I have received this book today. And I found out immediately that this is a frightful book. I'm thankful that I met this book. I enjoy myself carefully. I show maximum respect for author's extreme effort on this book and the wonderful ability. B)Schneiderman said:Ah, well, I have a good source of information
http://fonthillmedia.com/Schneider-Trophy
blackkite said:I have received this book today. And I found out immediately that this is a frightful book.Schneiderman said:Ah, well, I have a good source of information
http://fonthillmedia.com/Schneider-Trophy
Schneiderman said:No problem I understand what you mean . It is part of the fun of these forums that we talk with people from so many countries who do not have English as their first language and I congratulate them all on their efforts. I think that you are Japanese, which makes writing in English very difficult for you and you do very well.
Thank you for your kind comments about my book
Thanks you very much my professor and my dear hesham-san for your gentle words.Schneiderman said:No problem I understand what you mean . It is part of the fun of these forums that we talk with people from so many countries who do not have English as their first language and I congratulate them all on their efforts. I think that you are Japanese, which makes writing in English very difficult for you and you do very well.
Thank you for your kind comments about my book
Sorry Hesham but you are confusing two discussions, my reply was to Blackkitehesham said:No,I don't mean that at all,
it's not the language,the topic become a random more and more,no specific subject,so I
hope to re-organized it.
Schneiderman said:On your subject, if you title a thread 'Various Italian Aircraft' then you cannot be surprised if the discussion covers many different types of Italian aircraft, can you? If you wanted to limit it to specific projects and aircraft then you should have chosen a better title.
I found excellet SIAI Savoia S51 three side view drawing in page 89. What a delicate and a beautiful drawing it is!!Schneiderman said:2) There are no official drawings of the S51 and the exact dimensions are uncertain. There are only a few poor quality photographs. All 3-views drawings are best-guess
3) This is one attempt to produce a good drawing of the S51 using a model (which may possibly have been based on the S51) shown in a 1934 paper from l'Aerotechica, translated by NACA, and a photograph
Thanks a lot. Ummm....Ca.66.Apophenia said:Judging by engines and tailplane, I'd say it represents the first prototype Ca.66. Not sure about that nose glazing though ...
blackkite said:How about Ca.87? Also horizontal tail stabilizer was biplane!
How about Fiat CMASA MF4 seaplane? Little early?hesham said:Hi,
in 1933,Italian Air Ministry issued a competition for a long-range maritime recce seaplane,
which led to develop CRDA Z-501,what was the tenders ?.