US Army - Lockheed Martin Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF)

What? No, that article is full of complete no sequiturs and falsehoods.
Some perhaps but the assessment that the S-400/500 is unlikely to be able to intercept it seems correct. However the maximum intercept altitude for the A235 is incorrectly stated, since it's 50km not >80km, which wouldn't be much use against a glide warhead anyway.
 
Yes, it makes a big difference when I read it slowly rather than scan reading. It's badly written for sure. I think when I was scan-reading it I was making sense of it in my head rather than reading the actual words. Having read the actual words I think I'll file it next to bulgarianmilitary.com in future.

Anyway, launch video:

View: https://x.com/JConcilus/status/1867260958801805468

What is the bulge on the righthand side of the missile that sticks out a bit? Datalink antenna?


1734105394606.png



 
Last edited:
New Defense Updates video about the USMC's new NMESIS system:


US Marines from the 3d Marine Littoral Regiment (3d MLR), part of the 3d Marine Division, now have a powerful new weapon in their arsenal. The regiment has received the Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS), an advanced anti-ship missile system.
Beyond the menacing name, the NMESIS is designed to boost the Marine Corps’ anti-ship capabilities, particularly for potential conflicts in the Pacific theater, where Marine units would be expected to deploy to several islands throughout the ocean.
This marks the first deployment of the NMESIS in the field, following years of testing and development. The system will be operated by the regiment's Medium-Range Missile Battery, based in Oahu, Hawaii.
In this video, Defense Updates analyzes how the US Marine Corps is getting a major capability boost with NMESIS ?
Chapters:
00:11 INTRODUCTION
01:59 NEMESIS OVERVIEW
03:56 NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE (NSM)
06:43 ANALYSIS
 
US has awarded BAE a contract to produce a prototype 155mm AA gun battery consisting of 8 cannons, 4 radars, 2 control vehicles utilising the Hypervelocity Projectile ammunition developed for the aborted railgun program. The cannons will be on self propelled wheeled vehicles similar to Archer and the battery should consist of no less than a 144 round capability. The battery is to protect fixed and semi-fixed locations from the full range of aerial threats (drones, fixed wing aircraft, rotary wing aircraft, missiles).


I think this would be the largest calibre AA gun ever produced and the first large calibre AA gun since the 50's?
 
I think this would be the largest calibre AA gun ever produced and the first large calibre AA gun since the 50's?

The Soviets did experiment with a 152mm AA gun, and of course there are the various dual-role 6-inch naval guns from the 1940s, but those lose on a 3-mm technicality.

XSAM-N-8 Zeus was fired out of an 8-inch gun, so by some measures that beats out the MDAC for size honors. Though you could definitely argue the 8-inch gun was not really an AA mount.

It is almost certainly true that this would be the first new AA gun design larger than 130mm to reach production since the 1950s. Assuming it actually does reach production.
 
US has awarded BAE a contract to produce a prototype 155mm AA gun battery consisting of 8 cannons, 4 radars, 2 control vehicles utilising the Hypervelocity Projectile ammunition developed for the aborted railgun program. The cannons will be on self propelled wheeled vehicles similar to Archer and the battery should consist of no less than a 144 round capability. The battery is to protect fixed and semi-fixed locations from the full range of aerial threats (drones, fixed wing aircraft, rotary wing aircraft, missiles).


I think this would be the largest calibre AA gun ever produced and the first large calibre AA gun since the 50's?

Since ever, unless you’re counting battleship main guns with very rarely used anti aircraft munitions (ETA: I want to say the IJN made some rounds like this that were almost never used?). I cannot recall dedicated or even dual use AA over 152mm/6”, and even that is limited to some cruisers of questionable AA value. The WWII USN 5” seems to be the outstanding example of effectiveness in that caliber range.
 
Since ever, unless you’re counting battleship main guns with very rarely used anti aircraft munitions (ETA: I want to say the IJN made some rounds like this that were almost never used?). I cannot recall dedicated or even dual use AA over 152mm/6”, and even that is limited to some cruisers of questionable AA value.
Just the 8" Zeus round, which was only in testing and not deployed.



The WWII USN 5” seems to be the outstanding example of effectiveness in that caliber range.
The US 6"/47 automatics on the Worcester class CLs were pretty mean. 12x 6"/47s (6x2), plus 24x 3"/50s (11x2, 2x1). 12 rpm per gun, so 144 rounds per minute of 105lb HE with mechanical or RF prox fuzes.
 
The USN 203mm on the Des Moines were the biggest duel purpose gun that reach service and apperant murder targets scary fast and far for their time.
I'm still irked that the 8" Mk71 guns weren't adopted... And today it'd be interesting to see what would happen if someone stuck a 155mm extreme low drag projectile into a sabot for 8" bore.
 
More on that:

 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom