay open and its solar array deployed. These are not meant for repeat operations on orbit. it can only operate for a limited time with payload bay closed.
So the X-37B is in Molniya orbit ?
Neither did I. To dip in the atmosphere at perigee requires a delta V at apogee, not during the "legs" before and after. A Hall thruster is too weak for this.Nobody mentioned firing the thruster in the atmosphere but during coast-up and down leg from the apogee.
and at 63 degreesI think a true Molniya orbit maintains an apogee over a specific geographic location.
wrong, that is not how orbital mechanics work. Delta V affects an orbit at point 180 degrees from the point of application. To raise and lower the orbit into the atmosphere at perigee requires the delta V be applied at apogee. Once the orbit is lowered into the atmosphere, braking will occur and the apogee will be lowered.We are not requiring a Voddoo like 50ft fly by
The delta E gained extending the leg up and increasing the speed down (yes, elevating the Apogee) can be traded for skiming the high layer of the atmosphere and use the delta V to change the orbit.
That's it. I am not suggesting any amplitude here. It's only basic physics
Question: does the X-37 have enough fuel to recover from a GTO? I would think a huge amount of breaking would be necessary to slow to a survivable re-entry speed. Is the vehicle counting on atmospheric drag at perigee over time to allow it to recover? Is it possibly being expended?
noUpper stage still attached? Perhaps with hypergolics instead?
So interestingX-37B OTV-7 to aerobreak.
Homepage
Welcome to The War Zone. We cover the air, sea, land, space & cyber domains of warfare & wrap it all up in a geopolitical bow. We take the world's most complex & opaque technological topics & convey them in a way that anyone can understand.www.twz.com
In the meantime, just what we know about the X-37B OTV-7 mission, including the newly disclosed planned aerobraking maneuvers and the previously announced novel high elliptical orbit, continues to be especially interesting in of itself.
A. It is regularly done with Mars orbiters and could be done* with any spacecraft that has propulsion capability.I do wonder if Starship might be capable of the same some day.
A. It is regularly done with Mars orbiters and could be done* with any spacecraft that has propulsion capability.
B. Starship is an entry vehicle. It already uses drag and lift to adjust its path during entry.
* only orbital altitude changes. Inclination changes require the ability to produce lift.
No, X-37 and Starship are different in this regard. X-37 generates lift and this is used to change inclination. Starship does not create lift.Fair enough. In my mind the military significance would aerobreaking to change inclination, which requires more air and control surfaces to achieve. X-37 and Starship would be unique in that regard. It seems like the USAF may be attempting this, though we shall see.