Various Bell tilt-rotor projects

Further to the artwork of the camo XV-15 posted above, let me present you with two pics of the XV-15 during service evaluations. The first pic shows Bell XV-15 (mfr 024615) during shipboard suitability trials on board USS Tripoli (LHD 10). The second shows Army demonstration flights when the XV-15 was indeed painted in a camo scheme. Both pics sourced from SDASM.
49048931918_c7d24f3e6d_o (1).jpg 49049432936_5e59286770_o.jpg
 
Can anyone ID this TR? its probably an early Bell design, although the pusher props confused me. Any ideas?

Of course this cannot be a pusher prop concept because it would fly backwards when rotors are tilted down. I assume the rotors are stowed streamlined in the rear facing pods.
 
Hi,

was this a Bell D-262 or not ?.
 

Attachments

  • ceca0ee5f24928c21da95ae49262d680.jpg
    ceca0ee5f24928c21da95ae49262d680.jpg
    92.4 KB · Views: 112
From this report of 1983.
 

Attachments

  • 0.png
    0.png
    39.8 KB · Views: 99
  • 1.png
    1.png
    147 KB · Views: 90
  • 2.png
    2.png
    53.8 KB · Views: 99
  • 3.png
    3.png
    294.3 KB · Views: 165
Further to the artwork of the camo XV-15 posted above, let me present you with two pics of the XV-15 during service evaluations. The first pic shows Bell XV-15 (mfr 024615) during shipboard suitability trials on board USS Tripoli (LHD 10). The second shows Army demonstration flights when the XV-15 was indeed painted in a camo scheme. Both pics sourced from SDASM.
View attachment 636584 View attachment 636585
Trivia: The LHD trials were scheduled for the same west coast trip as the demonstration to the Army at Fort Huachuca, AZ. We wanted to present the XV-15, which at that point was in the overall white with blue trim NASA scheme, to each service in its own color scheme. We therefore repainted the airplane in the gray Navy scheme and then repainted it again with tan and brown water-soluble paint for the first demo, which was to the Army. One wash-rack visit later, it was on the LHD in a Navy-appropriate color scheme.
 
Somewhere in a box I have a VHS tape (probably useless now) of the XV-15 doing nap of the earth work I think in Texas. Being a Cobra guy the acceleration and maneuvers were amazing to me. As mentioned earlier it was heady stuff back then for a junior birdman with visions of low level "derry-do". Troy Gaffey smiled and patted me on the head at Quad A as I regaled him with how great a pilot I was going to be in one of those.
 
As attractive and capable as the XV-15 was (and I have first-hand experience flying it), it was only going to transition from demonstration to production because there was 1) enough confidence in the concept and 2) a pressing replacement requirement. The XV-15 fulfilled the first (supporters who flew it became zealots; skeptics who flew it became supporters); however, the only near-term replacement opportunity with any prospect of being funded was the USMC’s CH-46, a medium helicopter, not any of the potential applications in the XV-15’s size class. The Bell Helicopter marketing team (over the strident objections of Bell engineering) therefor proposed a tilt rotor for the Navy’s VSTOL A program, which had been created to take advantage of the lift-fan concept and included the CH-46 replacement as part of its raison d’etre, along with the E-2, S-3, and C-2. After the Navy VSTOL Program Office realized the lift fan wasn’t ready for prime time and was unwilling to consider a tilt rotor for the fixed-wing replacement requirements, Charlie Crawford of the Army’s Aviation System Command created a program (JVX) combining Army, Air Force, and USMC rotary-wing requirements to replace medium helicopters and some fixed-wing Army reconnaissance airplanes. Meanwhile, the Marine Corps had become enamored with the tiltrotor’s speed and range compared to a helicopter as a CH-46 replacement, in part as a result of some of their aviators flying the XV-15; as a result, JVX fell by the wayside and the Navy created the V-22 program to replace the CH-46 and to my great surprise recently, the C-2.
 
As attractive and capable as the XV-15 was (and I have first-hand experience flying it), it was only going to transition from demonstration to production because there was 1) enough confidence in the concept and 2) a pressing replacement requirement. The XV-15 fulfilled the first (supporters who flew it became zealots; skeptics who flew it became supporters); however, the only near-term replacement opportunity with any prospect of being funded was the USMC’s CH-46, a medium helicopter, not any of the potential applications in the XV-15’s size class. The Bell Helicopter marketing team (over the strident objections of Bell engineering) therefor proposed a tilt rotor for the Navy’s VSTOL A program, which had been created to take advantage of the lift-fan concept and included the CH-46 replacement as part of its raison d’etre, along with the E-2, S-3, and C-2. After the Navy VSTOL Program Office realized the lift fan wasn’t ready for prime time and was unwilling to consider a tilt rotor for the fixed-wing replacement requirements, Charlie Crawford of the Army’s Aviation System Command created a program (JVX) combining Army, Air Force, and USMC rotary-wing requirements to replace medium helicopters and some fixed-wing Army reconnaissance airplanes. Meanwhile, the Marine Corps had become enamored with the tiltrotor’s speed and range compared to a helicopter as a CH-46 replacement, in part as a result of some of their aviators flying the XV-15; as a result, JVX fell by the wayside and the Navy created the V-22 program to replace the CH-46 and to my great surprise recently, the C-2.
Thank you! Excellent summation of how we got to where we are today.
 
There are numerous bits and pieces of Aviation history languishing in the varied yards at Ames. I discovered one of the wind tunnel models for one the USAF stealth transports efforts peaking out from under a rather large tarp over by the wind tunnel.
 
I imagine a larger concept might have two wings…forward two rotors tractor—back two look like pushers—but are tractors just on the back end of the nacelles and mounted higher..both sets rotate—-good clearance?
 
From Aviation magazine 1981,

please have a look,and tell me what is so weird in picture # 1 ?!.
 

Attachments

  • 6.png
    6.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 142
  • 5.png
    5.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 135
  • 4.png
    4.png
    780.5 KB · Views: 140
  • 3.png
    3.png
    416.3 KB · Views: 140
  • 2.png
    2.png
    507.4 KB · Views: 171
  • 1.png
    1.png
    484.5 KB · Views: 187
Is that a missile ladder with 8(?) Mavericks or Hellifires on the 5th image?

If so that is the most interesting missile storage launcher on an aircraft I have ever see.
 
From Aviation magazine 1987.
 

Attachments

  • 9.png
    9.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 105

Attachments

  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_01.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_01.jpg
    160.8 KB · Views: 100
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_02.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_02.jpg
    122.1 KB · Views: 89
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_03.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_03.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 77
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_04.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_04.jpg
    131 KB · Views: 86
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_05.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_05.jpg
    109.8 KB · Views: 103
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_06.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_06.jpg
    128.2 KB · Views: 107
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_07.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_07.jpg
    90.4 KB · Views: 111
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_08.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_08.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 106
  • metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_09.jpg
    metadc1831659_xl_UNTA_AR0836-125-25-001_09.jpg
    94.8 KB · Views: 110

Attachments

  • Gunship Derivative Tiltroror.pdf
    1 MB · Views: 43
From Army Aviation Digest 1966.
 

Attachments

  • 56.png
    56.png
    224.1 KB · Views: 105

Attachments

  • 11.png
    11.png
    349.2 KB · Views: 62
  • 9.png
    9.png
    43 KB · Views: 67
From NASA report 19720022363,

the D-270 and D-272.
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    382.3 KB · Views: 47
  • 22.png
    22.png
    593.1 KB · Views: 45
  • 23.png
    23.png
    740 KB · Views: 40
  • 24.png
    24.png
    342.2 KB · Views: 28
  • 25.png
    25.png
    437.3 KB · Views: 25
  • 26.png
    26.png
    377.2 KB · Views: 39
From Army Aviation 1975/11-12.
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    421.1 KB · Views: 36
The Tactical Tilt Rotor (TTR) competition of the late 1980s became the LHX competition along the way.
Interestingly, Bell's design was first labeled as a "Bell-Boeing" under the initial TTR program in 1989, then became a "McDonnell Douglas-Bell Textron" under LHX in 1990. They even used the same artwork (remember that MDD was NOT part of Boeing at the time, they were still a separate entity).
 

Attachments

  • TTR 1.jpg
    TTR 1.jpg
    474.3 KB · Views: 58
  • TTR 2.jpg
    TTR 2.jpg
    320.3 KB · Views: 56
  • TTR 3.jpg
    TTR 3.jpg
    353.8 KB · Views: 63
Well, the Marines just use AIM-9 for A2A, and would probably do so on a Tilt-Rotor gunship. An interesitng concept had theS-67 gone into service was to mount 10-12 AIM-9s. It would function as a difficult-to-detect very mobile SAM site.
That would have been wild!

"How'd you make Ace?"
"Shot down 3 Hinds and 2 Havocs in about 3 minutes..." :D
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom