I'm just wondering where the gunpowder gases will come from the rocket?
similar to rpg-7I'm just wondering where the gunpowder gases will come from the rocket?
There are a pair of nozzles in the base.
My very rough guess is that this is more of a low-pressure gun firing rocket-assisted rounds. So there is a gunpowder charge in the case that ejects the projectile and then the rocket accelerates it and spins it up.
similar to rpg-7I'm just wondering where the gunpowder gases will come from the rocket?
There are a pair of nozzles in the base.
My very rough guess is that this is more of a low-pressure gun firing rocket-assisted rounds. So there is a gunpowder charge in the case that ejects the projectile and then the rocket accelerates it and spins it up.
say what military Light Gas Gun?does anyone know anything about this 35mm anti aircraft missile cannon developed by an american firm in the 70's.
Way earlier. Looks like late 1950s.
38x310 Cased T225 Rocket Round
What a beautiful, sectioned and off the charts fascinating item. Blown away. Looking forward to learning more about this one. Jason PS: WOW!forum.cartridgecollectors.org
According to German-Navy.de, a version of the Föhn AA rocket system was used on some R-boats (small coastal patrol gunboats / minehunters) in the latter part of the war, as an anti-strafing-aircraft weapon. The pintle mount was at the stern, with 360 degree rotation.Föhn was a anti-aircraft, unguided rocket system that had 35 racks firing a 7.3cm Raketen Sprenggranat, spin-stabilized rocket. The racks could be elevated and traversed via a simple mechanism with a rudimentary sight.
A few of them got into battle, some being used by the 900th. Flak Training & Testing Battalion that had some installed along the Rhine to defend important bridges. There was also a mobile version, mounted on a two-wheeled trailer. More often than not, those used in combat were in the ground-to-ground bombardment role rather than their intended purpose.
Die Deutsche Kriegsmarine 1935-1945 Vol I-IV | Breyer, S. & Elfrath, U. & Koop, G.; Weltbild Verlag 1994 (Volume I-III: German/English) |
Naval launchers were 35-shot too, although they apparently could fire rockets in two salvos of 20 and 15, instead of only one as in the land variant.The provided information does not make clear how many rockets/rails the R-boat launchers had.
from the same IAA forum thread
The British system ...
A bit late but better than never.I have a vague recollection of an 1970/80's British system called Seafox, which IIRC was a unguided rocket system intended as CIWS (the rockets were possibly hypersonic).
I would be grateful for any additional information you gents may have.
Regards.
Was that around the timeframe that CRV-7 became the UK rocket of choice or was it too early, being more the Matra/SNEB side of things?It was a 1978 project between Hunting, Ferranti, Marconi and VSEL. Marconi was developing the radar and the proximity fuze.
There was no real data on the rocket itself, presumably a fairly standard FFAR?
Was that around the timeframe that CRV-7 became the UK rocket of choice or was it too early, being more the Matra/SNEB side of things?
Seems an awfully short life.Some notes on Genie's motor. Interestingly the entire aft section of the missile, including fins, was provided as a unitary motor assembly:
And for disposal:
Love Wild Arms stuff. I need to build one of those. (much cheaper to build your own here in the US and file the tax paperwork than to mess with the manufacturing side of it. Manufacturing FFL is something like $10k/yr for the "Special Occupational Tax" for machine guns and destructive devices!)A recently released video showing someone firing a replica of the WWII 'Fliegerfaust' weapon.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fskM6iUSbA
Tube weight. A tube that can take 12.7x99mm firing pressure is a lot heavier than the tube you need to keep a rocket going straight until the spin jets get it up to speed.Why use a rocket when you can use multiple 12.7mm tubes which will use 12.7 mm ammunition, and to reduce the gases, something like the Croatian rt-20 would work. Аnd the weapons had about 10 barrels placed at a certain angle
I don't know if that would hold the rifling for more than 1 shot.That's exactly how the weight of the pipes takes its toll, there are still not enough light and strong materials that will withstand the pressure of 12.7 mm x 99. But I think about this one aluminum alloy- boron fiber composite?
Boron fiber - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
something like the old artillery systems from before 1860 where on the bullet grain itself there were previously grooves that will enter the grooves of the tube itself. In the picture British Mark IV or the Italian СavalliI don't know if that would hold the rifling for more than 1 shot.
That's still used on some systems today, it's called pre-engraved rifling.something like the old artillery systems from before 1860 where on the bullet grain itself there were previously grooves that will enter the grooves of the tube itself. In the picture British Mark IV or the Italian Сavalli
Тhanks Scott Kenny for the information, because I live in a non-English speaking country and I didn't know the English term for pre-engraved rifling because that's where I live everything is understood as rifling
Gotta love KISS principle!Тhe North Koreans had made a similar weapon fors hooting low-flying aircraft.Оnly with the difference that they installed more machine guns that they activated with the help of a bow. the wooden wheel serves for rotation
Anyone try chain shot? Better for drones perhaps…
Shotguns only have about a 30-50m range. Barring FPV kamikazes, that's pretty close to the "bomb release" range...maybe if more semi-automatic shotguns are used that will unleash a large number of small rounds that are enough to cover a drone and destroy it
Fireworks can have elaborate displays... maybe an answer there...Shotguns only have about a 30-50m range. Barring FPV kamikazes, that's pretty close to the "bomb release" range...
What was old is new yet again:In WWI (and I suspect WWII), I know the British did deploy nets strung between barrage balloons. If you can find the book, "The First Battle of Britain" which is about the German air offensive against the UK during WWI, there are several pictures of them.
If am not mistaken, similar schemes were proposed back during the Cold War on both sides as part of anti-cruise missile defences.The balloons are designed to launch from hangars, rise quickly in a row and then drop a 250m-tall net to form a defensive cordon.
Polina Albek, the general director of First Airship, told a conference in St Petersburg this week that the balloons had already been tested and that her company had received orders.
She said: “Our main activity is building cargo airships but today, based on the experience of our ancestors, we have created the ‘Barrier’ protection system.”
Photographs of a suspected prototype showed a white balloon with large blue fins at its rear floating above a birch forest and a lake.
First Airship has said that each balloon can float up to 300m above the ground and has a maximum load of 30kg, enough to carry the light net that hangs just above the ground.
The balloons can also be equipped with radar, electronic jammers and video cameras which give 360-degree views with a range of up to seven miles.
Ms Albek said: “These capabilities allow for substantial vertical coverage, creating an effective barrier against low-flying drones that threaten sensitive locations. The drones can’t see the mesh net, it’s too thin for them.”