Western Artists' Concepts of Soviet aircraft during the Cold War

I believe the so-called "Tu-200" was a completely bogus Tupolev project resulting from misinterpretation of Soviet information by the West.
 
Thansk a lot. Who made up this sinful project? ;D


TuG-75 source : Flying Magazine December 1951
 

Attachments

  • 14-1-680x243.jpg
    14-1-680x243.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 220
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 157
  • 4 (1).jpg
    4 (1).jpg
    285.9 KB · Views: 133
  • 4 (2).jpg
    4 (2).jpg
    242.6 KB · Views: 120
  • TuG-75_explanation_2.jpg
    TuG-75_explanation_2.jpg
    280.8 KB · Views: 172
  • TuG-75.jpg
    TuG-75.jpg
    140.4 KB · Views: 180
  • TuG-75_explanation.jpg
    TuG-75_explanation.jpg
    142.9 KB · Views: 143
  • TuG-75.png
    TuG-75.png
    301.6 KB · Views: 163
  • 00f4af40-40cd-0130-a8e7-0050569446fe.jpg
    00f4af40-40cd-0130-a8e7-0050569446fe.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 195
Hi,

the MiG-25 & MiG-23 from 1967,an artist drawings.

Советские самолеты А.С.Яковлев 1979
 

Attachments

  • 2-2.png
    2-2.png
    169.4 KB · Views: 646
  • 2.png
    2.png
    230.6 KB · Views: 677
  • 1.png
    1.png
    258.6 KB · Views: 709
These are not 'artist drawings', but heavily retouched photos from Domodedovo air parade.
 
...
 

Attachments

  • MiG-29 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    MiG-29 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    434.8 KB · Views: 729
  • MiG-31 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    MiG-31 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    586.7 KB · Views: 309
  • Su-27 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    Su-27 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    430.1 KB · Views: 296
  • Tu-160 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    Tu-160 Pilot Press 1986.jpg
    438 KB · Views: 326
I was fumbling around at lunch today and came across this post. Every time a see reference to tis supposed project, I think of the Chinese J-9.

PaulMM (Overscan) said:
Service testing of a new single seat single engine fighter with double delta (a la Viggen) wing, closely resembling the "Faithless", intended as the MiG-21 successor.

Air International October 1974
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    627.9 KB · Views: 385
There is a pic of a model of this 3-view in another thread on the MiG-31, IIRC, here on SPF.
 

Attachments

  • Swing_Wing_Mysterious_Soviet_Fighter.png
    Swing_Wing_Mysterious_Soviet_Fighter.png
    218.2 KB · Views: 435

Attachments

  • 8.png
    8.png
    755.1 KB · Views: 259
  • 7.png
    7.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 196
  • 6.png
    6.png
    585.8 KB · Views: 187
  • 5.png
    5.png
    805.5 KB · Views: 182
  • 4.png
    4.png
    596.6 KB · Views: 167
  • 3.png
    3.png
    915.2 KB · Views: 156
  • 2.png
    2.png
    661.6 KB · Views: 193
  • 1.png
    1.png
    918 KB · Views: 210
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • 8.png
    8.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 181
  • 7.png
    7.png
    981.5 KB · Views: 176
  • 6.png
    6.png
    513.2 KB · Views: 171
  • 5.png
    5.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 866
  • 4.png
    4.png
    438.8 KB · Views: 914
  • 3.png
    3.png
    854.6 KB · Views: 1,005
  • 2.png
    2.png
    340.3 KB · Views: 1,021
  • 1.png
    1.png
    421 KB · Views: 1,077
Last edited by a moderator:
From JAWA 1985.
 

Attachments

  • 56.png
    56.png
    45.9 KB · Views: 381
  • 55.png
    55.png
    48.1 KB · Views: 272
Better quality pictures to supplement Reply #151 of this topic:

Spread from 1955' issue of Air Trails magazine (source http://www.airplanesandrockets.com/magazines/air-trails/air-progress-soviet-air-force-mar-1955-air-trails.htm), drawings by Douglas Rolfe.

Looking on the represented types, I wonder, how it's possible to draw them so inaccurate: Jak-23 didn't have any visible airscoop in front, MiG-15bis have two engines etc?

This has been just popular magazine of youngsters, as far as I understand. But did another, more professional books or magazines of this period, similarly incorrect?

Anyway, Doug Rolfe drawings have been a good example of style - both aircraft and cars. Just check http://www.airplanesandrockets.com/index.htm - "Vintage magazines" section
 

Attachments

  • soviet-air-force-march-1955-air-trails-1500x1011.jpg
    soviet-air-force-march-1955-air-trails-1500x1011.jpg
    534.6 KB · Views: 429
Found at whatifmodelers. I don't know if these were serious artist concepts of supersonic Soviet bombers or not. Originated from Avpro(?)
 

Attachments

  • AvproRussianBomber1.jpg
    AvproRussianBomber1.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 381
  • AvproRussianBomber2.jpg
    AvproRussianBomber2.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 376
I believe they were Myasishchev M-20 studies, part of the evolution that lead to the Tu-160.
Not really sure why Avpro drew these, or what their aim was in general!
 
Hood said:
I believe they were Myasishchev M-20 studies, part of the evolution that lead to the Tu-160.
Not really sure why Avpro drew these, or what their aim was in general!
Yes, this is one of M-20 variants.
 

Attachments

  • m20_09_3.jpg
    m20_09_3.jpg
    88.6 KB · Views: 284
flateric said:
Yes, this is one M-20 variants.

Curiously, Google search-by-image immediately suggest, that this is M-20.
There have been plenty of projects' versions: https://testpilot.ru/russia/myasishchev/m/20/m20_1.htm
 
an interesting design, not one I recall seeing previously, do you know if it had any basis in reality or merely a speculative exercise assuming a Soviet X.15 equivalent ?

cheers, Joe
 
A twin fuselage missile launcher aircraft.

Source: Oltre il Cielo 1959 01
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    327.8 KB · Views: 676
  • 1.png
    1.png
    449.6 KB · Views: 722
Last edited by a moderator:
Source: Oltre il Cielo 1959 05
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    590.1 KB · Views: 611
Last edited by a moderator:
From Cielo 1953 12
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    452.9 KB · Views: 493
  • 2.png
    2.png
    508.2 KB · Views: 441
From Ali Nouva 2/1952.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    509.9 KB · Views: 177
  • 2.png
    2.png
    593.8 KB · Views: 185
From Aero Journal 6-7/1999,
 

Attachments

  • 3.png
    3.png
    382.3 KB · Views: 160
  • 2.png
    2.png
    558.9 KB · Views: 139
  • 1.png
    1.png
    330.8 KB · Views: 167
John Forbat's, TSR2 precision attack to Tornado, has an interesting Vickers design for a possible Soviet M3 bomber with stand off missiles ! hmm are there any other examples of such 'official' future planning adversary designs ? the GD. Mig2000 comes to mind ?
 
Last edited:
I love this thread! Congratulations to everyone who has contributed to it for so long. But, how about the other way around? Is there such a thing as eastern artists' concepts of American (or NATO) aircraft during the Cold War? I suppose so, but how much of it ended up being available to the general public after the end of the Cold War, is what I wonder.
 
Easterners knew the Western aircraft thanks to the same source Westerners knew the Eastern aircraft (and often Easterners knew Eastern aircraft). Jane's. Seriously, magazines like Letectví + Kosmonautika often sourced articles about new Soviet projects directly from Jane's and similar publications. While L+K published a lot of concepts of Western aircraft, it was almost always copied from some Western source. I saw several articles where L+K used only NATO code for some Soviet aircraft, because they didn't have better sources than Western publications. West was simply much more open.
 
Back
Top Bottom