The original image isn't of sufficient quality to clearly read the leader relevant text unfortunately (although some are clear enough to make a good guess). It is shown with an F-4 canopy with fairing, "scissors wing (stored)" with pivot just behind the "ejector seat rails", above the "oxidiizer tank"Awesome! It looks almost like an XRL11 rocket motor. If thats the case then possibly designed to power a boost glide tests similar to NASA's lifting body program. Any additional information?
(New to me) picture of FDL-7 model showing (fold-out?) podded turbo-jets
(New to me) picture of FDL-7 model showing (fold-out?) podded turbo-jets
Given the size and location of the cockpit canopy, this would seem to be a pretty big vehicle, likely Shuttle-scale in capability.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this looks like the precursor model to the final Model 176 configuration, the Model 176 wind tunnel model had a cockpit area in the same general location on a spatulate nose and flat upper surfaces, rather than the laterally curved shape, that follows generally the shape of this particular model. McDonnell influence...(New to me) picture of FDL-7 model showing (fold-out?) podded turbo-jets
Given the size and location of the cockpit canopy, this would seem to be a pretty big vehicle, likely Shuttle-scale in capability.
Appears to be perhaps the same model as appeared in June 22 1970 edition of AW&ST except for the external propulsion pods. There appears to be an upper removable section from cockpit area to mid-fuselage to allow reconfiguration.
View attachment 669351
Perhaps contrarian, but could it be a 'periscope' arrangement ??Given the size and location of the cockpit canopy,
Stargazer, all these links are in operable. If someone has active links or can supply the following: "L-301 Model Pictures and Reports" that would be helpful to me. Thanks!Not 250 files for sure, but an amazing online resource for everything related to the X-24C, HYFAC and L-301 programs at NASA's CRGIS website.
We've only just dug up the surface...
- HYFAC Subsonic Test
- NASA-TM-X-1922
- NASA-TN-D-5932
- HRA Drawing and Data
- FDL-8H and X-24C
- 12 Foot L.S. Tunnel
- Propul. 225
- HRA Free Flight Tunnel Test
- Hypersonic Research Vehicles
- Aero Info
- HYFAC Model Drawings
- Test Logs Basic HYFAC
- X-24C 12-I
- NASA Flight Experiments X-24C Final Briefing
- X-24C 12I and L-301
- X-24C-12I Model
- L-301 Plotted Data Long. Lat.
- Experiments Impact on X-24C Flight Research Vehicle
- X-24C Full Scale
- X-24C 12I
- X-24C-12I Data M=6
- M=6 20" Tunnel Test
- Subsonic LTPT Test X24C-12I
- X24C-12I Drawings
- L-301
- LRC Wind Tunnels "Test Info"
- X-24 Model Drawing
- Boat Tailed 12I Data
- X-24C-12I and X-1
- Low Speed Wind Tunnel X-24 test
- X-24C-L-16
- Scramjet Drag
- L301 Model
- X-24C Catch 2x File
- Penland's X-24C-12I Aero Work-up 10/76
- NHFRF Study Configurations
- L-301 in UPWT
- L-301 Model Pictures and Reports
- X-24 Drawings
- L-301 in M=6 20" Tunnel
- Lockheed X-24C (L-301)
- HYFAC Sketches
- L-301 in 8' TPT
- L-301 Calculations and LTPT Data
- L-301 in LTPT
- X-24 Test Log and X-24 Technical Paper
- Original Penland Paper Drafts
- Computer Drawings
Stargazer, all these links are in operable. If someone has active links or can supply the following: "L-301 Model Pictures and Reports" that would be helpful to me. Thanks!
Anyone got a clue as to what this is? It appeared in a 60's comic Space news section.
Chiz,
Barry
A section of this has been posted previously in the thread, but here is the full page as it's mostly relevant:
(TV Century 21 #105 released by City Magazines Ltd, January 21, 1967)
Fun fact: some years ago I spoke to pone of the people respinsible for that collection. Turns out they set the scanning task to interns, who only scanned the corners. "Well, that sucks," sez I. "How can I go about persuading someone to revisit them? I'd be happy to pay for large format scans of the whole sheet."What appears to be PEN00010_0493 (58 pages) has been uploaded to here containing WHRA-5-2 windtunnel stuff and those oh-so-annoying corner only scans of large sheets.
*cries-in-historical-decimation*That's all there will ever be.
*cries-in-historical-decimation*That's all there will ever be.
Yup. Don't recall which file offhand, though.edit: incidentally was the image you'd posted here from a Penland file?
Again, not offhand.Also the link I'd posted above makes mention of a 5-3 variation - do you know the distinction?
Thank youWelcome to the reality of life, where even Lovecraft was generally a tad too optimistic.
Yup. Don't recall which file offhand, though.edit: incidentally was the image you'd posted here from a Penland file?
Again, not offhand.Also the link I'd posted above makes mention of a 5-3 variation - do you know the distinction?
Is there any information that this vehicle was associated with the MERV (Manueverable Entry Research Vehicle) program? I have a drawing of a variant of the MERV considered in a study as an ISS crew rescue vehicle. MERV was supposed to be a USAF proram that could have potentially followed the X-24B for the USAF's investigations into aeromechanics, flight controls, TPS, etc (beyond X-24C). However, after a search on the SPF I haven't found any program information on MERV here. Also, not sure where it fits into the TAV story, if at all.FDL-7MC-MSTV, July '67 :
53 years ago over half a centuryAnyone got a clue as to what this is? It appeared in a 60's comic Space news section.
Chiz,
Barry
A section of this has been posted previously in the thread, but here is the full page as it's mostly relevant:
(TV Century 21 #105 released by City Magazines Ltd, January 21, 1967)
..and again from Air Force Magazine / Space Digest January 1969 article :
The Ultimate in Hypersonic Flight - The Aerospace Plane
by Edgar E. Ulsamer
View attachment 672753
bonus Lockheed "scaled hypervelocity vehicle configuration" from same article :
View attachment 672752
Just like caption says. NHFRF.
Test vehicle, including testing hypersonic stores release. Not an operational military craft.Just like caption says. NHFRF.
I know that,but carrying and launch a missile ?!.
Test vehicle, including testing hypersonic stores release. Not an operational military craft.
Test vehicle, including testing hypersonic stores release. Not an operational military craft.
That was not my point,why did they study and test a missile on a craft,not qualified for this purpose from beginning ?.
Moreover, it would be eminently sensible to test how launching missiles at Mach 6 works before you build a Mach 6 interceptor. Building the interceptor first then discovering it can't launch missiles because you didn't fully understand the issues would be rather unfortunate.Because if you want to have a Mach 6 interceptor, you need to test Mach 6 missile launching. And if you already have a Mach 6 test aircraft that has swappable compartments and *can* be turned into a Mach 6 missile launcher, it would be entirely sensible to use that test aircraft for that purpose. It's no ,more unusual than using your mach 6 test aircraft to demonstrate components or technologies for, say, a Mach 6 passenger transport.
I wonder what type of TPS the MERV used?MERV as applied to ISS. Possibly affiliated with MRRV https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...v-maneuvering-re-entry-research-vehicle.1501/
MERV as applied to ISS.
Does Stratolaunch live here ??
Stratolaunch unveils new test aircraft for hypersonic flight program
Back in 2020 we first heard about the Talon-A hypersonic aircraft, which would be released from the world's largest airplane at an altitude of 35,000 ft (10,000 m). A test version of the Talon-A, called the TA-0, was unveiled this week.newatlas.comThe Future of Hypersonic Testing
Stratolaunch drives innovation critical to advancing hypersonic technologies.www.stratolaunch.com
The paper was titled A Systems Analysis of Emergency Escape and Recovery Systems for the U.S. Space Station by Kelly (1986). Try this link (it looks like the same one but worked for me):MERV as applied to ISS.
What's the source on that? Might be this, but all I get are error messages:
Link now seems to be workingMERV as applied to ISS.
What's the source on that? Might be this, but all I get are error messages: