LowObservable said:It does until you push the switch labeled CANARD RETRACT/DEPLOY.
If you will read a patent, you will notice, that canard for this family of aircraft (including transport, tanker and bomber) was only intended for transport version.blackkite said:Hmmm......
Canard increase RCS?
We already know that Canard is sensitive, hard to control.
Skunk Worksblackkite said:Oh we get two opinions!!
flateric thanks a lot. What is SW?
Airplane said:As for the thinking that they are going to just reproduce a modern variant of the B-2 is just silly. NG did not take it's lessons learned from the B2, and ignore them in order to roll out a B-2 clone; they also did not throw out the advances made in materials and construction technology. Likewise, they also did not incorporate the advances in materials and construction tech just to build 1:1 clone of the B-2. The B-2 ain't the perfect bomber.
Most likely you haven't read the patent at all...Airplane said:Most likely the intended vehicle is a drone, indicative of a USN application. Just because it shows a windscreen in a scale that indicates a large aircraft, that means nothing.
As for the thinking that they are going to just reproduce a modern variant of the B-2 is just silly. NG did not take it's lessons learned from the B2, and ignore them in order to roll out a B-2 clone; they also did not throw out the advances made in materials and construction technology. Likewise, they also did not incorporate the advances in materials and construction tech just to build 1:1 clone of the B-2. The B-2 ain't the perfect bomber.
LowObservable said:It does until you push the switch labeled CANARD RETRACT/DEPLOY.
George Allegrezza said:Wait to get the canards I have to get the 21-inch rims too? Is this from Northrop or BMW?
Sundog said:George Allegrezza said:Wait to get the canards I have to get the 21-inch rims too? Is this from Northrop or BMW?
It also comes with a T-Top, but it can only be used once.
It'll have a 10-passenger cabin with windows so that U.S. taxpayers can see it in action - to see if they're getting their money's worth. -SPsferrin said:Sundog said:George Allegrezza said:Wait to get the canards I have to get the 21-inch rims too? Is this from Northrop or BMW?
It also comes with a T-Top, but it can only be used once.
It comes with a sun roof you heathen. This isn't aCameroF-111.
flateric said:Most likely you haven't read the patent at all...Airplane said:Most likely the intended vehicle is a drone, indicative of a USN application.
True but it's not the US Navy looking for a NGB. The canards are most likely for low-level penetration purposes to help alleviate turbulence. -SPmarauder2048 said:flateric said:Most likely you haven't read the patent at all...Airplane said:Most likely the intended vehicle is a drone, indicative of a USN application.
The patent includes an active control flow system to modulate bleed (or aux pump) air over the canards and other control surfaces. In other words, blown canards and blown flaps. Blown surfaces are a huge show stopper for the Navy.
flateric said:If you will read a patent, you will notice, that canard for this family of aircraft (including transport, tanker and bomber) was only intended for transport version.blackkite said:Hmmm......
Canard increase RCS?
We already know that Canard is sensitive, hard to control.
George Allegrezza said:Wait to get the canards I have to get the 21-inch rims too? Is this from Northrop or BMW?
Steve Pace said:True but it's not the US Navy looking for a NGB. The canards are most likely for low-level penetration purposes to help alleviate turbulence. -SPmarauder2048 said:flateric said:Most likely you haven't read the patent at all...Airplane said:Most likely the intended vehicle is a drone, indicative of a USN application.
The patent includes an active control flow system to modulate bleed (or aux pump) air over the canards and other control surfaces. In other words, blown canards and blown flaps. Blown surfaces are a huge show stopper for the Navy.
The U.S. Air Force plans to award Tuesday the contract to develop and produce its next-generation bomber, according to defense officials, settling a competition between Northrop Grumman Corp. and a team of Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp.
The final hurdle in the process was cleared Friday, when Pentagon weapons buyer Frank Kendall briefed senior Defense Department leaders on the selection, officials said. Kendall’s role in the contract was to approve the service proceeding with the award.
If it proceeds as planned, the long-awaited announcement will be made Tuesday after financial markets close, with a press conference by Air Force officials and possibly Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, said the officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the contract deliberations are confidential.
The Long-Range Strike Bomber will be one of the Pentagon’s biggest weapons systems of the next decade. Joining the B-2 bomber, with its radar-evading “flying wing” design, the new plane will be the eventual successor to the 1970s-era B-1 and the Eisenhower-era B-52 when it enters service in the mid-2020s.
Secret Contest
The bomber is part of a family of secret, strike technologies including munitions, sensors needed to find targets, jamming capabilities to suppress enemy radar and communications capable of surviving a nuclear blast’s shock waves. The first version will be piloted and carry conventional weapons, followed by a version that can carry nuclear weapons. An unmanned model may follow.
The contest has been shrouded in secrecy with high stakes for the bidders, the last three U.S. makers of large military aircraft. Defense officials haven’t revealed how much has been spent to hone designs and prototypes since 2011 under classified contracts.
“It’s the biggest airframe contract of the decade at a pivotal moment in the industrial base,” Richard Aboulafia, a defense analyst with the Teal Group, a Fairfax, Virginia-based consultant, said in an interview before the announcement. “You have 2.5 players and one contract. Mathematically, it’s fascinating.”
Air Force officials weighed three main capabilities in making their selection: a production cost projected at $550 million per plane, in 2010 dollars --with no development dollar included -- were given the same weight as payload and range for the competing designs, said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute, who was briefed on the program ahead of the announcement. Boeing and Lockheed have contributed to the institute.
When awarded, the contract will have a cost-plus type engineering, manufacturing and development phase that includes incentives for controlling costs and a fixed-price-incentive contract for the first 20 of the planned 100 aircraft, Air Force officials have said.
sferrin said:NG, GE, and (sadly) 2 engines.
edit: I think the "interim" engines will be P&W because I doubt anything ADVENT-based would be ready in time.
Ian33 said:sferrin said:NG, GE, and (sadly) 2 engines.
edit: I think the "interim" engines will be P&W because I doubt anything ADVENT-based would be ready in time.
Nope, I'm betting the shocker is ADVENT on-board from get go. After all...they said it was ready for a bomber sized airframe.
LowObservable said:Award goes to last-minute unsolicited proposal from UAC/Chengdu. You read it here first.
LowObservable said:Award goes to last-minute unsolicited proposal from UAC/Chengdu. You read it here first.
LowObservable said:Award goes to last-minute unsolicited proposal from UAC/Chengdu. You read it here first.
Deino said:LowObservable said:Award goes to last-minute unsolicited proposal from UAC/Chengdu. You read it here first.
You mean this design ?? ... but this time it is from SAC !
sferrin said:And it's got the Trans Am T-top. ;D