Are the projectiles powered or driven by just the canon energy alone?
Most bmdo interception data is not longer on the internet. One can believe incorrectness they want. ..not arguing any more.
The idea bmdo would pay for anti-tank tech . Do folks even read what they post?
Just for shiz and giggles, anybody know what your muzzle velocity would have to be for a 1000 mile shot with a non-powered projectile? (For this round I'm wondering if it's not a ramjet but a scramjet. Basically accelerate after leaving the barrel, gaining speed and altitude, until there's no more air to breathe.)I find it odd that no one has even come out and stated how the SLRC will work. I think everyone presumes that it is a launcher for solid rocket fueled ramjet missiles, basically skipping the booster stage, but I don't think even that has ever been publicly released. I saw a quote from one of the people running the project stating that the goal was a $500,000 per projectile cost. That makes sense - at that price point, you've undercut most classes of cruise missile in terms of range, speed, and expense. But it seems like a daunting goal and I can't imagine they could squeeze much terminal effect into the projectile even if they reach it.
Just for shiz and giggles, anybody know what your muzzle velocity would have to be for a 1000 mile shot with a non-powered projectile? (For this round I'm wondering if it's not a ramjet but a scramjet. Basically accelerate after leaving the barrel, gaining speed and altitude, until there's no more air to breathe.)
Also as an aside, if Nammo ever gets the concept working in a cost effective way, maybe the USN can finally build a projectile for the Zummies.
Also as an aside, if Nammo ever gets the concept working in a cost effective way, maybe the USN can finally build a projectile for the Zummies.
Scale them up a tad (caliber, not range) and maybe you have a new Montana.
Of course. This is the kind of thing that could replace some functions of a CVN. Still doesn't control air or below the sea but at least it gets in the same order of magnitude of amount or ordinance on target at range.Scale them up a tad (caliber, not range) and maybe you have a new Montana.
Nuclear powered, I trust?
No idea what the math is, but I think if you accelerated purely with propellant you'd probably have to use a solid shot.
Can't rule out scramjet, but I just assumed the technology would be more daunting where as there are operational solid fuel ramjets (Meteor)
If HVP can intercept incoming missiles it would undoubtedly be a great thing to have but I cannot envison it having much if any utility in the naval gunfire support role the 155mm AGS was supposed to fill. Simply not enough explosive charge.HVP seems to be a perfectly usable round for the Zumwalts -- the 155mm sabot is roughly the same as needed for the Army, though I suppose it may be slightly different thanks to AGS having a non-standard chamber volume.
If HVP can intercept incoming missiles it would undoubtedly be a great thing to have but I cannot envison it having much if any utility in the naval gunfire support role the 155mm AGS was supposed to fill. Simply not enough explosive charge.HVP seems to be a perfectly usable round for the Zumwalts -- the 155mm sabot is roughly the same as needed for the Army, though I suppose it may be slightly different thanks to AGS having a non-standard chamber volume.
Why not just grab the company that did Crusader's?
So no MRSI at the 10 rpm?They may have to consider an autoloader with a fixed loading angle to save weight/complexity/cg. Traditionally it's an RoF hit to angle the gun up/down each shot, but AGS got to 10 rounds per minute with a fixed loading angle, and that's with having to swing the gun all the way up to vertical to load.
If you can angle the gun fast enough, MRSI is still possible with a fixed loading angle.So no MRSI at the 10 rpm?They may have to consider an autoloader with a fixed loading angle to save weight/complexity/cg. Traditionally it's an RoF hit to angle the gun up/down each shot, but AGS got to 10 rounds per minute with a fixed loading angle, and that's with having to swing the gun all the way up to vertical to load.
Edit: I guess with certain guided rounds it's still possible.
Looking back at the specs: it was at the 8 rounds (obj) and 4 rounds (threshold).If you can angle the gun fast enough, MRSI is still possible with a fixed loading angle.So no MRSI at the 10 rpm?They may have to consider an autoloader with a fixed loading angle to save weight/complexity/cg. Traditionally it's an RoF hit to angle the gun up/down each shot, but AGS got to 10 rounds per minute with a fixed loading angle, and that's with having to swing the gun all the way up to vertical to load.
Edit: I guess with certain guided rounds it's still possible.
Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact. The lone gun's ToT.MRSI?
Multiple Round Simultaneous impact. A time-on-target technique where you fire at gradually decreasing elevation angles such that the rounds allMRSI?