Western Artists' Concepts of Soviet aircraft during the Cold War

Hi,


here is the Antonov An-400 3-view.
 

Attachments

  • An-400.png
    An-400.png
    686 KB · Views: 276
Hi,


here is a very closely drawing to actually built Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker.
 

Attachments

  • Su-27  II.png
    Su-27 II.png
    675.9 KB · Views: 427
  • Su-27.png
    Su-27.png
    381.5 KB · Views: 432
From Air International 7/1986,


here is the early imagination to Mil Mi-28 and Kamov Ka-50 3-views.
 

Attachments

  • Mi-28.png
    Mi-28.png
    375.5 KB · Views: 384
  • Ka-50.png
    Ka-50.png
    544.2 KB · Views: 392
hesham said:
here is the Antonov An-400 3-view.

"An-400" was simply the designation quoted for what was actually the An-124.
 

Attachments

  • $_57.JPG
    $_57.JPG
    161.5 KB · Views: 412
If we read the back of the photo on the auction, the top is supposed to be the twin engined MiG-17 successor to the MiG-15, the middle is an all-weather twin jet fighter, and the bottom is the MiG-19 "Flying Barrel".


Its dated 16 Feb 1953.


Strangely, the top design is quite similar to the I-320 prototype of 1949. Bottom seems to be a Ta-183. Middle is kind of a Yak-25, but 2 years before it was shown to the West.
 

Attachments

  • $_57 (1).jpg
    $_57 (1).jpg
    130.2 KB · Views: 301
Last edited:
from Aerei d'Oltre Cortina, Roma, 1955
 

Attachments

  • mig 19.jpg
    mig 19.jpg
    136.2 KB · Views: 1,511
That's an excellent link to the Ta-183 based fighter shown in the e-bay item on the previous page from 1953.
It shows this misinformation stuck around for at least two years with the same MiG-19 designation. Odd to see the Ta-183 as the MiG-19, when for years it was said the Ta-183 was "copied" to produce the MiG-15!
 
hesham said:
famvburg said:
MiG-15, -17 and -19 from a current eBay auction. The two single engine jets look like the two common early misconceptions but the twin looks like one of the Yak twins or maybe an Alexiev(?) design IMHO.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/400685460452?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT


Great find Famvburg,and we can put them here;


And from Popular Mechanics;


http://books.google.com.eg/books?id...Ag#v=onepage&q=popular mechanics 1955&f=false
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    645.9 KB · Views: 1,271
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • R-8.png
    R-8.png
    773.6 KB · Views: 309
  • R-7.png
    R-7.png
    355.6 KB · Views: 276
  • R-6.png
    R-6.png
    523.2 KB · Views: 279
  • R-5.png
    R-5.png
    482.3 KB · Views: 289
  • R-4.png
    R-4.png
    570 KB · Views: 316
  • R-3.png
    R-3.png
    807.8 KB · Views: 864
  • R-2.png
    R-2.png
    603.8 KB · Views: 943
  • R-1.png
    R-1.png
    615.8 KB · Views: 1,064
Last edited by a moderator:
Three more images I received from "famvburg" ...
 

Attachments

  • AW&ST - MiG-29 xs.jpg
    AW&ST - MiG-29 xs.jpg
    638.5 KB · Views: 463
  • AW&ST - Su-27 + Tu-160 xs.jpg
    AW&ST - Su-27 + Tu-160 xs.jpg
    575.4 KB · Views: 438
  • AW&ST - MiG-31 xs.jpg
    AW&ST - MiG-31 xs.jpg
    549.5 KB · Views: 462
Those drawings are remarkably correct, at least with regards to the plan views, so they probably
were made using satellite imagery, I think.
 
Jemiba said:
Those drawings are remarkably correct, at least with regards to the plan views, so they probably
were made using satellite imagery, I think.


IIRC, some of the overheads were published in the open literature in the 80s.
 
From 64 years (!) ago. Saw this on Facebook somewhere and then found a copy on eBay. Thanks to Deino for explaining to me how to reduce the sizes of images! I had no idea it is so simple! I think the only design they got correct was the MiG-9.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0007 (448x640).jpg
    IMG_0007 (448x640).jpg
    199.5 KB · Views: 271
  • IMG_0006 (491x640).jpg
    IMG_0006 (491x640).jpg
    247.5 KB · Views: 232
  • IMG_0005 (457x640).jpg
    IMG_0005 (457x640).jpg
    205.5 KB · Views: 295
  • IMG_0004 (418x640).jpg
    IMG_0004 (418x640).jpg
    211.9 KB · Views: 290
  • IMG_0003 (450x640).jpg
    IMG_0003 (450x640).jpg
    190 KB · Views: 290
  • IMG_0002 (489x640).jpg
    IMG_0002 (489x640).jpg
    224.1 KB · Views: 301
  • IMG_0001 (455x640).jpg
    IMG_0001 (455x640).jpg
    251.1 KB · Views: 334
From AW&ST, Feb. 19, 1979, an overhead drawing of a Tu-144D - based bomber.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0001 (447x640).jpg
    IMG_0001 (447x640).jpg
    182.3 KB · Views: 280
From AW&ST Feb. 19, 1979, an artist concept of the Super Foxbat, to be later known as the MiG-31 Foxhound.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0002 (471x640).jpg
    IMG_0002 (471x640).jpg
    263.6 KB · Views: 1,187
Great find RAP,


but I am also can't ID it,if it was a variant of MiG aircraft 518,the cockpit is different,and if it was a
variant of Sukhoi T10,the spine is different ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    261.2 KB · Views: 277
Unfortunately I don't know anything about this model or what aircraft it is supposed to represent. I checked Ebay today and it has sold along with the other models so unfortunately I can provide pictures of the other ones for comparison. I should have at least copied the photos. I glad you caught this one. Oh well, live and learn.
 
I contacted the seller to see if he could provide more info on the models. He said these were produced in the early early 1980's by Al Parker. Parker worked for Hughes in their model shop and also produced patterns and models to the aircraft industry. He was also involved with a company called Marketing Aids (out of business) that manufactured factory models for the aviation industry. I think there was a book back in the 1980s called Soviet Warplanes. They had some artist concepts of what the next generation of Soviet aircraft would look like. These models seem similar to what was in that book if I recall correctly.
 
Hi,


here is a Super-MiG fighter Model and Drawing,I never know they made a Model for it.


Flying Review 1964-03
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    200.2 KB · Views: 1,076
  • 2.png
    2.png
    133.8 KB · Views: 1,068
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi,


here is a hypothetical drawing to Soviet Ram-L and Tupolev Tu-22M.


Flygvapennytt 4-1971 & 2-1980
 

Attachments

  • L   2-1980.png
    L 2-1980.png
    36.1 KB · Views: 460
  • Soviet   4-1971.png
    Soviet 4-1971.png
    357.8 KB · Views: 440
It looks like the front and rear wings share a pivot point. Can you imagine the weight of those things? You're going to head way into a diminishing returns curve.
 
This what i have....
But it seemd that this jet apsolutely fake...
 

Attachments

  • airtrail3.jpg
    airtrail3.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 328
Vladimir said:
This what i have....
But it seemd that this jet apsolutely fake...

This looks a lot like one of those old Lindberg or Aurora 1:48 scale models my dad used to have. Completely inaccurate but nice!
 
Hi! Tu-200.
We can see some tail horizontal stabilizer position in these drawings.
 

Attachments

  • tu-200-07-680x190.jpg
    tu-200-07-680x190.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 1,373
  • Tupolev_Tu-200.jpg
    Tupolev_Tu-200.jpg
    57.3 KB · Views: 1,372
  • tu-200-01-680x502.jpg
    tu-200-01-680x502.jpg
    60.5 KB · Views: 1,392
  • tu-200-02-680x962.jpg
    tu-200-02-680x962.jpg
    82.6 KB · Views: 1,421
  • tu-200-03.jpg
    tu-200-03.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 1,415
Back
Top Bottom